Page 1 of 1

Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 8:49 pm
by claver2010
Interesting opening opponent to start the season. Only returning 1 double digit goal scorer (though they only had 3) & lost their all HE goalie. Back to back HE tourney champs but selected to finish 7.

Both young teams but they have 11 FR, 9 SO. Good test, Tsongas can be a tough place to play when its full (even if their student section sits, which :81 )

Games on NESN which is great for those flying to RCC :flagus

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2014 9:08 am
by claver2010
guess belongs here as there is a game tomorrow, heights had their hockey preview today.

good Q&A with York http://bcheights.com/sports/2014/jerry- ... ockey-q-a/

talked about how the offense will grow as the year goes on, the "S" line, matheson coming back, & sonny milano

also revealed Silk's injury which is a concussion, he's questionable for this weekend

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 6:26 pm
by eepstein0
How is Mattheson still so lost on defense? That goal he just caused was totally unnecessary

Edit: Second goal was even worse

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 7:33 pm
by shockdoct
Is there a reason why this broadcast seems like a UML infomercial?

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:12 pm
by eepstein0
The talent seems good to me.

The defensive miscues are brutal. This will eventually be a very good team, but a major work in progress now

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:32 pm
by twballgame9
They might be good in three months but they are a horrible team right now. All talent no team.

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:59 pm
by BostonCollege1
Well, that was a disaster.

Blind passes, no communication, stupid penalties, outhustled. Look forward to seeing who steps up their game over the season.

Sit was sitting in our section 3rd period - I assume he was hurt, but not sure what happened.

:angrychicken

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:19 pm
by Dick Rosenthal
York will fix tonight's abortion. There is a lot of talent out there, but it is mostly young and stupid. The one thing that is troubling is that Mikey Turnovers still looks absolutely clueless out there at times. At this point, something should have clicked with him. I wonder if this simply is who he is as a player.

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:58 am
by wolverineneshl
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:How is Mattheson still so lost on defense? That goal he just caused was totally unnecessary

Edit: Second goal was even worse


From watching him since freshman year, he has that same look and cockiness with the puck and nonchalant attitude that leads to miscues, errors and bad decisions with and without the puck. He is not as good as he thinks and needs to play with a sense of urgency and execute better. He can be a very good player at times and then other times WTF. He can use some Tommy Cross's steadiness and leadership qualities. He is just not there and does not get it. This is his third year and he has not matured as a player that is expected of him. I hope I'm wrong and he turns into that Tommy Cross type player. He is just making too many mental mistakes and not playing smart hockey. OK on to the football team today.

Don't know why but it seems there were Lowell players sitting in our BC section in 114. Or maybe they're UML recruits. At first I thought they were BC players not playing tonight but then I realized they were not as they were cheering on each UML goal. All of them dressed as student athletes, suit and tie.

It just seem weird putting them in the BC fan section. I left with about a minute left realizing the final outcome before UML scored their 5th goal. With a 3-1 lead I already thought game was lost the way they were playing all night except maybe the first 4 minutes of the game and first 5 minutes of the 3rd period. I hauled ass out and made it to my pickup game in Dedham.

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 6:38 am
by BostonCollege1
wolverineneshl {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:How is Mattheson still so lost on defense? That goal he just caused was totally unnecessary

Edit: Second goal was even worse


From watching him since freshman year, he has that same look and cockiness with the puck and nonchalant attitude that leads to miscues, errors and bad decisions with and without the puck. He is not as good as he thinks and needs to play with a sense of urgency and execute better. He can be a very good player at times and then other times WTF. He can use some Tommy Cross's steadiness and leadership qualities. He is just not there and does not get it. This is his third year and he has not matured as a player that is expected of him. I hope I'm wrong and he turns into that Tommy Cross type player. He is just making too many mental mistakes and not playing smart hockey. OK on to the football team today.

Don't know why but it seems there were Lowell players sitting in our BC section in 114. Or maybe they're UML recruits. At first I thought they were BC players not playing tonight but then I realized they were not as they were cheering on each UML goal. All of them dressed as student athletes, suit and tie.

It just seem weird putting them in the BC fan section. I left with about a minute left realizing the final outcome before UML scored their 5th goal. With a 3-1 lead I already thought game was lost the way they were playing all night except maybe the first 4 minutes of the game and first 5 minutes of the 3rd period. I hauled ass out and made it to my pickup game in Dedham.


He is one of my least favorite players. He's either going to learn to play hard all the time or he'll get a wakeup call in some shitty minor league town when someone kicks his nonchalant ass and he then gets benched by his coach for giving up lazy goals.

Lowell crowd was loud. It was announced that they had a record student attendance at something like 2,300. BC has to draw more students than that.

I could tell those were Lowell players in the stands by the beards and slightly long hair; yes, funny location for them to sit, but opposing players often sit in section V in Conte if it's available.

Is Tubasteak a former band geek? Might have been him behind me.

