DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:I am not going to judge Daz off this year, it wont be fair to start looking at him until next June, but by this August, I will be curious how things are going.
maxwell22 {l Wrote}:
If Walsh is the answer, why do we need Lowrie or Boyle?
Boyle had offers from Florida and Connecticut. I wonder if he is reconsidering his decision.
That said, this is not a good recruiting year for B.C. . . . and Boyle, according to some , is the highest rated recruit in the class!
maxwell22 {l Wrote}:If Walsh is the answer, why do we need Lowrie or Boyle?
Boyle had offers from Florida and Connecticut. I wonder if he is reconsidering his decision.
That said, this is not a good recruiting year for B.C. . . . and Boyle, according to some , is the highest rated recruit in the class!
Shaddix {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:I am not going to judge Daz off this year, it wont be fair to start looking at him until next June, but by this August, I will be curious how things are going.
Exactly. Even though he couldn't close the deal, Daz beat out big name programs for Julian (who said he would have chose BC if not Toledo). He got Hilliman to put us in his top 5. His staff is impressive. It should be interesting.
Eagle1999 {l Wrote}:Shaddix {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:I am not going to judge Daz off this year, it wont be fair to start looking at him until next June, but by this August, I will be curious how things are going.
Exactly. Even though he couldn't close the deal, Daz beat out big name programs for Julian (who said he would have chose BC if not Toledo). He got Hilliman to put us in his top 5. His staff is impressive. It should be interesting.
Look, Daz couldn't beat out Toledo. To say he beat everyone else is just silly. Hilliman putting us in his top 5 after a visit means the visit wasn't awful and the kid is being respectful. What's impressive about this staff? Shit. Embarassingly, it isn't even complete yet. Why the hell not? Daz can't recruit coaches (who are paid) nevermind sign recruits (who get a free top-level education).
Oh wait, he got the Walsh kid today. Sprinkles on a shit sundae. Taking a MAC kid and jeopardizing one of the few DI recruits we actually have.
Bates - still managing like a MAC AD.
Daz - still recruiting like a MAC coach, bringing in MAC talent athletes.
If you want to take the wait and see approach fine. But there are more signs that the program is going to shit the bed than break TOB's fictitious glass ceiling.
Shaddix {l Wrote}:Eagle1999 {l Wrote}:Shaddix {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:I am not going to judge Daz off this year, it wont be fair to start looking at him until next June, but by this August, I will be curious how things are going.
Exactly. Even though he couldn't close the deal, Daz beat out big name programs for Julian (who said he would have chose BC if not Toledo). He got Hilliman to put us in his top 5. His staff is impressive. It should be interesting.
Look, Daz couldn't beat out Toledo. To say he beat everyone else is just silly. Hilliman putting us in his top 5 after a visit means the visit wasn't awful and the kid is being respectful. What's impressive about this staff? Shit. Embarassingly, it isn't even complete yet. Why the hell not? Daz can't recruit coaches (who are paid) nevermind sign recruits (who get a free top-level education).
Oh wait, he got the Walsh kid today. Sprinkles on a shit sundae. Taking a MAC kid and jeopardizing one of the few DI recruits we actually have.
Bates - still managing like a MAC AD.
Daz - still recruiting like a MAC coach, bringing in MAC talent athletes.
If you want to take the wait and see approach fine. But there are more signs that the program is going to shit the bed than break TOB's fictitious glass ceiling.
He chose Toledo because they were in for him since the beginning. BC beat out Wisconsin, NC State, and Clemson was getting in on the end. Even though its tough to give BC credit in a loss, they did what they could in under 2 months.
This is one of the dumbest posts i've seen on here.
MattTheEagle {l Wrote}:Shaddix {l Wrote}:Eagle1999 {l Wrote}:Shaddix {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:I am not going to judge Daz off this year, it wont be fair to start looking at him until next June, but by this August, I will be curious how things are going.
Exactly. Even though he couldn't close the deal, Daz beat out big name programs for Julian (who said he would have chose BC if not Toledo). He got Hilliman to put us in his top 5. His staff is impressive. It should be interesting.
Look, Daz couldn't beat out Toledo. To say he beat everyone else is just silly. Hilliman putting us in his top 5 after a visit means the visit wasn't awful and the kid is being respectful. What's impressive about this staff? Shit. Embarassingly, it isn't even complete yet. Why the hell not? Daz can't recruit coaches (who are paid) nevermind sign recruits (who get a free top-level education).
Oh wait, he got the Walsh kid today. Sprinkles on a shit sundae. Taking a MAC kid and jeopardizing one of the few DI recruits we actually have.
Bates - still managing like a MAC AD.
Daz - still recruiting like a MAC coach, bringing in MAC talent athletes.
If you want to take the wait and see approach fine. But there are more signs that the program is going to shit the bed than break TOB's fictitious glass ceiling.
He chose Toledo because they were in for him since the beginning. BC beat out Wisconsin, NC State, and Clemson was getting in on the end. Even though its tough to give BC credit in a loss, they did what they could in under 2 months.
This is one of the dumbest posts i've seen on here.
Sorry Shaddix, but I cannot agree with you on this one. Your premise that BC "beat out" other school means is a retarded statement and unverifiable. It means absolutely nothing unless you land a player over other programs that offered. Hats off to Toledo, but zero points for BC.
basselope {l Wrote}:
Obviously, Chase will be the QB this coming fall, but having a little competition at QB for 2014 isn't going to hurt.
