Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:get smoked by ND, "shock the world" against pitt, beat a terrible team in a terrible bowl, 7-6
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:get smoked by ND, "shock the world" against pitt, beat a terrible team in a terrible bowl, 7-6
hansen {l Wrote}:Lol, Kelly has to answer questions about redshirting and recruiting during ND press conferences wtf.
hansen {l Wrote}:Assuming Bailey is fully healthy...
I think Daz pulls this one out of his ass to get his sixth win. Opens up the playbook with plenty of trick plays and new looks on defense.
BC has historically played Notre Dame close — even some really bad BC teams over the years minus a couple times here or there — and I think this year will be no different. The team just seems to get up for the children of the corn for whatever reason.I think BC will do just enough on defense, Dillon and Bailey will have monster and big games respectively, and we win 34-30.
I realize this prediction is not logical but I just have a feeling.
eagletx {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:Assuming Bailey is fully healthy...
I think Daz pulls this one out of his ass to get his sixth win. Opens up the playbook with plenty of trick plays and new looks on defense.
BC has historically played Notre Dame close — even some really bad BC teams over the years minus a couple times here or there — and I think this year will be no different. The team just seems to get up for the children of the corn for whatever reason.I think BC will do just enough on defense, Dillon and Bailey will have monster and big games respectively, and we win 34-30.
I realize this prediction is not logical but I just have a feeling.
no reason to put your lack of credibility at risk at this late date in the season.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:The 1996 game was right after the gambling "scandal" and half the team was suspended. I believe Tim Hasselbeck was the long snapper?
I don't remember the 1995 game at all. The 1994 game was the highlight of He Who Shall Not Be Named's tenure. Our D absolutely dominated them.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:The 1996 game was right after the gambling "scandal" and half the team was suspended. I believe Tim Hasselbeck was the long snapper?
I don't remember the 1995 game at all. The 1994 game was the highlight of He Who Shall Not Be Named's tenure. Our D absolutely dominated them.
hansen {l Wrote}:eagletx {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:Assuming Bailey is fully healthy...
I think Daz pulls this one out of his ass to get his sixth win. Opens up the playbook with plenty of trick plays and new looks on defense.
BC has historically played Notre Dame close — even some really bad BC teams over the years minus a couple times here or there — and I think this year will be no different. The team just seems to get up for the children of the corn for whatever reason.I think BC will do just enough on defense, Dillon and Bailey will have monster and big games respectively, and we win 34-30.
I realize this prediction is not logical but I just have a feeling.
no reason to put your lack of credibility at risk at this late date in the season.
Notre Dame is giving up greater than 4 yards per rush. I think they are ranked something like 50th in the category. Assuming Bailey and Dillon are 100%, I think that there will be yards/points to be had. Basically, it then comes down to whether the defense can tackle. it can’t get any worse than what it’s been so I’m thinking that combined with with the bye and some adjustments is just enough to keep the game close.
In addition, ND ranked 15th can’t really do enough to make the cotton bowl so not sure how much they have to play for at this point. I think BC will be hungrier.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Good stuff: https://www.boston.com/sports/college-s ... -evolution
eagletx {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:eagletx {l Wrote}:hansen {l Wrote}:Assuming Bailey is fully healthy...
I think Daz pulls this one out of his ass to get his sixth win. Opens up the playbook with plenty of trick plays and new looks on defense.
BC has historically played Notre Dame close — even some really bad BC teams over the years minus a couple times here or there — and I think this year will be no different. The team just seems to get up for the children of the corn for whatever reason.I think BC will do just enough on defense, Dillon and Bailey will have monster and big games respectively, and we win 34-30.
I realize this prediction is not logical but I just have a feeling.
no reason to put your lack of credibility at risk at this late date in the season.
Notre Dame is giving up greater than 4 yards per rush. I think they are ranked something like 50th in the category. Assuming Bailey and Dillon are 100%, I think that there will be yards/points to be had. Basically, it then comes down to whether the defense can tackle. it can’t get any worse than what it’s been so I’m thinking that combined with with the bye and some adjustments is just enough to keep the game close.
In addition, ND ranked 15th can’t really do enough to make the cotton bowl so not sure how much they have to play for at this point. I think BC will be hungrier.
Ah, if only history had any i.pact at all.....with a historical perspective in mind, this current BC defense is epically bad...this is a kind of game where BC could totally dominate the time of possession and lose by two or three scores.
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Georgia, who lets face it, has a far superior offensive line, a comparable running back and far superior coaching, tried pounding the rock, got nowhere and was only able to win because of Jake Fromm's late passing and Brian Kelly's incompetence.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Georgia, who lets face it, has a far superior offensive line, a comparable running back and far superior coaching, tried pounding the rock, got nowhere and was only able to win because of Jake Fromm's late passing and Brian Kelly's incompetence.
not sure kriby is far superior gameday tactician than daz fwiw. he's an amazing recruiter (maybe best hc recruiter around) but his action / record in close games is not good at all.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Georgia, who lets face it, has a far superior offensive line, a comparable running back and far superior coaching, tried pounding the rock, got nowhere and was only able to win because of Jake Fromm's late passing and Brian Kelly's incompetence.
not sure kriby is far superior gameday tactician than daz fwiw. he's an amazing recruiter (maybe best hc recruiter around) but his action / record in close games is not good at all.
That South Carolina game was a Daz level of disaster as far as in-game coaching
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Georgia, who lets face it, has a far superior offensive line, a comparable running back and far superior coaching, tried pounding the rock, got nowhere and was only able to win because of Jake Fromm's late passing and Brian Kelly's incompetence.
not sure kriby is far superior gameday tactician than daz fwiw. he's an amazing recruiter (maybe best hc recruiter around) but his action / record in close games is not good at all.
That South Carolina game was a Daz level of disaster as far as in-game coaching
You think he is that bad? I don't think he is great or special, but the South Carolina game aside, he seems to do alright. He completely out coached Kelly in the 3rd quarter of the ND-UGA game and while I have little respect for Kelly's coaching acumen, I think he is definitely better than Daz. He also made adjustments that baffled Dan Mullen and again, while I don't think Mullen is a coaching genius, I think he is better than Daz by a good margin.
BCMurt09 {l Wrote}:I thought Dick was a Notre Dame fan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests