ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Looks like the ACC and ESPN are going to take bowls from other conferences and put BC in something.
Speculation includes:
Boca vs UCF (AC hosting the name tag event?)
Or St Pete vs BYU
Both those would be good games so we will probably get someone shitty in Shreveport.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Looks like the ACC and ESPN are going to take bowls from other conferences and put BC in something.
Speculation includes:
Boca vs UCF (AC hosting the name tag event?)
Or St Pete vs BYU
Both those would be good games so we will probably get someone shitty in Shreveport.
Figures this will be the year we get a bowl in a location worth going to.
HJS {l Wrote}:The Big10 played this year only because Ohio State demanded it so they could walk into the playoffs by playing in a sub-MAC conference. B10 had a minimum games played requirement to make the Championship game... which they waived because OSU didn't meet it. The Big Ten has become more beholden to Ohio State than B12 has Texas.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... -game-rule
HJS {l Wrote}:The Big10 played this year only because Ohio State demanded it so they could walk into the playoffs by playing in a sub-MAC conference. B10 had a minimum games played requirement to make the Championship game... which they waived because OSU didn't meet it. The Big Ten has become more beholden to Ohio State than B12 has Texas.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... -game-rule
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The Big10 played this year only because Ohio State demanded it so they could walk into the playoffs by playing in a sub-MAC conference. B10 had a minimum games played requirement to make the Championship game... which they waived because OSU didn't meet it. The Big Ten has become more beholden to Ohio State than B12 has Texas.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... -game-rule
In 0.0hio St's defense, they were one of the 3 Big Whatever schools that voted against cancelling the season.
HJS {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The Big10 played this year only because Ohio State demanded it so they could walk into the playoffs by playing in a sub-MAC conference. B10 had a minimum games played requirement to make the Championship game... which they waived because OSU didn't meet it. The Big Ten has become more beholden to Ohio State than B12 has Texas.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... -game-rule
In 0.0hio St's defense, they were one of the 3 Big Whatever schools that voted against cancelling the season.
That's not really a defense. They still went along with it (while Nebraska was exploring ways to play elsewhere for a season). At the end of the day, they will have played 6 games against terrible opponents. Should they get a spot over an undefeated Cincy team with 10 games or an undefeated USC team with 5 games? Probably. But, they shouldn't replace Bama or ND if they lose in the championship game against Florida and Clemson. And, I think there is an argument to be made that TAMU is more deserving than OSU, Cincy or USC. OSU passes the eye test based upon the names on the backs of the jersey. But, they haven't shown a thing on the field yet (as even Cincy had a more difficult schedule).
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:The Big10 played this year only because Ohio State demanded it so they could walk into the playoffs by playing in a sub-MAC conference. B10 had a minimum games played requirement to make the Championship game... which they waived because OSU didn't meet it. The Big Ten has become more beholden to Ohio State than B12 has Texas.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/s ... -game-rule
In 0.0hio St's defense, they were one of the 3 Big Whatever schools that voted against cancelling the season.
That's not really a defense. They still went along with it (while Nebraska was exploring ways to play elsewhere for a season). At the end of the day, they will have played 6 games against terrible opponents. Should they get a spot over an undefeated Cincy team with 10 games or an undefeated USC team with 5 games? Probably. But, they shouldn't replace Bama or ND if they lose in the championship game against Florida and Clemson. And, I think there is an argument to be made that TAMU is more deserving than OSU, Cincy or USC. OSU passes the eye test based upon the names on the backs of the jersey. But, they haven't shown a thing on the field yet (as even Cincy had a more difficult schedule).
This. Ohio State played one top 20 opponent at home and were lucky to escape with the win. I don't think anyone who watched Fields toss 5 INTs against the one semi-competent defense he played thinks that version of Ohio State would have a chance in hell against Alabama, Notre Dame, Clemson, Florida or A&M. Ohio State is basically USC with much higher preseason expectations. Frankly, I think the Playoff Committee should tell them they need to play Cincinnati for the winner to be considered--although at this point I think Cincy has a much better resume and case for making the playoffs. Ditto for A&M who apparently has called tOSU out and offered to play them anytime, anywhere. Florida also has a stronger case, but I expect that Bama will beat them and with two losses they'll be out off the conversation.
MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:We're not going bowling.
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 2163969025
HJS {l Wrote}:On an aside... I am genuinely surprised the way both Michigan and FSU quit this year. I hope this leaves a lasting, reputation-damaging stain on both inflated programs.
BC923 {l Wrote}:Sounds like players decided they’d rather head home and relax, which I fully support
claver2010 {l Wrote}:BC923 {l Wrote}:Sounds like players decided they’d rather head home and relax, which I fully support
agreed.
these kids are going to need to be back for winter training in 6 weeks.
why go into lockdown again for a couple of more weeks for a game that there's a decent chance it doesn't get played and you don't get any of the side benefits of being in a bowl
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:We're not going bowling.
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 2163969025
No problem with this if it was the players' decision (and it sounds like it was).
HJS {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:We're not going bowling.
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 2163969025
No problem with this if it was the players' decision (and it sounds like it was).
Agreed. The last Hafley conference where he said "I think so" in response to whether the kids were excited about a bowl... and then went on to talk about how tired the team was (as a partial excuse for sucking against UVA)... was an omen that this was coming. BC players were more diligent than any other group in the country. That is how they effectively avoided an outbreak. To do that for another month, through Xmas and New Years, would require even more sacrifice. Why bother? This is the same group who have had successive bowl games cancelled on them. There is nothing to say that, after spending an additional month in the bubble, THIS bowl game wouldn't be cancelled due to a local politician or an outbreak by the opponent. I'm glad they pulled the plug on the season, but sad to see Grosel not get the chance to further his reputation as BC's version of Ian Book.
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:We're not going bowling.
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 2163969025
No problem with this if it was the players' decision (and it sounds like it was).
Agreed. The last Hafley conference where he said "I think so" in response to whether the kids were excited about a bowl... and then went on to talk about how tired the team was (as a partial excuse for sucking against UVA)... was an omen that this was coming. BC players were more diligent than any other group in the country. That is how they effectively avoided an outbreak. To do that for another month, through Xmas and New Years, would require even more sacrifice. Why bother? This is the same group who have had successive bowl games cancelled on them. There is nothing to say that, after spending an additional month in the bubble, THIS bowl game wouldn't be cancelled due to a local politician or an outbreak by the opponent. I'm glad they pulled the plug on the season, but sad to see Grosel not get the chance to further his reputation as BC's version of Ian Book.
Ian Book has thrown fewer interceptions in his last 15 games then Grosel did in the embarrassing UVA loss. Now if Phil's knee still needs more time and we were going to have to play in a bowl with a kid who should be playing MAC Ball on Tuesday nights on The Ocho, then perhaps this was a sound decision to avoid further embarrassment.
HJS {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:We're not going bowling.
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 2163969025
No problem with this if it was the players' decision (and it sounds like it was).
Agreed. The last Hafley conference where he said "I think so" in response to whether the kids were excited about a bowl... and then went on to talk about how tired the team was (as a partial excuse for sucking against UVA)... was an omen that this was coming. BC players were more diligent than any other group in the country. That is how they effectively avoided an outbreak. To do that for another month, through Xmas and New Years, would require even more sacrifice. Why bother? This is the same group who have had successive bowl games cancelled on them. There is nothing to say that, after spending an additional month in the bubble, THIS bowl game wouldn't be cancelled due to a local politician or an outbreak by the opponent. I'm glad they pulled the plug on the season, but sad to see Grosel not get the chance to further his reputation as BC's version of Ian Book.
Ian Book has thrown fewer interceptions in his last 15 games then Grosel did in the embarrassing UVA loss. Now if Phil's knee still needs more time and we were going to have to play in a bowl with a kid who should be playing MAC Ball on Tuesday nights on The Ocho, then perhaps this was a sound decision to avoid further embarrassment.
So... you finally admit that Tommy Rees was right.
I'll also take the moment to point out that only one BC player was able to beat out Ian Book... Grosel for ACC QB of the Week.
lnnocent Bystander {l Wrote}:I'm sure this decision was made easier by the fact that everyone who should be leaving has another year of eligibility if he so desires. That fact makes the decision to go home now and get laid tonight a no brainer.
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:We're not going bowling.
https://twitter.com/PeteThamel/status/1 ... 2163969025
No problem with this if it was the players' decision (and it sounds like it was).
Agreed. The last Hafley conference where he said "I think so" in response to whether the kids were excited about a bowl... and then went on to talk about how tired the team was (as a partial excuse for sucking against UVA)... was an omen that this was coming. BC players were more diligent than any other group in the country. That is how they effectively avoided an outbreak. To do that for another month, through Xmas and New Years, would require even more sacrifice. Why bother? This is the same group who have had successive bowl games cancelled on them. There is nothing to say that, after spending an additional month in the bubble, THIS bowl game wouldn't be cancelled due to a local politician or an outbreak by the opponent. I'm glad they pulled the plug on the season, but sad to see Grosel not get the chance to further his reputation as BC's version of Ian Book.
Ian Book has thrown fewer interceptions in his last 15 games then Grosel did in the embarrassing UVA loss. Now if Phil's knee still needs more time and we were going to have to play in a bowl with a kid who should be playing MAC Ball on Tuesday nights on The Ocho, then perhaps this was a sound decision to avoid further embarrassment.
So... you finally admit that Tommy Rees was right.
I'll also take the moment to point out that only one BC player was able to beat out Ian Book... Grosel for ACC QB of the Week.
We will never know if he was right. I would have liked to see Jurk playing behind an OL that could keep him upright and having time to stretch defenses with passes longer than 35 yards downfield. Book has had a great season, no doubt, but Jurk has a lot more upside and it would have been nice if they had attempted develop him. Anyway, next year they will have Brendan Clark and we will have Jurk. I'd much rather be us than them from a QB perspective going forward.
You know who has no upside? Dennis Grosel. And his multi-turnover performance was as worthy of that award as the chick squib kicker's SEC Award. Weird to see you doing an affirmative action flex/cake and ice cream award for Denny G, but 2020 is a strange year I suppose.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 269 guests