









CrosbyLane wrote:You guys are awesome at following directions, I can see why you consider yourself so superior over here. The intelligence is overwhelming.



BCEagle74 wrote:--In 120 years when not an Independent, BC has never won a conference title.
--BC has never won a National Title in the early 40's if you check the correct records, but nonetheless, those teams were the great ones!
--In 20 or so years of the Big East and ACC, BC is empty and was humiliated and pimpslapped by our Big East peers under TOBlunders0-14.
--NO BCS Bowls.
--One major bowl since the great 40's.
Thanks for playing kids.
Its always nice to know there were stupider fucks than me that graduated.

CrosbyLane wrote:BCEagle74 wrote:--In 120 years when not an Independent, BC has never won a conference title.
--BC has never won a National Title in the early 40's if you check the correct records, but nonetheless, those teams were the great ones!
--In 20 or so years of the Big East and ACC, BC is empty and was humiliated and pimpslapped by our Big East peers under TOBlunders0-14.
--NO BCS Bowls.
--One major bowl since the great 40's.
Thanks for playing kids.
Its always nice to know there were stupider fucks than me that graduated.
Hey, but BCs defense sucks, right? How long are you going to keep harping on that? Your opinion is so credible.


NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










CrosbyLane wrote:You'd trade our entire athletic's program for Vtechs? You sure? P.s. that's one school, and a tenuous one. Everyone keep the trades coming, I'd love to hear them.












hansen wrote:CrosbyLane wrote:You guys are awesome at following directions, I can see why you consider yourself so superior over here. The intelligence is overwhelming.
i always got comment #14 on my grade school report card... "fails to follow directions".










CrosbyLane wrote:BCEagle74 wrote:--.
Hey, but BCs defense sucks, right? How long are you going to keep harping on that? Your opinion is so credible.










BCEagle74 wrote:Bowl Subdivision (FBS) National Team Report
Total Offense
Year: 2010 Thru: 12/11/10 Minimum Pct. of Games Played
Rank Name Games Plays Yds Avg TDs Ydspgm Wins Losses Ties
I ADDED THE PASS AND RUSH YARDS. Wow we can stop the run and our big wins were Clemson 6-6 and Syracuse 7-5...
CUSHION!
37 Virginia Tech 13 846 5344 6.32 58 411.08 11 2 0 LOSS 237-106
38 North Carolina St. 12 925 4880 5.28 48 406.67 8 4 0 LOSS 347-75
55 Florida St. 13 831 5030 6.05 51 386.92 9 4 0 LOSS 170-141
63 Notre Dame 12 818 4539 5.55 38 378.25 7 5 0 LOSS 203-112
85 Maryland 12 762 4109 5.39 47 342.42 8 4 0 LOSS 179-43












campion wrote:I don't get to the top of the page very often here, and I just remembered why. I just spent 20 minutes slogging through this and the recruiting thread. We only tack threads if there is no possibility of anything fun taking place within the thread.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










CrosbyLane wrote:claver2010 wrote:That being said football is the money maker and it's going the wrong way. Season tickets, donations, and wins are all in decline and considering this was one of the easiest schedules we have it isn't looking good.
As I've said, GDF painted himself into a corner. It's pretty apparent that Spazoo and Topoo aren't getting us anywhere. As said above, donations & tickets are down big time. He isn't going to make a move
Shocker, you're retarded.
2002: 9-5
2003: 8-5
2004: 9-3
2005: 9-3
2006: 10-3
2007: 11-3
2008: 9-5
2009: 8-5
2010: 7-5
Yea man, what a "decline." Seems pretty steady to me actually, and to most objective people with half a brain. Oh and for donations?
[quote=surprise, you're dumb]Over the past 10 years our annual athletic donations have increased significantly. In 1998, athletic donations totaled approximately $3.6M. Just 10 years later, in 2008, athletic donations totaled $21M, a 10% increase from the previous year's record.


eaglecaddy wrote:CrosbyLane wrote:claver2010 wrote:That being said football is the money maker and it's going the wrong way. Season tickets, donations, and wins are all in decline and considering this was one of the easiest schedules we have it isn't looking good.
As I've said, GDF painted himself into a corner. It's pretty apparent that Spazoo and Topoo aren't getting us anywhere. As said above, donations & tickets are down big time. He isn't going to make a move
Shocker, you're retarded.
2002: 9-5
2003: 8-5
2004: 9-3
2005: 9-3
2006: 10-3
2007: 11-3
2008: 9-5
2009: 8-5
2010: 7-5
Yea man, what a "decline." Seems pretty steady to me actually, and to most objective people with half a brain. Oh and for donations?
[quote=surprise, you're dumb]Over the past 10 years our annual athletic donations have increased significantly. In 1998, athletic donations totaled approximately $3.6M. Just 10 years later, in 2008, athletic donations totaled $21M, a 10% increase from the previous year's record.
So last year was the first year down from the previous - oh man, really far too, down to 17.5million in a horrible economy. Clearly gene has lost his touch and is moving our program backwards. I guess we'll just ignore all logic and fact so we can fit your awesome agenda that makes no sense. Keep on keepin on. BC athletics, totally on the decline.
























TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.












cvilleagle wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.
Sure, we can make a sig wager. It's a pretty conditional wager, though, given that we probably won't end up 6-6 next year. Any ideas?



TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:eaglecaddy wrote:CrosbyLane wrote:claver2010 wrote:That being said football is the money maker and it's going the wrong way. Season tickets, donations, and wins are all in decline and considering this was one of the easiest schedules we have it isn't looking good.
As I've said, GDF painted himself into a corner. It's pretty apparent that Spazoo and Topoo aren't getting us anywhere. As said above, donations & tickets are down big time. He isn't going to make a move
Shocker, you're retarded.
2002: 9-5
2003: 8-5
2004: 9-3
2005: 9-3
2006: 10-3
2007: 11-3
2008: 9-5
2009: 8-5
2010: 7-5
Yea man, what a "decline." Seems pretty steady to me actually, and to most objective people with half a brain. Oh and for donations?
Surprise, you're dumb. Over the past 10 years our annual athletic donations have increased significantly. In 1998, athletic donations totaled approximately $3.6M. Just 10 years later, in 2008, athletic donations totaled $21M, a 10% increase from the previous year's record.
So last year was the first year down from the previous - oh man, really far too, down to 17.5million in a horrible economy. Clearly gene has lost his touch and is moving our program backwards. I guess we'll just ignore all logic and fact so we can fit your awesome agenda that makes no sense. Keep on keepin on. BC athletics, totally on the decline.
Are we all in agreement now that there is almost no difference between going 7-6 and going 11-3?
And next year when we go 6-6, it still won't be a decline, because we will have lost the same number of games.
6-6 will get us abowl game (as proven this year) so a finishing record of 6-6 is unpossible


eaglecaddy wrote:Are we all in agreement now that there is almost no difference between going 7-6 and going 11-3?


BC '00 wrote:cvilleagle wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.
Sure, we can make a sig wager. It's a pretty conditional wager, though, given that we probably won't end up 6-6 next year. Any ideas?
Remember Civil that the ACC has 9 bowl slots, so there would have to be 9 other ACC schools with 6+ wins for us to be left out.












cvilleagle wrote:BC '00 wrote:cvilleagle wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.
Sure, we can make a sig wager. It's a pretty conditional wager, though, given that we probably won't end up 6-6 next year. Any ideas?
Remember Civil that the ACC has 9 bowl slots, so there would have to be 9 other ACC schools with 6+ wins for us to be left out.
Yeah, I guess that's fairly unlikely, but we were one school away this year.
if I were betting money, I would certainly need to have at least 4-1 odds, but it's certainly not impossible.










pick6pedro wrote:cvilleagle wrote:BC '00 wrote:cvilleagle wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.
Sure, we can make a sig wager. It's a pretty conditional wager, though, given that we probably won't end up 6-6 next year. Any ideas?
Remember Civil that the ACC has 9 bowl slots, so there would have to be 9 other ACC schools with 6+ wins for us to be left out.
Yeah, I guess that's fairly unlikely, but we were one school away this year.
if I were betting money, I would certainly need to have at least 4-1 odds, but it's certainly not impossible.
The ACC has 8 bowl affiliations. Have you guys seen BC's top tenleven reasons to go to hoops games?



BC '00 wrote:pick6pedro wrote:cvilleagle wrote:BC '00 wrote:cvilleagle wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.
Sure, we can make a sig wager. It's a pretty conditional wager, though, given that we probably won't end up 6-6 next year. Any ideas?
Remember Civil that the ACC has 9 bowl slots, so there would have to be 9 other ACC schools with 6+ wins for us to be left out.
Yeah, I guess that's fairly unlikely, but we were one school away this year.
if I were betting money, I would certainly need to have at least 4-1 odds, but it's certainly not impossible.
The ACC has 8 bowl affiliations. Have you guys seen BC's top tenleven reasons to go to hoops games?
Did we lose one? (other than the Gator, which was subbed with the Sun).










pick6pedro wrote:BC '00 wrote:pick6pedro wrote:cvilleagle wrote:BC '00 wrote:cvilleagle wrote:TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:cvilleagle wrote:There's no guaranteed bowl game at 6-6. It wouldn't shock me if our reputation for poor fan travel cost us one of the last few bowls.
i'll gladly wager this point with you if you want to make it interesting.
Sure, we can make a sig wager. It's a pretty conditional wager, though, given that we probably won't end up 6-6 next year. Any ideas?
Remember Civil that the ACC has 9 bowl slots, so there would have to be 9 other ACC schools with 6+ wins for us to be left out.
Yeah, I guess that's fairly unlikely, but we were one school away this year.
if I were betting money, I would certainly need to have at least 4-1 odds, but it's certainly not impossible.
The ACC has 8 bowl affiliations. Have you guys seen BC's top tenleven reasons to go to hoops games?
Did we lose one? (other than the Gator, which was subbed with the Sun).
Boise.













TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:that link doesn't appear to work
























cvilleagle wrote:Gene has disgraced the school by being implicated in the Fiesta Bowl scandal.
http://atleagle.blogspot.com/ (p.179-180 - noted on ATL's blog).
Hey, it's an argument.











NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!











Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 5 guests