ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
ILikeBC {l Wrote}: the OL definitely enjoyed blocking for him.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}: the OL definitely enjoyed blocking for him.
what does this mean?
ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}: the OL definitely enjoyed blocking for him.
what does this mean?
Maybe he is saying Wade is a better fit for the program?
by rktbrkr on Sat Nov 27, 2010 3:03 pm
Hits the hole quicker than Montel - and he's bigger & faster, 40+ carries without a fumble, the OL definitely enjoyed blocking for him
ILikeBC {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
Or Wadedebago
angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
Or Wadedebago
No
HJS {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
Or Wadedebago
No
What about Wadeabego?
HJS {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
Or Wadedebago
No
What about Wadeabego?
Logitano {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
Or Wadedebago
No
What about Wadeabego?
Wade and the dago?
angrychicken {l Wrote}:Logitano {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:No, Wadebago 1.0
Please change this to "Wade-ebago". The way you have it, it reads like either "wade bago" or "wad ebago", both of which are wrong.
How about Waddebago
Or Wadedebago
No
What about Wadeabego?
Wade and the dago?
BC has been on the Dagobago for the past 8 years.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:Maybe towles is actually better and there just aren't any good quarterbacks on the roster, like the last 4 times we did this.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:Maybe towles is actually better and there just aren't any good quarterbacks on the roster, like the last 4 times we did this.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
Yeah, remember how bad that guy was at BC?
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
Yeah, remember how bad that guy was at BC?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 223 guests