eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
I agree with this, but being a private school with limited money (kind of even tho they have the money) it would be prudent to see if local area corporations could contribute (or someone like Under Armour could pitch in some money). While naming rights would remain with BC/high donor, there could always be signage/advertising/goodwill for any corporations that were to contribute (i.e. GE who is moving shortly).
New Balance is right in Brighton, Bates should reach out.
commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
2001Eagle {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
Peak whale pants.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:fwiw, i wouldnt ever fill in the corners and put a dome over alumni if it came at the expense of changing the name from alumalumni to papa johns tuesday night special field at mountain dew stadium
Not that it would happen (because there would be no benefit to the sponsor), but would you have an issue with it if it were Fidelity Investments Field, State Street Field or GAMCO Investors Field or something like that?
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:If we pass the hat, the stadium should be called "The Nexus"
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
I agree with this, but being a private school with limited money (kind of even tho they have the money) it would be prudent to see if local area corporations could contribute (or someone like Under Armour could pitch in some money). While naming rights would remain with BC/high donor, there could always be signage/advertising/goodwill for any corporations that were to contribute (i.e. GE who is moving shortly).
New Balance is right in Brighton, Bates should reach out.
with our under armor contract, I see them jumping right on board.
football is not one of their areas of focus. baseball, absolutely. hockey/lax (through their warrior brand), sure. soccer - why not. basketball, a little. but football... not so much
BCEagles66 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
I agree with this, but being a private school with limited money (kind of even tho they have the money) it would be prudent to see if local area corporations could contribute (or someone like Under Armour could pitch in some money). While naming rights would remain with BC/high donor, there could always be signage/advertising/goodwill for any corporations that were to contribute (i.e. GE who is moving shortly).
New Balance is right in Brighton, Bates should reach out.
with our under armor contract, I see them jumping right on board.
football is not one of their areas of focus. baseball, absolutely. hockey/lax (through their warrior brand), sure. soccer - why not. basketball, a little. but football... not so much
Assume you are talking about New Balance not being involved in football. Agreed, but the CEO is a BC parent & is worth over a billion....
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:BCEagles66 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
I agree with this, but being a private school with limited money (kind of even tho they have the money) it would be prudent to see if local area corporations could contribute (or someone like Under Armour could pitch in some money). While naming rights would remain with BC/high donor, there could always be signage/advertising/goodwill for any corporations that were to contribute (i.e. GE who is moving shortly).
New Balance is right in Brighton, Bates should reach out.
with our under armor contract, I see them jumping right on board.
football is not one of their areas of focus. baseball, absolutely. hockey/lax (through their warrior brand), sure. soccer - why not. basketball, a little. but football... not so much
Assume you are talking about New Balance not being involved in football. Agreed, but the CEO is a BC parent & is worth over a billion....
He could have been talking abut BC instead of New Balance, and it would have worked too. Well, not really with lax, but Gene D disciples can dream.
BCEagles66 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle33 {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:i have a problem with naming our athletic buildings anything other than exactly what we want them to be
I agree with this, but being a private school with limited money (kind of even tho they have the money) it would be prudent to see if local area corporations could contribute (or someone like Under Armour could pitch in some money). While naming rights would remain with BC/high donor, there could always be signage/advertising/goodwill for any corporations that were to contribute (i.e. GE who is moving shortly).
New Balance is right in Brighton, Bates should reach out.
with our under armor contract, I see them jumping right on board.
football is not one of their areas of focus. baseball, absolutely. hockey/lax (through their warrior brand), sure. soccer - why not. basketball, a little. but football... not so much
Assume you are talking about New Balance not being involved in football. Agreed, but the CEO is a BC parent & is worth over a billion....
HJS {l Wrote}:Bates is so bad it is at the point of unintentional comedy.
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/coll ... low_in_acc
ILikeBC {l Wrote}:"duda" on TOS says a facility is "100% confirmed" from an "impeccable source" and that an announcement is coming in the next 30 days.
Not sure of his credibility on the poopee scale
HJS {l Wrote}:Bates is so bad it is at the point of unintentional comedy.
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/coll ... low_in_acc
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:ILikeBC {l Wrote}:"duda" on TOS says a facility is "100% confirmed" from an "impeccable source" and that an announcement is coming in the next 30 days.
I heard all of this as well from credible sources recently.
yes - i also assume it was nick
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC has to go through zoning first for the new indoor field. They use renderings at this point. Once they pass zoning, they will do the permit drawings needed to apply for a building permit. The building will not be built until the Flynn rec plex is removed. That will not happen until the new student rec center is finished which is 2 years away.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 234 guests