In 2014 we will only Bordner who will be a SR, & Suntrup who will be a Jr.
Having 3 QB is this incoming class puts us at 5 which is the ave amount.
On top of that, let's say Boyle wins the QB job in 2014 or 2015.
If that happens, Walsh is athletic enough to move to WR or S and contribute.
bruisertm {l Wrote}:JUCO TE Marvin Fan Fan visited this weekend
[url] http://rutgers.scout.com/a.z?s=183&p=2& ... 61445.html [q/url]
If Walsh is the answer, why do we need Lowrie or Boyle?
Boyle had offers from Florida and Connecticut. I wonder if he is reconsidering his decision.
That said, this is not a good recruiting year for B.C. . . . and Boyle, according to some , is the highest rated recruit in the class!
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:So long as it doesn't push out Boyle or Lowrie, I have no issue with the move at all. It's not, not a position of need even if their is a glut in this class. We do need running backs and cornerbacks and defensive linemen more immediately but we need lots of things. Maybe Fan Fan (ha) will come in at DE if he signs on.
HJS {l Wrote}:That said, I think we can stop pretending that Daziani isn't recruiting Temple verbals "because they were recruited to play in the Big East and just aren't good enough to play in the ACC." Very simply, that's a lie. If Vitamin A is such a superstar recruiter, there would clearly be talent at Temple good enough for the ACC. The reason I think he isn't grabbing anyone from Temple is because he promised he wouldn't. I actually don't have much problem with that, but, I know others do.
"I had a relationship with coach Addazio back when he was recruiting me at Temple," Walsh said. "So when they were at Boston College and started showing interest I was pretty excited. Everything happened pretty quickly. The visit went really well. I liked the school a lot."
31southst {l Wrote}:FWIW, Walsh had the following quote:"I had a relationship with coach Addazio back when he was recruiting me at Temple," Walsh said. "So when they were at Boston College and started showing interest I was pretty excited. Everything happened pretty quickly. The visit went really well. I liked the school a lot."
Walsh's rivals profile doesn't list Temple at all, so I wonder if Walsh simply knew he wanted to stay local if he wasn't going to be playing in a big 5 conference.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:On what are you basing the conclusion the non-recruitment of temple players is based on a promise not to and where did the quote "because they were recruited to play in the Big East and just aren't good enough to play in the ACC come from"?
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:The Rowland guy from EA says he doesn't think BC is recruiting any Temple players (including Terry) because the staff doesn't think they are good enough to play for BC. While this is conjecture and (I doubt true in some cases), it is still better than the perceived attitude of the former staff.
HJS {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:On what are you basing the conclusion the non-recruitment of temple players is based on a promise not to and where did the quote "because they were recruited to play in the Big East and just aren't good enough to play in the ACC come from"?
Timestamp January 9, 2013:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:The Rowland guy from EA says he doesn't think BC is recruiting any Temple players (including Terry) because the staff doesn't think they are good enough to play for BC. While this is conjecture and (I doubt true in some cases), it is still better than the perceived attitude of the former staff.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:On what are you basing the conclusion the non-recruitment of temple players is based on a promise not to and where did the quote "because they were recruited to play in the Big East and just aren't good enough to play in the ACC come from"?
Timestamp January 9, 2013:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:The Rowland guy from EA says he doesn't think BC is recruiting any Temple players (including Terry) because the staff doesn't think they are good enough to play for BC. While this is conjecture and (I doubt true in some cases), it is still better than the perceived attitude of the former staff.
So on what are you basing the conclusion that the non-recruitment of temple players is based on a promise not to?
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:On what are you basing the conclusion the non-recruitment of temple players is based on a promise not to and where did the quote "because they were recruited to play in the Big East and just aren't good enough to play in the ACC come from"?
Timestamp January 9, 2013:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:The Rowland guy from EA says he doesn't think BC is recruiting any Temple players (including Terry) because the staff doesn't think they are good enough to play for BC. While this is conjecture and (I doubt true in some cases), it is still better than the perceived attitude of the former staff.
So on what are you basing the conclusion that the non-recruitment of temple players is based on a promise not to?
swofford is a bad negotiator?
Shaddix {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:I am not going to judge Daz off this year, it wont be fair to start looking at him until next June, but by this August, I will be curious how things are going.
Exactly. Even though he couldn't close the deal, Daz beat out big name programs for Julian (who said he would have chose BC if not Toledo). He got Hilliman to put us in his top 5. His staff is impressive. It should be interesting.
bruisertm {l Wrote}:JUCO TE Marvin Fan Fan visited this weekend
[url] http://rutgers.scout.com/a.z?s=183&p=2& ... 61445.html [q/url]
BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:Raphael Webb said on the twitter box he's going to commit Wednesday
Shaddix {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:Raphael Webb said on the twitter box he's going to commit Wednesday
It's BC vs Minnesota. FAU didn't wait and got a different running back
JConman {l Wrote}:Shaddix {l Wrote}:BCSUPERFAN22 {l Wrote}:Raphael Webb said on the twitter box he's going to commit Wednesday
It's BC vs Minnesota. FAU didn't wait and got a different running back
Someone on the other site said he's likely visiting Vandy this weekend and will go to Vandy if offered.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 248 guests