Kuechly & the Draft

Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby eagle9903 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:44 pm

please do not let kuechly go to tampa with shady.

edit: crisis averted
Image
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 10975
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 2209

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby eagle9903 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:55 pm

9th is great, Panthers could be good. Good matchups with Matty Ice
Image
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 10975
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 2209

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby cvilleagle on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:55 pm

Carolina. Damnit, was hoping he'd fall one more spot to my Bills.
Image
User avatar
cvilleagle
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 6600
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:14 pm
Karma: 1154

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby apbc12 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:56 pm

He gets to live in Charlotte!

Seriously, congratulations to Kuechly. No one works harder or deserves it more.
Image
User avatar
apbc12
Higgins Hall
 
Posts: 4547
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:31 pm
Karma: 1750

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby RegalBCeagle on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:56 pm

branchinator wrote:While the point about the rookie scale is true, I don't think I'd be willing to trade 27/31 for a pick in the 10-12 range.


Unfortunately the Pats will trade 1 of those picks for future picks (probably the team's #1 next year and their #3 or #4 next year) and use the other of the two picks to take either an OL or a TE, even though they clearly need a pass rusher and/or secondary help.

One of these f-ing years Belichichick will go for a top flight guy instead of the f-ing "value" that has kept them a few plays away from winning another Superbowl.
User avatar
RegalBCeagle
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1839
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:55 pm
Karma: 111

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby uconnbaseball on Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:59 pm

Congratulations. He's a fun player to watch.
Image
uconnbaseball
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 7:33 pm
Karma: 41

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby Bryn Mawr Eagle on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:01 pm

uconnbaseball wrote:Congratulations. He's a fun player to watch.



I never get bored seeing your sig.
User avatar
Bryn Mawr Eagle
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2742
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:41 pm
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Karma: 683

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby cvilleagle on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:02 pm

There's something about the new rookie wage scale, etc. that makes 11 way better than 10, but I can't remember what.
Image
User avatar
cvilleagle
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 6600
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:14 pm
Karma: 1154

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby BC923 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:05 pm

Him and Beason will make for a pretty scary set of linebackers.
Second Hottest Program in Newton!!!!!!
http://newton.patch.com/articles/new-se ... h-football
BC923
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2280
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:11 pm
Karma: 367

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby BCSUPERFAN22 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:07 pm

Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2
Image
BCSUPERFAN22
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 931
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 9:21 pm
Location: Fairfield, Connecticut
Karma: 16

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby Bryn Mawr Eagle on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:11 pm

BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!
User avatar
Bryn Mawr Eagle
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2742
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:41 pm
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Karma: 683

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby HJS on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:57 pm

RegalBCeagle wrote:
branchinator wrote:While the point about the rookie scale is true, I don't think I'd be willing to trade 27/31 for a pick in the 10-12 range.


Unfortunately the Pats will trade 1 of those picks for future picks (probably the team's #1 next year and their #3 or #4 next year) and use the other of the two picks to take either an OL or a TE, even though they clearly need a pass rusher and/or secondary help.

One of these f-ing years Belichichick will go for a top flight guy instead of the f-ing "value" that has kept them a few plays away from winning another Superbowl.

As I posted before the draft, with the new salary structure in place, if you see a player you like, you spend picks to trade up and draft him. Perhaps the Pats didn't value Keeks as much as was rumored. After all, Keeks is an MLB in a 4-3 (as opposed to the normal Pats D of a 3-4). Nonetheless, I agree with what you are saying... too often the Pats (who have been that 1 player away from winning it all) have settled for depth and value. There is nothing wrong with that being your normal strategy. But, once in a while you need to make that splash when you are certain of a projected player.
User avatar
HJS
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 8379
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:08 pm
Karma: 5

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby EagleDave on Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:58 pm

Bryn Mawr Eagle wrote:
BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!


Maybe Monday. Hingham Little League has a big weekend ahead, Spaz is preparing by taking a 3 day weekend.
Is this the 5 o'clock free crack giveaway?
User avatar
EagleDave
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3300
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:09 am
Location: Bridgewater, MA
Karma: 282

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby claver2010 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:07 pm

HJS wrote:
claver2010 wrote:
RegalBCeagle wrote:
bignick33 wrote:Apparently, the Pats covet Luke:

https://twitter.com/#!/RapSheet/status/ ... 3360765952



What does it say?



Pointless, what they're going to package both their 1s plus to get him? Nope

Are you saying they shouldn't package their picks at the very end of the first round to grab one of the best 7 talents in the draft (Luck, RG3, Kalil, Blackmon, Richardson, Keeks and Claiborne)? I completely disagree. With the salary structure in place, those early round picks are much, much, MUCH more valuable than they were just a couple of years ago.



Sorry just saw this.

There was no chance the Pats would've done this it's completely against everything we've seen from Belichick & the draft

Moving from 27 to 21, not a huge deal. Moving from 27 to 8, huge deal
Frank Spaziani will lead us to the Orange Bowl within the next three years - :pickle 11/11/10

“We stress trophies at BC. We talk a lot about them. That’s your legacy." - York 3/17/12
User avatar
claver2010
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11616
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 1063

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby HJS on Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:39 pm

The Pats old theory of stockpiling later picks worked great in the old world where teams killed their cap by drafting kids high. But, this is a different world now with the much needed rookie structure. You will once again start to see the natural progression of teams rising and falling (which is what the NFL always meant to have happen via the draft). These last 5-10 years saw teams at the top and bottom languish mainly because the draft was killing the worst teams.

Thats said, the Pats ultimately got into the whole trading up swing of things. To get Jones they traded a 3rd to move 6 spots. Strangely, to get Hightower, they traded only a 4th to move up 10.

Is it me or does this draft simply underwhelm with talent? The top 7 players seem excellent. You might make a case for an additional 5 or so as legit first rounders. But, outside of that, I am incredibly underwhelmed. Perhaps, it was because so many kids left school early trying to beat the salary imposition.
User avatar
HJS
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 8379
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:08 pm
Karma: 5

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby RegalBCeagle on Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:40 pm

HJS wrote:
RegalBCeagle wrote:
branchinator wrote:While the point about the rookie scale is true, I don't think I'd be willing to trade 27/31 for a pick in the 10-12 range.


Unfortunately the Pats will trade 1 of those picks for future picks (probably the team's #1 next year and their #3 or #4 next year) and use the other of the two picks to take either an OL or a TE, even though they clearly need a pass rusher and/or secondary help.

One of these f-ing years Belichichick will go for a top flight guy instead of the f-ing "value" that has kept them a few plays away from winning another Superbowl.

As I posted before the draft, with the new salary structure in place, if you see a player you like, you spend picks to trade up and draft him. Perhaps the Pats didn't value Keeks as much as was rumored. After all, Keeks is an MLB in a 4-3 (as opposed to the normal Pats D of a 3-4). Nonetheless, I agree with what you are saying... too often the Pats (who have been that 1 player away from winning it all) have settled for depth and value. There is nothing wrong with that being your normal strategy. But, once in a while you need to make that splash when you are certain of a projected player.


I reverse-psychologied Belichick into trading up twice with their first two picks, and taking a pass-rushing DE and a LB. This goes against everything they've done during their stretch of success. Let's hope they've strengthened areas of weakness and these picks pay off.
User avatar
RegalBCeagle
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1839
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 12:55 pm
Karma: 111

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby bignick33 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:00 pm

RegalBCeagle wrote:
HJS wrote:
RegalBCeagle wrote:
branchinator wrote:While the point about the rookie scale is true, I don't think I'd be willing to trade 27/31 for a pick in the 10-12 range.


Unfortunately the Pats will trade 1 of those picks for future picks (probably the team's #1 next year and their #3 or #4 next year) and use the other of the two picks to take either an OL or a TE, even though they clearly need a pass rusher and/or secondary help.

One of these f-ing years Belichichick will go for a top flight guy instead of the f-ing "value" that has kept them a few plays away from winning another Superbowl.

As I posted before the draft, with the new salary structure in place, if you see a player you like, you spend picks to trade up and draft him. Perhaps the Pats didn't value Keeks as much as was rumored. After all, Keeks is an MLB in a 4-3 (as opposed to the normal Pats D of a 3-4). Nonetheless, I agree with what you are saying... too often the Pats (who have been that 1 player away from winning it all) have settled for depth and value. There is nothing wrong with that being your normal strategy. But, once in a while you need to make that splash when you are certain of a projected player.


I reverse-psychologied Belichick into trading up twice with their first two picks, and taking a pass-rushing DE and a LB. This goes against everything they've done during their stretch of success. Let's hope they've strengthened areas of weakness and these picks pay off.


HJS nailed it. Their entire drafting history was on a different playing field. And with a larger window.
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12805
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 911

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby branchinator on Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:11 pm

I'm with HJS. This draft's talent pool hasn't exactly wowed me. I like the Pats' picks but they look like 2nd round talents in a good draft year. Both guys look skilled but neither looks very explosive.
branchinator
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:09 pm
Karma: 200

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby flyingelvii on Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:16 pm

HJS wrote:The Pats old theory of stockpiling later picks worked great in the old world where teams killed their cap by drafting kids high. But, this is a different world now with the much needed rookie structure. You will once again start to see the natural progression of teams rising and falling (which is what the NFL always meant to have happen via the draft). These last 5-10 years saw teams at the top and bottom languish mainly because the draft was killing the worst teams.

Thats said, the Pats ultimately got into the whole trading up swing of things. To get Jones they traded a 3rd to move 6 spots. Strangely, to get Hightower, they traded only a 4th to move up 10.

Is it me or does this draft simply underwhelm with talent? The top 7 players seem excellent. You might make a case for an additional 5 or so as legit first rounders. But, outside of that, I am incredibly underwhelmed. Perhaps, it was because so many kids left school early trying to beat the salary imposition.

Pretty much this. I know it's arrogant and cliched but Belichick is generally ahead of most everyone in terms of personnel. The joke was that he kept drafting TEs, well that worked out well.

Fuck the Devils. That is all.
flyingelvii
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3727
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: 314

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby pick6pedro on Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:32 am

branchinator wrote:I'm with HJS. This draft's talent pool hasn't exactly wowed me. I like the Pats' picks but they look like 2nd round talents in a good draft year. Both guys look skilled but neither looks very explosive.


I was thinking the same thing.
User avatar
pick6pedro
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: A Chalupa Stand
Karma: 2203

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby DavidGordonsFoot on Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:13 am

EagleDave wrote:
Bryn Mawr Eagle wrote:
BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!


Maybe Monday. Hingham Little League has a big weekend ahead, Spaz is preparing by taking a 3 day weekend.


Yeeeeaaaaahhhh... I dunno..... Tuesday is May Day, it's gonna to be kinda tight fitting in all those calls in on Monday. Better wait until Wednesday, less schedule pressure.
wash balls million
User avatar
DavidGordonsFoot
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 7514
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Not tobaccoroad
Karma: 1314

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby claver2010 on Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:31 am

The Jets pick scares me

Image


That thing on his arm? Looks like it hurts :shrug
Frank Spaziani will lead us to the Orange Bowl within the next three years - :pickle 11/11/10

“We stress trophies at BC. We talk a lot about them. That’s your legacy." - York 3/17/12
User avatar
claver2010
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11616
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 1063

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby HustlinOwl on Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:39 am

I guess I'm transitively famous today. My daughter graduated High School with Shea McClellin(graduating class of about 40 people). Boise State was his only offer.
Shut up woman get on my horse.
User avatar
HustlinOwl
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2313
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:58 pm
Location: At Work
Karma: 358

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby branchinator on Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:57 am

That's one nasty, puffy branding on Coples' arm. He'll be the most explosive pass rusher the Jets have had since Vernon Gholston.
branchinator
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:09 pm
Karma: 200

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby DavidGordonsFoot on Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:59 am

Bryn Mawr Eagle wrote:
BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!


Oh my God, no bullshit, from today's Globe:

The choice by the Panthers drew praise from BC coach Frank Spaziani. “A great choice,’’ he said. “He will be perfect for them. And it was the perfect pick for me as well since it came two minutes before my bedtime.’’


http://www.boston.com/sports/football/a ... orts_links
wash balls million
User avatar
DavidGordonsFoot
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 7514
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Not tobaccoroad
Karma: 1314

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby DavidGordonsFoot on Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:00 am

branchinator wrote:That's one nasty, puffy branding on Coples' arm. He'll be the most explosive pass rusher the Jets have had since Vernon Gholston.


How many times do these guys get branded to make it that puffy? No way it scars up like that after one branding.
wash balls million
User avatar
DavidGordonsFoot
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 7514
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Not tobaccoroad
Karma: 1314

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby pick6pedro on Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:04 am

DavidGordonsFoot wrote:
Bryn Mawr Eagle wrote:
BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!


Oh my God, no bullshit, from today's Globe:

The choice by the Panthers drew praise from BC coach Frank Spaziani. “A great choice,’’ he said. “He will be perfect for them. And it was the perfect pick for me as well since it came two minutes before my bedtime.’’


http://www.boston.com/sports/football/a ... orts_links


Nothing like Spaz validating everything we joke about.
User avatar
pick6pedro
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 2:25 pm
Location: A Chalupa Stand
Karma: 2203

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby claver2010 on Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:06 am

DavidGordonsFoot wrote:
Bryn Mawr Eagle wrote:
BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!


Oh my God, no bullshit, from today's Globe:

The choice by the Panthers drew praise from BC coach Frank Spaziani. “A great choice,’’ he said. “He will be perfect for them. And it was the perfect pick for me as well since it came two minutes before my bedtime.’’


http://www.boston.com/sports/football/a ... orts_links


Oh my God.

I had the draft on my comp and really wasn't paying attention as the Rangers were on but wasn't he picked around 9:00? Jesus
Frank Spaziani will lead us to the Orange Bowl within the next three years - :pickle 11/11/10

“We stress trophies at BC. We talk a lot about them. That’s your legacy." - York 3/17/12
User avatar
claver2010
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 11616
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 1063

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby HJS on Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:07 am

pick6pedro wrote:
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:
Bryn Mawr Eagle wrote:
BCSUPERFAN22 wrote:Chances spaz is on the horn with recruits trying to leverage this news
:pickle :spaz2 :pickle :spaz2



Maybe tomorrow - Spaz has been asleep for two hours already!


Oh my God, no bullshit, from today's Globe:

The choice by the Panthers drew praise from BC coach Frank Spaziani. “A great choice,’’ he said. “He will be perfect for them. And it was the perfect pick for me as well since it came two minutes before my bedtime.’’


http://www.boston.com/sports/football/a ... orts_links


Nothing like Spaz validating everything we joke about.

I give Spaz credit for staying up that late. According to folks in attendance at Wall Street Council Dinner, GDF couldn't make it as long.
User avatar
HJS
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 8379
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:08 pm
Karma: 5

Re: Kuechly & the Draft

Postby branchinator on Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:14 am

DavidGordonsFoot wrote:
branchinator wrote:That's one nasty, puffy branding on Coples' arm. He'll be the most explosive pass rusher the Jets have had since Vernon Gholston.


How many times do these guys get branded to make it that puffy? No way it scars up like that after one branding.


Must be a lot. My branding isn't nearly as puffy as Coples'.
branchinator
Cushing Hall
 
Posts: 2072
Joined: Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:09 pm
Karma: 200

PreviousNext

Return to Alumni Stadium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PhillyandBCEagles and 4 guests

Untitled document