claver2010 wrote:As long as we're having fun with the Bs
2
claver2010 wrote:As long as we're having fun with the Bs















flyingelvii wrote:Well the Flyers-Pens series starting next week just got a whole lot more interesting.










claver2010 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:Well the Flyers-Pens series starting next week just got a whole lot more interesting.
To say the least



















flyingelvii wrote:Nope. Not sure if I'd really want him back if he were available given both the fragility of his head and lack of conditioning. Definitely don't want this to turn into Marc Savard 2.0.



DomingoOrtiz wrote:flyingelvii wrote:Nope. Not sure if I'd really want him back if he were available given both the fragility of his head and lack of conditioning. Definitely don't want this to turn into Marc Savard 2.0.
That is sad. How about McQuaid?











bignick33 wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:flyingelvii wrote:Nope. Not sure if I'd really want him back if he were available given both the fragility of his head and lack of conditioning. Definitely don't want this to turn into Marc Savard 2.0.
That is sad. How about McQuaid?
McQuaid is fine, or so they say. They're claiming he wasn't concussed. I believe he practiced today.
























claver2010 wrote:Did AngryDick write this article? http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/wait-mike-milbury-just-realized-sidney-crosby-isn-140838671.html;_ylt=Ai_c6rcEm5EGprNkkbpNZ6aRbcp_;_ylu=X3oDMTFkdWplaGJwBG1pdANCbG9ncyBJbmRleARwb3MDNjgEc2VjA01lZGlhQmxvZ0luZGV4VGVtcA--;_ylg=X3oDMTFvcGs0cnBnBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANibG9nBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25zBHRlc3QD;_ylv=3#more-29175


































claver2010 wrote:Philly with another impressive effort last night.












eagle9903 wrote:claver2010 wrote:Philly with another impressive effort last night.
Suck john kruk's plastic ball Claver.
The Rangers absolutely have the Flyer's number and last night the Flyers were down to 3 of their top 6 defenseman. I will be rooting hard for the menstrating OJs in the first round so that I don't have to see the ninth in a row in the playoffs. I do think with Grossmann back they play better than they did last night, Bryzgalov wasn't as bad as the box score indicates as the D was truly miserable.

















flyingelvii wrote:Danny Briere is a little bitch of a human being and anybody that actively cheers him sucks, as his recent comments reiterated. I viewed Mike Richards was in the same vein. For some reason nobody ever seems to call them out for being cheap. At least Briere is clutch in the playoffs.












eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:Danny Briere is a little bitch of a human being and anybody that actively cheers him sucks, as his recent comments reiterated. I viewed Mike Richards was in the same vein. For some reason nobody ever seems to call them out for being cheap. At least Briere is clutch in the playoffs.
A lot of Flyers fans will admit Briere is a very dirty player and is very sneaky about it. He's very similar to Gerbe (in the NHL) in this regard. I think his size requires it for effectiveness. He also gets called for it all the damned time, he's got the 5th most PIM on the flyers. The current Penguins are the worst thing to happen to the NHL, ever. I don't like "He was trying to hurt me" type comments as a rule, but if you don't think Crosby/Malkin get MJ in the mid 90s treatment from the officials and thus any kind of gamesmanship is fair against the Pens I don't know what to tell you. I'm also not sure I'd describe Richards as a little bitch exactly as he backed his dirty play up and would fight pretty much anyone, but he's a King now so go nuts.











flyingelvii wrote:Danny Briere is a little bitch of a human being and anybody that actively cheers him sucks, as his recent comments reiterated. I viewed Mike Richards was in the same vein. For some reason nobody ever seems to call them out for being cheap. At least Briere is clutch in the playoffs.












eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:Danny Briere is a little bitch of a human being and anybody that actively cheers him sucks, as his recent comments reiterated. I viewed Mike Richards was in the same vein. For some reason nobody ever seems to call them out for being cheap. At least Briere is clutch in the playoffs.
I am confused by a Bruins fan tangentially defending the house that Matt Cooke built.











bignick33 wrote:eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:Danny Briere is a little bitch of a human being and anybody that actively cheers him sucks, as his recent comments reiterated. I viewed Mike Richards was in the same vein. For some reason nobody ever seems to call them out for being cheap. At least Briere is clutch in the playoffs.
I am confused by a Bruins fan tangentially defending the house that Matt Cooke built.
He doesn't like Randy Jones either?
















flyingelvii wrote:It's an airing of grievances. And I think Danny Briere has a douchy looking face that is similarly shared by his kid.
I'm not understanding the Matt Cooke part unless you meant it as a means of cap space gained by Savard's injury.












eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:It's an airing of grievances. And I think Danny Briere has a douchy looking face that is similarly shared by his kid.
I'm not understanding the Matt Cooke part unless you meant it as a means of cap space gained by Savard's injury.
I intended to mean that by airing your Briere grievances following my Penguins grievances, in light of the recent tension between the Penguins and Briere, you were sort of defending the Penguins, whose high douchiness I attribute the combined efforts of Super Mario and Matt Cooke. Whereby, you were transitively defending Matt Cooke who broke Savards brain.











eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:It's an airing of grievances. And I think Danny Briere has a douchy looking face that is similarly shared by his kid.
I'm not understanding the Matt Cooke part unless you meant it as a means of cap space gained by Savard's injury.
I intended to mean that by airing your Briere grievances following my Penguins grievances, in light of the recent tension between the Penguins and Briere, you were sort of defending the Penguins, whose high douchiness I attribute the combined efforts of Super Mario and Matt Cooke. Whereby, you were transitively defending Matt Cooke who broke Savards brain.










claver2010 wrote:eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:It's an airing of grievances. And I think Danny Briere has a douchy looking face that is similarly shared by his kid.
I'm not understanding the Matt Cooke part unless you meant it as a means of cap space gained by Savard's injury.
I intended to mean that by airing your Briere grievances following my Penguins grievances, in light of the recent tension between the Penguins and Briere, you were sort of defending the Penguins, whose high douchiness I attribute the combined efforts of Super Mario and Matt Cooke. Whereby, you were transitively defending Matt Cooke who broke Savards brain.
Which I'm sure transitively can be traced back to a fat asian in Florida












eagle9903 wrote:flyingelvii wrote:It's an airing of grievances. And I think Danny Briere has a douchy looking face that is similarly shared by his kid.
I'm not understanding the Matt Cooke part unless you meant it as a means of cap space gained by Savard's injury.
I intended to mean that by airing your Briere grievances following my Penguins grievances, in light of the recent tension between the Penguins and Briere, you were sort of defending the Penguins, whose high douchiness I attribute the combined efforts of Super Mario and Matt Cooke. Whereby, you were transitively defending Matt Cooke who broke Savards brain.




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests