twballgame9 {l Wrote}:It is not crazy. It's also not likely.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:It is not crazy. It's also not likely.
@ UVA (#16), @ UNC (#7), @ Lville, @ Cuse (x2) , ND (#18) (x2), Miami (#6) (x2), FSU (#19) (x2) - You need to scrape out 3 or 4 of these.
Clemson, Wake, GT, @ Pitt, @ NCST - You probably need 4 of these at minimum. If you won all 5 it would really help.
Add a Wednesday win in the ACCT and you're probably there.
Still feels like about a 2 seed in the NIT. With Hawkins this is a NCAA team.
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Yes, he's giving us the auto-bid. We're below the last 4 in, implying we wouldn't get an at-large.
That said, we might have a case if we can maybe go 8-10, beat one more big-gum, and not lose to CCSU, Richmond, Pitt, or GT. In that case, we'd have 2 great wins, 0 bad losses, and a bunch of meh in the middle. Also need Nebraska to stay on the right side of the bad loss cutoff. 8 wins in the ACC seems like a big ask to me though.
thebs19 {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Yes, he's giving us the auto-bid. We're below the last 4 in, implying we wouldn't get an at-large.
That said, we might have a case if we can maybe go 8-10, beat one more big-gum, and not lose to CCSU, Richmond, Pitt, or GT. In that case, we'd have 2 great wins, 0 bad losses, and a bunch of meh in the middle. Also need Nebraska to stay on the right side of the bad loss cutoff. 8 wins in the ACC seems like a big ask to me though.
Right, thats what I was seeing. Last 4 without playin and Last 4 in are all above us on the seeding line.
We wouldn't be ranked among "First 4 out" or "Next 4 out" since we're "in", technically, but given Providence's placement in "Next 4 out", have to imagine we are well below them as an at large resume is concerned (even with Duke on there).
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:thebs19 {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Yes, he's giving us the auto-bid. We're below the last 4 in, implying we wouldn't get an at-large.
That said, we might have a case if we can maybe go 8-10, beat one more big-gum, and not lose to CCSU, Richmond, Pitt, or GT. In that case, we'd have 2 great wins, 0 bad losses, and a bunch of meh in the middle. Also need Nebraska to stay on the right side of the bad loss cutoff. 8 wins in the ACC seems like a big ask to me though.
Right, thats what I was seeing. Last 4 without playin and Last 4 in are all above us on the seeding line.
We wouldn't be ranked among "First 4 out" or "Next 4 out" since we're "in", technically, but given Providence's placement in "Next 4 out", have to imagine we are well below them as an at large resume is concerned (even with Duke on there).
That’s my fault (and incredibly stupid on the part of Lunardi).
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:thebs19 {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Yes, he's giving us the auto-bid. We're below the last 4 in, implying we wouldn't get an at-large.
That said, we might have a case if we can maybe go 8-10, beat one more big-gum, and not lose to CCSU, Richmond, Pitt, or GT. In that case, we'd have 2 great wins, 0 bad losses, and a bunch of meh in the middle. Also need Nebraska to stay on the right side of the bad loss cutoff. 8 wins in the ACC seems like a big ask to me though.
Right, thats what I was seeing. Last 4 without playin and Last 4 in are all above us on the seeding line.
We wouldn't be ranked among "First 4 out" or "Next 4 out" since we're "in", technically, but given Providence's placement in "Next 4 out", have to imagine we are well below them as an at large resume is concerned (even with Duke on there).
That’s my fault (and incredibly stupid on the part of Lunardi).
Eh, he pretends that Vermont won't choke in the conference championship most years as well. What's he supposed to do, just guess the auto-bid?
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:thebs19 {l Wrote}:Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Yes, he's giving us the auto-bid. We're below the last 4 in, implying we wouldn't get an at-large.
That said, we might have a case if we can maybe go 8-10, beat one more big-gum, and not lose to CCSU, Richmond, Pitt, or GT. In that case, we'd have 2 great wins, 0 bad losses, and a bunch of meh in the middle. Also need Nebraska to stay on the right side of the bad loss cutoff. 8 wins in the ACC seems like a big ask to me though.
Right, thats what I was seeing. Last 4 without playin and Last 4 in are all above us on the seeding line.
We wouldn't be ranked among "First 4 out" or "Next 4 out" since we're "in", technically, but given Providence's placement in "Next 4 out", have to imagine we are well below them as an at large resume is concerned (even with Duke on there).
That’s my fault (and incredibly stupid on the part of Lunardi).
Uh yea this
Eh, he pretends that Vermont won't choke in the conference championship most years as well. What's he supposed to do, just guess the auto-bid?
or assume the acc auto-bid will come from one of the 7-10 teams that qualify as an at-large
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests