eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}: I also think epstein's evaluation of the impact on recruiting of 11-20 without Hanlan and 16-17 with him is grossly exaggerated.
why?
Shit is shit.
The guy was first team all ACC. Your revisionist history of Hanlan is terrible. The current freshman are such a big improvement over the awfulness he was forced to play with last year
He's not good enough to turn what YOU called a single digit win team into what YOU called an NIT/bubble contender. That's fairies and rainbows type shit right there, tin man.
He somehow won 4 games in the ACC last year with a team with less talent than I ever thought was imaginable. Jesus we almost beat UNC playing a walk on at PF at home. Hanlan and one reasonable fifth year and this was an NIT team.
No.