b0mberMan wrote:innocentbystander wrote:(given all the INJURIES to the defensive line.).
Legitimate question, who besides Albright have we lost to injury on the DL? I'm blanking.
Connor O'Neil & Brad Newman missed teh Clemson game*
we beat Clemson
b0mberMan wrote:innocentbystander wrote:(given all the INJURIES to the defensive line.).
Legitimate question, who besides Albright have we lost to injury on the DL? I'm blanking.



EagleDave wrote:Injuries are a Spaziani-level excuse for this teams problems. This team was perfectly healthy in Week 4 against Virginia Tech, Week 5 against Notre Dame, and Week 6 against NC State. Combined score: 95-30.
The playcalling and the coaching are the issue. If anything, we've seen the talent begin to show through in the past 2 games in spite of the coaching staff (particularly on offense, where magically the offensive line is pancaking teams again despite the obvious playcalling). Oh and they've been banged up the past 2 weeks, so the injury excuse is irrelevant here.









Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.



innocentbystander wrote:EagleDave wrote:Injuries are a Spaziani-level excuse for this teams problems. This team was perfectly healthy in Week 4 against Virginia Tech, Week 5 against Notre Dame, and Week 6 against NC State. Combined score: 95-30.
The playcalling and the coaching are the issue. If anything, we've seen the talent begin to show through in the past 2 games in spite of the coaching staff (particularly on offense, where magically the offensive line is pancaking teams again despite the obvious playcalling). Oh and they've been banged up the past 2 weeks, so the injury excuse is irrelevant here.
The Clemson win was HUGE! The Wake Forest win? Meh. Not so much. Another win against Duke (that just scored 55 on UVa) and okay, some progress. But as everyone is saying, the coaching has been the main culprit for this lousy season. It starts up top. If they wont let the top guys go, Tranq simply HAS to go.
NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.










b0mberMan wrote:innocentbystander wrote:EagleDave wrote:Injuries are a Spaziani-level excuse for this teams problems. This team was perfectly healthy in Week 4 against Virginia Tech, Week 5 against Notre Dame, and Week 6 against NC State. Combined score: 95-30.
The playcalling and the coaching are the issue. If anything, we've seen the talent begin to show through in the past 2 games in spite of the coaching staff (particularly on offense, where magically the offensive line is pancaking teams again despite the obvious playcalling). Oh and they've been banged up the past 2 weeks, so the injury excuse is irrelevant here.
The Clemson win was HUGE! The Wake Forest win? Meh. Not so much. Another win against Duke (that just scored 55 on UVa) and okay, some progress. But as everyone is saying, the coaching has been the main culprit for this lousy season. It starts up top. If they wont let the top guys go, Tranq simply HAS to go.
i'm still trying to figure out why you think Clemson is a good team.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.



b0mberMan wrote:innocentbystander wrote:EagleDave wrote:Injuries are a Spaziani-level excuse for this teams problems. This team was perfectly healthy in Week 4 against Virginia Tech, Week 5 against Notre Dame, and Week 6 against NC State. Combined score: 95-30.
The playcalling and the coaching are the issue. If anything, we've seen the talent begin to show through in the past 2 games in spite of the coaching staff (particularly on offense, where magically the offensive line is pancaking teams again despite the obvious playcalling). Oh and they've been banged up the past 2 weeks, so the injury excuse is irrelevant here.
The Clemson win was HUGE! The Wake Forest win? Meh. Not so much. Another win against Duke (that just scored 55 on UVa) and okay, some progress. But as everyone is saying, the coaching has been the main culprit for this lousy season. It starts up top. If they wont let the top guys go, Tranq simply HAS to go.
i'm still trying to figure out why you think Clemson is a good team.



b0mberMan wrote:Newman still starts, if that's who you're thinking of.





b0mberMan wrote:innocentbystander wrote:EagleDave wrote:Injuries are a Spaziani-level excuse for this teams problems. This team was perfectly healthy in Week 4 against Virginia Tech, Week 5 against Notre Dame, and Week 6 against NC State. Combined score: 95-30.
The playcalling and the coaching are the issue. If anything, we've seen the talent begin to show through in the past 2 games in spite of the coaching staff (particularly on offense, where magically the offensive line is pancaking teams again despite the obvious playcalling). Oh and they've been banged up the past 2 weeks, so the injury excuse is irrelevant here.
The Clemson win was HUGE! The Wake Forest win? Meh. Not so much. Another win against Duke (that just scored 55 on UVa) and okay, some progress. But as everyone is saying, the coaching has been the main culprit for this lousy season. It starts up top. If they wont let the top guys go, Tranq simply HAS to go.
i'm still trying to figure out why you think Clemson is a good team.







TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:innocentbystander wrote:... They almost beat ...
betardedness set at a new high with the introduction "transitive almosts"






NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.










b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.





innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.










pick6pedro wrote:innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.
YAY! A 6 point, no score in the 2nd half, kill the clock to settle for a FG at the half, close victory over an equally overwhelmed sideline twit!!!!





innocentbystander wrote:pick6pedro wrote:innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.
YAY! A 6 point, no score in the 2nd half, kill the clock to settle for a FG at the half, close victory over an equally overwhelmed sideline twit!!!!
it's... all i've got
haven't beaten them since Ryan. i'll take the little stuff at this point.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










Endless Mike wrote:innocentbystander wrote:pick6pedro wrote:innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.
YAY! A 6 point, no score in the 2nd half, kill the clock to settle for a FG at the half, close victory over an equally overwhelmed sideline twit!!!!
it's... all i've got
haven't beaten them since Ryan. i'll take the little stuff at this point.
Thanks Gene. Thanks Spaz. Look what you've done.












eagle9903 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:innocentbystander wrote:pick6pedro wrote:innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.
YAY! A 6 point, no score in the 2nd half, kill the clock to settle for a FG at the half, close victory over an equally overwhelmed sideline twit!!!!
it's... all i've got
haven't beaten them since Ryan. i'll take the little stuff at this point.
Thanks Gene. Thanks Spaz. Look what you've done.
Made no space post borderline gibberish? I don't think we can blame them for that.
NorthEndEagle wrote:That donkey had character issues.










b0mberMan wrote:eagle9903 wrote:Endless Mike wrote:innocentbystander wrote:pick6pedro wrote:innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.
YAY! A 6 point, no score in the 2nd half, kill the clock to settle for a FG at the half, close victory over an equally overwhelmed sideline twit!!!!
it's... all i've got
haven't beaten them since Ryan. i'll take the little stuff at this point.
Thanks Gene. Thanks Spaz. Look what you've done.
Made no space post borderline gibberish? I don't think we can blame them for that.
Exactly. That's Jags' fault.






















DomingoOrtiz wrote:Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.
Very true


Endless Mike wrote:innocentbystander wrote:pick6pedro wrote:innocentbystander wrote:b0mberMan wrote:My eyes tell me Clemson is a mediocre team with coaching issues. Sounds like BC, actually. We beat our equal. We didn't shock the world.
First time we ever beat Dabo.
YAY! A 6 point, no score in the 2nd half, kill the clock to settle for a FG at the half, close victory over an equally overwhelmed sideline twit!!!!
it's... all i've got
haven't beaten them since Ryan. i'll take the little stuff at this point.
Thanks Gene. Thanks Spaz. Look what you've done.





eagle9903 wrote:One thing, probably the only thing, that the two boards have in common is that no one like captainhardcore over there anymore than they did on EI.


HJS wrote:eagle9903 wrote:One thing, probably the only thing, that the two boards have in common is that no one like captainhardcore over there anymore than they did on EI.
Is that the Valet boy????
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










HJS wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.
Very true
Not true. All CLJ would have done was given OJ's boy more weeks at QB. We would've rolled with Shinskie (with Marsco subbing in after the concussion) through Clemson before taking the redshirt off of Rettig for last week's game against Wake to see if he could stop the then-6-game losing streak.
This is so effing stupid. They didn't start the right players in the right positions all Summer long and through the first half of the season. End of story. No strategy, injury, recruiting deficiency changes that very simple fact.
The team is performing better and better each week as the right QB and right OLinemen playing the correct positions begin to gel. We are right now exactly where we should've been heading into the second game of the season. Discussion about anything else other than squandering talent or potential new coaches just acts camouflage for the real problem.





innocentbystander wrote:HJS wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.
Very true
Not true. All CLJ would have done was given OJ's boy more weeks at QB. We would've rolled with Shinskie (with Marsco subbing in after the concussion) through Clemson before taking the redshirt off of Rettig for last week's game against Wake to see if he could stop the then-6-game losing streak.
This is so effing stupid. They didn't start the right players in the right positions all Summer long and through the first half of the season. End of story. No strategy, injury, recruiting deficiency changes that very simple fact.
The team is performing better and better each week as the right QB and right OLinemen playing the correct positions begin to gel. We are right now exactly where we should've been heading into the second game of the season. Discussion about anything else other than squandering talent or potential new coaches just acts camouflage for the real problem.
Wake Forest was THE WORST TEAM BC has played since Kent State. You have to at least acknowledge that.
This is why I'm saying the Clemson win was big.
NorthEndEagle wrote:IN SPAZ WE TRUST!










Endless Mike wrote:innocentbystander wrote:HJS wrote:DomingoOrtiz wrote:Eagledom wrote:Losing Larmond was fucking huge. The WRs are TERRIBLE...having just one legit threat in there would help the O a lot.
Very true
Not true. All CLJ would have done was given OJ's boy more weeks at QB. We would've rolled with Shinskie (with Marsco subbing in after the concussion) through Clemson before taking the redshirt off of Rettig for last week's game against Wake to see if he could stop the then-6-game losing streak.
This is so effing stupid. They didn't start the right players in the right positions all Summer long and through the first half of the season. End of story. No strategy, injury, recruiting deficiency changes that very simple fact.
The team is performing better and better each week as the right QB and right OLinemen playing the correct positions begin to gel. We are right now exactly where we should've been heading into the second game of the season. Discussion about anything else other than squandering talent or potential new coaches just acts camouflage for the real problem.
Wake Forest was THE WORST TEAM BC has played since Kent State. You have to at least acknowledge that.
This is why I'm saying the Clemson win was big.
Just look what they've done to you. It's shameful.





HJS wrote:eagle9903 wrote:One thing, probably the only thing, that the two boards have in common is that no one like captainhardcore over there anymore than they did on EI.
Is that the Valet boy????












eagle9903 wrote:HJS wrote:eagle9903 wrote:One thing, probably the only thing, that the two boards have in common is that no one like captainhardcore over there anymore than they did on EI.
Is that the Valet boy????
either him or someone with the same name.










Users browsing this forum: bcbcbcbcbc4444, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 3 guests