eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
Does it matter? And why?
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
Does it matter? And why?
Huh?
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
Does it matter? And why?
Huh?
He's a role player on a team not going anywhere.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
Does it matter? And why?
Huh?
He's a role player on a team not going anywhere.
Because I’d rather see BC win than lose?
I’m also going to Brooklyn next week.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
Does it matter? And why?
Huh?
He's a role player on a team not going anywhere.
Because I’d rather see BC win than lose?
I’m also going to Brooklyn next week.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Had they won this past weekend, Saturday plus a tourney win would have had them dancing.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:I think they can jump cuse & fsu (win on saturday / cuse lose vs clem) but that still gets them to 10 which would play pitt on Tuesday
win on tues and they're playing someone in the 5/6/7 range (ncst, u, vt, ville)
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:When we look at ACC tournament scenarios, I think of the bottom 3 Wake is the only team with enough life at this point to beat us. Beyond that, probably don't want to play ND or Louisville in the next round but probably not worth the effort to look that far ahead
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:I asked this in previous thread but don’t think anyone answered. Has anyone gone to Tuesday in Brooklyn for ACCT ? Stubhub is showing $6 general admission for both sessions that day. Can that be right, $6 to get in and effectively sit anywhere in arena ?
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:When we look at ACC tournament scenarios, I think of the bottom 3 Wake is the only team with enough life at this point to beat us. Beyond that, probably don't want to play ND or Louisville in the next round but probably not worth the effort to look that far ahead
I think Wake would probably beat BC or at least it would be scary.
Pitt and GT are pretty awful.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:When we look at ACC tournament scenarios, I think of the bottom 3 Wake is the only team with enough life at this point to beat us. Beyond that, probably don't want to play ND or Louisville in the next round but probably not worth the effort to look that far ahead
I think Wake would probably beat BC or at least it would be scary.
Pitt and GT are pretty awful.
I think BC would beat Wake this year. But just guessing, no real basis.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Mitchell on crutches isn’t a good sign
Does it matter? And why?
Huh?
He's a role player on a team not going anywhere.
bchockey04 {l Wrote}:but he's arguably the best defender/rebounder/energy guy on the team.
commavegarage {l Wrote}:fwiw (and i honestly have no idea how much it truly is worth), i gotta imagine it'd be a pretty big red flag to any coach worth his salt if we fired a coach who went 18-13 (8-10) after going 0-18 and 2-16 the year before.
to me this is a lot different than the wake coach was in the first four and went 19-14 (9-9) last year. as a wake fan, this year i would be expecting progression beyond that, so 11-18 (4-13) would be a fireable offense to me.
similarly, if jimmy mac does not improve upon his record from this season next season and make the ncaa's, i would imagine he will be axed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests