commavegarage {l Wrote}:Without the coward, I bet we win (and we should expect to win) 3 of 4.
We should absolutely expect to win 3 and I think it'd be a huge disappointment if we don't.
commavegarage {l Wrote}:Without the coward, I bet we win (and we should expect to win) 3 of 4.
2013 non-division ACC opponents: FSU (UM, Pitt), Clem (GT, Va), NCSt (UNC, Duke), Md (Va, VT ), SU (Pitt, GT ), WF (Duke, UM), BC (VT, UNC)
Walsh601 {l Wrote}:2013 non-division ACC opponents: FSU (UM, Pitt), Clem (GT, Va), NCSt (UNC, Duke), Md (Va, VT ), SU (Pitt, GT ), WF (Duke, UM), BC (VT, UNC)
https://twitter.com/McMurphyESPN/status/289763768790036482
So for 2013:
at Clemson
Florida State
at Maryland
NC State
at Syracuse
Wake Forest
Virginia Tech
at North Carolina
Full ACC grid: http://grfx.cstv.com/photos/schools/acc/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/2013-14/misc_non_event/ACCFB13-opponents.pdf
31southst {l Wrote}:Overall schedule:
Home
Stony Brook
Army
NM St
FSU
NC State
WF
VT
Away
USC
Clemson
Maryland
Cuse
UNC
Without thinking about this at all, this reinforces my thought that a bowl game is a very reasonable goal. If Daz is a decent hire or better(and I don't particularly think he is, but I'll give him the benefit for now), I think it's fair to categorize the games as follows:
Should win: Stony Brook, Army, NM State
Winnable: NC State, WF, VT, Maryland, Cuse
Unlikely: FSU, USC, Clemson, UNC
bignick33 {l Wrote}:Is 9/14 for USC 100% confirmed?
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:Is 9/14 for USC 100% confirmed?
yes, donkey cap
Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.
Did they drop the fake rivalry game?
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.
Did they drop the fake rivalry game?
They did not. In that grid the "primary crossover" games are all the same "rivalry" matchups (plus Cuse-Pitt) as before. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.
DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:DomingoOrtiz {l Wrote}:Each ACC team will play eight conference games in football (four home and four away), six games within their division (three home, three away) and two games (one home, one away) with crossover opponents from the opposite division.
Did they drop the fake rivalry game?
They did not. In that grid the "primary crossover" games are all the same "rivalry" matchups (plus Cuse-Pitt) as before. I think it's set to continue, meaning a team plays every other non-division opponent at home once every like 34 years.
That sucks. Hopefully changes will be made when Louisville replaces Maryland.
mezmrin {l Wrote}:rumor out of tClemson is that the ACC is in current discussions with all the member schools to realign the divisions into a north/south starting in 2015 or later. no word as to how well it's being received by all, but it is definitely in discussion at the moment.
MF73-Eleazar {l Wrote}:mezmrin {l Wrote}:rumor out of tClemson is that the ACC is in current discussions with all the member schools to realign the divisions into a north/south starting in 2015 or later. no word as to how well it's being received by all, but it is definitely in discussion at the moment.
That would be awesome. Would the northern teams be placed in the "Sheman Division"?
claver2010 {l Wrote}:So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?
There's no way we're playing @ NMST
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:So according to the heights editor, the nm st game is on the road? WTF?
There's no way we're playing @ NMST
The Boston College football team will play six away games in 2013, as its matchup with New Mexico State will be played at Aggie Memorial Stadium. The Eagles are scheduled to travel out to Las Cruces, N.M. on the weekend of Nov. 9 to play the non-conference game, a BC source has confirmed to The Heights.
This gives BC two separate west-coast trips during the 2013 season, as it also plays at Southern California on Sept. 14. Additionally, new head coach Steve Addazio will lead his team to away games at Clemson, Maryland, Syracuse, and North Carolina.
The six games to be played at Alumni Stadium are against Stony Brook, Army, Florida State, North Carolina State, Wake Forest, and Virginia Tech.
Walsh601 {l Wrote}:The Boston College football team will play six away games in 2013, as its matchup with New Mexico State will be played at Aggie Memorial Stadium. The Eagles are scheduled to travel out to Las Cruces, N.M. on the weekend of Nov. 9 to play the non-conference game, a BC source has confirmed to The Heights.
This gives BC two separate west-coast trips during the 2013 season, as it also plays at Southern California on Sept. 14. Additionally, new head coach Steve Addazio will lead his team to away games at Clemson, Maryland, Syracuse, and North Carolina.
The six games to be played at Alumni Stadium are against Stony Brook, Army, Florida State, North Carolina State, Wake Forest, and Virginia Tech.
http://www.bcheightssports.com/2013/01/26/six-away-games-for-bc-in-2013/
Between Addazio and this, not a good start for Master Bates.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 196 guests