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:58 am
by eepstein0
BostonCollege1 {l Wrote}:
wolverineneshl {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:How is Mattheson still so lost on defense? That goal he just caused was totally unnecessary

Edit: Second goal was even worse


From watching him since freshman year, he has that same look and cockiness with the puck and nonchalant attitude that leads to miscues, errors and bad decisions with and without the puck. He is not as good as he thinks and needs to play with a sense of urgency and execute better. He can be a very good player at times and then other times WTF. He can use some Tommy Cross's steadiness and leadership qualities. He is just not there and does not get it. This is his third year and he has not matured as a player that is expected of him. I hope I'm wrong and he turns into that Tommy Cross type player. He is just making too many mental mistakes and not playing smart hockey. OK on to the football team today.

Don't know why but it seems there were Lowell players sitting in our BC section in 114. Or maybe they're UML recruits. At first I thought they were BC players not playing tonight but then I realized they were not as they were cheering on each UML goal. All of them dressed as student athletes, suit and tie.

It just seem weird putting them in the BC fan section. I left with about a minute left realizing the final outcome before UML scored their 5th goal. With a 3-1 lead I already thought game was lost the way they were playing all night except maybe the first 4 minutes of the game and first 5 minutes of the 3rd period. I hauled ass out and made it to my pickup game in Dedham.


He is one of my least favorite players. He's either going to learn to play hard all the time or he'll get a wakeup call in some shitty minor league town when someone kicks his nonchalant ass and he then gets benched by his coach for giving up lazy goals.

Lowell crowd was loud. It was announced that they had a record student attendance at something like 2,300. BC has to draw more students than that.

I could tell those were Lowell players in the stands by the beards and slightly long hair; yes, funny location for them to sit, but opposing players often sit in section V in Conte if it's available.

Is Tubasteak a former band geek? Might have been him behind me.


I'm surprised it took everyone so long again to come over to my point of view on him. i love the rest of our D, but he should be playing RW

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 9:22 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
BostonCollege1 {l Wrote}:Is Tubasteak a former band geek? Might have been him behind me.

yes

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 11:21 am
by commavegarage
how did tubasteak become tubasteak again?

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:24 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
commavegarage {l Wrote}:how did tubasteak become tubasteak again?

because he likes tube steaks smothered in underwear and he plays the tuba. we combined his two loves...

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 9:40 am
by twballgame9
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
BostonCollege1 {l Wrote}:
wolverineneshl {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:How is Mattheson still so lost on defense? That goal he just caused was totally unnecessary

Edit: Second goal was even worse


From watching him since freshman year, he has that same look and cockiness with the puck and nonchalant attitude that leads to miscues, errors and bad decisions with and without the puck. He is not as good as he thinks and needs to play with a sense of urgency and execute better. He can be a very good player at times and then other times WTF. He can use some Tommy Cross's steadiness and leadership qualities. He is just not there and does not get it. This is his third year and he has not matured as a player that is expected of him. I hope I'm wrong and he turns into that Tommy Cross type player. He is just making too many mental mistakes and not playing smart hockey. OK on to the football team today.

Don't know why but it seems there were Lowell players sitting in our BC section in 114. Or maybe they're UML recruits. At first I thought they were BC players not playing tonight but then I realized they were not as they were cheering on each UML goal. All of them dressed as student athletes, suit and tie.

It just seem weird putting them in the BC fan section. I left with about a minute left realizing the final outcome before UML scored their 5th goal. With a 3-1 lead I already thought game was lost the way they were playing all night except maybe the first 4 minutes of the game and first 5 minutes of the 3rd period. I hauled ass out and made it to my pickup game in Dedham.


He is one of my least favorite players. He's either going to learn to play hard all the time or he'll get a wakeup call in some shitty minor league town when someone kicks his nonchalant ass and he then gets benched by his coach for giving up lazy goals.

Lowell crowd was loud. It was announced that they had a record student attendance at something like 2,300. BC has to draw more students than that.

I could tell those were Lowell players in the stands by the beards and slightly long hair; yes, funny location for them to sit, but opposing players often sit in section V in Conte if it's available.

Is Tubasteak a former band geek? Might have been him behind me.


I'm surprised it took everyone so long again to come over to my point of view on him. i love the rest of our D, but he should be playing RW


Not sure it really took very long for anyone to come to that conclusion, but you are awesome.

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 9:55 am
by claver2010
Forgive me for going all nospace but looking at the boxscore, how the hell does the bottom 6 generate 1 shot when York constantly runs four lines?
Apparently Sanford has upper body injury.
Also weird that Barone dressed in front of Billet

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 11:14 pm
by BostonCollege1
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Forgive me for going all nospace but looking at the boxscore, how the hell does the bottom 6 generate 1 shot when York constantly runs four lines?
Apparently Sanford has upper body injury.
Also weird that Barone dressed in front of Billet


Barone got the second period in the exhibtion, with Billet playing the 3rd. Barone looked better,too.

Re: Opener vs UML

PostPosted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 4:50 pm
by Salzano14
BostonCollege1 {l Wrote}:Is Tubasteak a former band geek? Might have been him behind me.
Nah I wasn't there unfortunately