Page 1 of 1

No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:38 pm
by QuailMan
Whats the deal with Mass hockey? I think the closet to making the team was the goalie Schenider

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:49 pm
by flyingelvii
Keith Yandle. I don't really have an answer to the other question. Perhaps increased athletic specialization but that's a half-assed and non-thought out answer. There's just not a lot of high-end talent there outside a couple of guys. http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/us-state/active-nhl-players-born-in-massachusetts-career-stats.html

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:14 pm
by Dick Rosenthal
Part of the reason is that they took the 9th or 10th best player on the Rangers (Stepan) instead of the 2nd best player (Kreider). The fact that Kreider skates faster than Stepan, covers exponentially more ice and has played with a nasty edge while staying on the right side of that edge (with the exception of his 17 pms and ejection the other night) makes it that much more unfathomable. Unfortunately, USA Hockey decided who was going to be considered a year ago and didn't care much about what actually happened on the ice this year.

Anyway, because this Olympics is not being played in North America, I expect Team USA to fail spectacularly like they did in Turin and Nagano.

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:47 am
by QuailMan
I expected Minnesota, Michigan and New York to be represented with a lot of players but Connecticut has representation and not Mass...

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 2:01 pm
by pick6pedro
It's probably because Toughchester has lost its edge.

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 2:24 pm
by claver2010
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Part of the reason is that they took the 9th or 10th best player on the Rangers (Stepan) instead of the 2nd best player (Kreider). The fact that Kreider skates faster than Stepan, covers exponentially more ice and has played with a nasty edge while staying on the right side of that edge (with the exception of his 17 pms and ejection the other night) makes it that much more unfathomable. Unfortunately, USA Hockey decided who was going to be considered a year ago and didn't care much about what actually happened on the ice this year.

Anyway, because this Olympics is not being played in North America, I expect Team USA to fail spectacularly like they did in Turin and Nagano.


Don't think Kreider crossed the line, just a big guy hitting someone in an awkward spot.

I agree, I don't see the US doing well this year either.

Edited type faster than i think

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:16 pm
by QuailMan
CM playing Delbarton of New Jersey in Yankee stadium

http://espn.go.com/blog/boston/high-sch ... ee-stadium

Cm better win

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 11:55 am
by flyingelvii
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Part of the reason is that they took the 9th or 10th best player on the Rangers (Stepan) instead of the 2nd best player (Kreider). The fact that Kreider skates faster than Stepan, covers exponentially more ice and has played with a nasty edge while staying on the right side of that edge (with the exception of his 17 pms and ejection the other night) makes it that much more unfathomable. Unfortunately, USA Hockey decided who was going to be considered a year ago and didn't care much about what actually happened on the ice this year.

Anyway, because this Olympics is not being played in North America, I expect Team USA to fail spectacularly like they did in Turin and Nagano.

Well the decision wasn't Kreider vs. Stepan. It was more likely Stepan vs. Saad vs. Dubinsky and maybe Okposo, though he's a different player than the other ones. Kreider will have his chance come 2018 but he is way too green at this point.

That said, I expect failure as well. Not enough scoring, not enough depth on D.

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:17 pm
by twballgame9
I think they will score but the D sucks other than the goalies.

Re: No Mass Kids on USA Olympic Team

PostPosted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:33 pm
by Dick Rosenthal
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Part of the reason is that they took the 9th or 10th best player on the Rangers (Stepan) instead of the 2nd best player (Kreider). The fact that Kreider skates faster than Stepan, covers exponentially more ice and has played with a nasty edge while staying on the right side of that edge (with the exception of his 17 pms and ejection the other night) makes it that much more unfathomable. Unfortunately, USA Hockey decided who was going to be considered a year ago and didn't care much about what actually happened on the ice this year.

Anyway, because this Olympics is not being played in North America, I expect Team USA to fail spectacularly like they did in Turin and Nagano.

Well the decision wasn't Kreider vs. Stepan. It was more likely Stepan vs. Saad vs. Dubinsky and maybe Okposo, though he's a different player than the other ones. Kreider will have his chance come 2018 but he is way too green at this point.

That said, I expect failure as well. Not enough scoring, not enough depth on D.



I don't disagree that Kreider's green, but check out the scouting report on Stepan and the "strengths" he allegedly brings to the table and there is not a single thing he does better than Kreider. Not one. Up until six weeks ago you might have been able to say that he was more defensibly responsible than Krieder, but that has flown by the wayside. Hell, the last minute of last night's surprising road win over the Blackhawks nearly turned into a tragedy for the Rangers because Stepan was running around up top futilely chasing the puck (but not making any attempt to block a shot) while the Rangers were getting crushed down low only getting bailed out of giving up the tying goal by Brian Boyle's face (blocking a deflection) and ability to push Toewes out of position Callahan's quick poke check to break up the last second attempt to feed a wide open Kane.

I would have taken Dubinsky over Saad, but would not have been upset one way or the other.