twballgame9 {l Wrote}:You do realize that the literal version of the "smoking gun" metaphor is actually circumstantial evidence, correct?
EagleDave {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:You do realize that the literal version of the "smoking gun" metaphor is actually circumstantial evidence, correct?
Yes, the apparently badly used turn a phrase was that they don't have the murder weapon.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:will there be riots under either ruling?
i vote for riots. boston strong!
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:EagleDave {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:You do realize that the literal version of the "smoking gun" metaphor is actually circumstantial evidence, correct?
Yes, the apparently badly used turn a phrase was that they don't have the murder weapon.
Not much of motive too, right (I have not been paying attention).
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:EagleDave {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:You do realize that the literal version of the "smoking gun" metaphor is actually circumstantial evidence, correct?
Yes, the apparently badly used turn a phrase was that they don't have the murder weapon.
Not much of motive too, right (I have not been paying attention).
That's correct as far as the jury knows. The judge ruled anything related to the double-homicide charges inadmissible a long time ago, so the jury is unaware of the connection.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:I expect Hernandez will be acquitted of murder because he bought the best lawyers, but I think the jury will convict him on the gun charges. Those penalties will keep him behind bars long enough to squash any dreams of playing football again, which is the harshest punishment you can give him.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Do me a favor and don't rely on the "I had no motive" defense when you kill someone. Thanks in advance.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I just won my bet for two beers. I should bet trials instead of college football.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I just won my bet for two beers. I should bet trials instead of college football.
Colt 45 would be a fitting choice.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I just won my bet for two beers. I should bet trials instead of college football.
Colt 45 would be a fitting choice.
The guy that swore the circumstantial evidence was weak because there was no murder weapon is more of a PBR in a big can guy.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I just won my bet for two beers. I should bet trials instead of college football.
Colt 45 would be a fitting choice.
The guy that swore the circumstantial evidence was weak because there was no murder weapon is more of a PBR in a big can guy.
i see him as more of an apricot sour sort of guy
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I just won my bet for two beers. I should bet trials instead of college football.
Colt 45 would be a fitting choice.
The guy that swore the circumstantial evidence was weak because there was no murder weapon is more of a PBR in a big can guy.
i see him as more of an apricot sour sort of guy
Projection.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I just won my bet for two beers. I should bet trials instead of college football.
Colt 45 would be a fitting choice.
The guy that swore the circumstantial evidence was weak because there was no murder weapon is more of a PBR in a big can guy.
i see him as more of an apricot sour sort of guy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 212 guests