TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:If only we had someone on the board who was qualified to opine on the appropriate type of track and field unitard and it’s efficiency for ghay sex.
or the crew team
Murtered
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:If only we had someone on the board who was qualified to opine on the appropriate type of track and field unitard and it’s efficiency for ghay sex.
or the crew team
BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:If only we had someone on the board who was qualified to opine on the appropriate type of track and field unitard and it’s efficiency for ghay sex.
or the crew team
Murtered
Wikipedia {l Wrote}:Spaziani is known as a wordsmith often answering interview questions with unintelligible murmurs or seemingly invented words. He has been honored by his peers as the most underqualified coach ever assigned to a head coaching role at a Division 1 school
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:50% increase and contract doesn't include football
would rather be the #1 school for new balance than the 239048th for nike / ua
it's 50% "per athlete" so football should not be included in either the numerator or the denominator. this is right up there with the cost of scholarships impacting the budget on the "confuse them with accounting" descriptors
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:50% increase and contract doesn't include football
would rather be the #1 school for new balance than the 239048th for nike / ua
it's 50% "per athlete" so football should not be included in either the numerator or the denominator. this is right up there with the cost of scholarships impacting the budget on the "confuse them with accounting" descriptors
BC should just put all of the students on scholarship since it doesn't impact the budget.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:50% increase and contract doesn't include football
would rather be the #1 school for new balance than the 239048th for nike / ua
it's 50% "per athlete" so football should not be included in either the numerator or the denominator. this is right up there with the cost of scholarships impacting the budget on the "confuse them with accounting" descriptors
BC should just put all of the students on scholarship since it doesn't impact the budget.
so you are saying that they budgeted for all the students to be on scholarship? if so, then putting all the students on scholarship doesn't impact the budget.
oh, wait, no they did not put all the students on scholarship. instead, they knew how many players they will have on scholarship and budgeted using that knowledge. hmmm, that makes sense so that can't be right
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:50% increase and contract doesn't include football
would rather be the #1 school for new balance than the 239048th for nike / ua
it's 50% "per athlete" so football should not be included in either the numerator or the denominator. this is right up there with the cost of scholarships impacting the budget on the "confuse them with accounting" descriptors
BC should just put all of the students on scholarship since it doesn't impact the budget.
so you are saying that they budgeted for all the students to be on scholarship? if so, then putting all the students on scholarship doesn't impact the budget.
oh, wait, no they did not put all the students on scholarship. instead, they knew how many players they will have on scholarship and budgeted using that knowledge. hmmm, that makes sense so that can't be right
The school was in a cash crunch at the time, because it had to liquidate certain investments in order to pay by cashier's check at the scholarship store. NCAA bylaws prohibit buying scholarships on credit.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:50% increase and contract doesn't include football
would rather be the #1 school for new balance than the 239048th for nike / ua
it's 50% "per athlete" so football should not be included in either the numerator or the denominator. this is right up there with the cost of scholarships impacting the budget on the "confuse them with accounting" descriptors
BC should just put all of the students on scholarship since it doesn't impact the budget.
so you are saying that they budgeted for all the students to be on scholarship? if so, then putting all the students on scholarship doesn't impact the budget.
oh, wait, no they did not put all the students on scholarship. instead, they knew how many players they will have on scholarship and budgeted using that knowledge. hmmm, that makes sense so that can't be right
The school was in a cash crunch at the time, because it had to liquidate certain investments in order to pay by cashier's check at the scholarship store. NCAA bylaws prohibit buying scholarships on credit.
this is better snarky shtick than the chalupa delivered. if you had worked in something about the declaration of red shirts, it would have been a perfect 5 out of 10 for you, funishment
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:50% increase and contract doesn't include football
would rather be the #1 school for new balance than the 239048th for nike / ua
it's 50% "per athlete" so football should not be included in either the numerator or the denominator. this is right up there with the cost of scholarships impacting the budget on the "confuse them with accounting" descriptors
BC should just put all of the students on scholarship since it doesn't impact the budget.
so you are saying that they budgeted for all the students to be on scholarship? if so, then putting all the students on scholarship doesn't impact the budget.
oh, wait, no they did not put all the students on scholarship. instead, they knew how many players they will have on scholarship and budgeted using that knowledge. hmmm, that makes sense so that can't be right
The school was in a cash crunch at the time, because it had to liquidate certain investments in order to pay by cashier's check at the scholarship store. NCAA bylaws prohibit buying scholarships on credit.
this is better snarky shtick than the chalupa delivered. if you had worked in something about the declaration of red shirts, it would have been a perfect 5 out of 10 for you, funishment
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Not to mention the adverse impacts the fire has to the environment.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Zero shit there I would buy. Not surprised from the shoe company that outfits the irrelevant programs plus women's lax.
hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Zero shit there I would buy. Not surprised from the shoe company that outfits the irrelevant programs plus women's lax.
Men's Ice Hockey isn't irrelevant.
hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Zero shit there I would buy. Not surprised from the shoe company that outfits the irrelevant programs plus women's lax.
Men's Ice Hockey isn't irrelevant.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Zero shit there I would buy. Not surprised from the shoe company that outfits the irrelevant programs plus women's lax.
Men's Ice Hockey isn't irrelevant.
Shut up, hansen
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:How about one attempt at a hat? How come no vendors ever can make a decent hat out of a school with BC for initials and a bald eagle for a mascot? Jesus, stop sucking.
MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:I was surprised by what NB is letting the baseball team do wrt the jerseys.
hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Zero shit there I would buy. Not surprised from the shoe company that outfits the irrelevant programs plus women's lax.
Men's Ice Hockey isn't irrelevant.
Shut up, hansen
ok
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Colonel Shtickishment made me laugh.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests