gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
apbc12 {l Wrote}:BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
I think we can skip the moratorium and go straight to the outright ban.
BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement? Yes, two of the last three seasons sucked and he deserved to be canned. However, for the majority of the guy's tenure players improved, BC won basketball games, and the team made it to the NCAA tournament.
To the main point of your post, BC is going to have to do better than 8-8 in conference to make it to the tournament. The ACC is way down this year and BC is probably going to need a top 4 finish to make it to the NCAA tournament. If they play like they did last night, it's definitely possible.
DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
I think we can skip the moratorium and go straight to the outright ban.
We can at least agre that this team is much more exciting to watch and Paris and Southern would not have improved so much.
apbc12 {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
I think we can skip the moratorium and go straight to the outright ban.
We can at least agre that this team is much more exciting to watch and Paris and Southern would not have improved so much.
Absolutely. The stupid part is the statement, presented as fact, that the team would have been hungover and lost by 15.
ryrob {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
I think we can skip the moratorium and go straight to the outright ban.
We can at least agre that this team is much more exciting to watch and Paris and Southern would not have improved so much.
Absolutely. The stupid part is the statement, presented as fact, that the team would have been hungover and lost by 15.
Seriously. Did anyone actually see how bad this SC team was? We had a 29 point lead at one point.
apbc12 {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
I think we can skip the moratorium and go straight to the outright ban.
We can at least agre that this team is much more exciting to watch and Paris and Southern would not have improved so much.
Absolutely. The stupid part is the statement, presented as fact, that the team would have been hungover and lost by 15.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:DuchesneEast {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:BCMcG {l Wrote}:gamer5252 {l Wrote}:This clearly would never happen under SKinner.
Can we place a moratorium on this ridiculous statement?
I think we can skip the moratorium and go straight to the outright ban.
We can at least agre that this team is much more exciting to watch and Paris and Southern would not have improved so much.
Absolutely. The stupid part is the statement, presented as fact, that the team would have been hungover and lost by 15.
South Carolina was pretty awful last night.
BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:The thing about three point shooting teams is that they can beat anyone or lose to anyone. Vague statement, right? But what I mean is that if the shot falls, we can beat even Duke. If we're inconsistent, we lose to Yale. Dangerous out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 147 guests