Page 82 of 100

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:45 pm
by eagle9903
claver2010 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:are there hockey nerds in boston like there are here? the best flyers blog (for information purposes) is filled with advanced stats geeks and cba quoting weirdos.


Do they have pictures of shirtless boys?

THIS IS IMPORTANT! for TGOSB and TRE rhymes ghey


most likely. this state has had some problems with that lately.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:45 pm
by eagle9903
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:I can't speak for stat geeks but I am a lot more well versed in the various intricacies of the CBA than I probably should be.



Some of the stat geek/cba afficianados take the fun out of being a fan. Also, they are generally wrong a lot.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:57 pm
by flyingelvii
I agree with the stat geek stuff just because hockey is such a fluid game you can't capture everything neatly in a few numbers. Which is unlike baseball in which every event of every play is pretty much documented. In terms of the CBA stuff, I've just kinda picked it up through osmosis and wanting to gain a better understanding of what is happening and why things are happening, such as the 35+ contracts, buyouts, LTIR and basically other cap related issues. I believe that process all started with either the Thomas 35+ contract or the Glen Murray buyout.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:03 pm
by bignick33
To answer your question eagle9903, there are both hockey nerds and hockey brutish types in Boston, just as there are in Philly. There are probably a lot more of both here than there are there, because Bruins territory is a lot more geographically expansive than Flyers territory (it goes north all the way to Canada and the Martime provinces and stuff). What we also have a lot of--as I'm sure the Canadian teams do as well--are the hockey-coach types who are probably somewhere in between the aforementioned categories. These are the types who sit quietly in their seats during play then analyze play with their buddies often in great detail during breaks in play. Some are tremendously knowledgeable, and others think the fact that they coached their kid's mite team in and of itself gives them expertise. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced here because people from Boston and surroundings self-indulgently think they make good hockey coaches as a rule on the basis that there have been a lot of good hockey coaches from Boston (any of the hockey coach types would cite guys like Laviolette, Torts, Joe Sacco, Brian Burke, Scott Gordon, Jack Capuano, Jerry, Parker, Bill Hanson, Ken Martin, and probably some others as evidence of this fact).

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:04 am
by claver2010
From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:39 pm
by eagle9903
claver2010 {l Wrote}:From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."


this is probably an attempt to make it not seem like it was a pure money grab.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:40 pm
by bignick33
claver2010 {l Wrote}:From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."


Isn't that sort of what Cliff Lee said?

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:47 pm
by eagle9903
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."


Isn't that sort of what Cliff Lee said?


some yankee's fan spit on cliff lee's wife or something

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:49 pm
by bignick33
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."


Isn't that sort of what Cliff Lee said?


some yankee's fan spit on cliff lee's wife or something


Probably beside the point, but maybe she deserved it?

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:58 pm
by flyingelvii
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."


this is probably an attempt to make it not seem like it was a pure money grab.

Wasn't he offered more than what Minnesota gave him though? I know Parise was by Philly but wasn't 100% positive with regards to Suter.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:04 pm
by eagle9903
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:From the WTF dept.

Suter's agent on his hesitation signing w NY...

“(Weber) is a small-town guy and (New York) is a huge city,” Weber’s agent, Jarrett Bousquet said. “With New York, it was nothing personal."


this is probably an attempt to make it not seem like it was a pure money grab.

Wasn't he offered more than what Minnesota gave him though? I know Parise was by Philly but wasn't 100% positive with regards to Suter.


Yes. But Claver's post is confusing. Bousequet is talking about Weber, not Suter, although he is both of their agents. I take this as Weber saying through his agent, that while he doesn't want to be in nashville (mainly because they let sutter walk) he is not just going for the biggest paycheck, he is also going to a place he doesn't hate as much as new york. I think it is deflecting. Maybe I am misreading it.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:07 pm
by claver2010

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:44 pm
by flyingelvii
No worries, I also cannot read good. And I can't really blame a guy for passing up a city he doesn't like when signing a 14 year contract.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:18 pm
by bignick33
Rick nash to NYR?

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:33 pm
by claver2010
Sounds like it's close, that fucking canuck better have not given up McDonaugh or Kreider.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:37 pm
by bignick33
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Sounds like it's close, that fucking canuck better have not given up McDonaugh or Kreider.


Stepan is not involved according to Dreger. I'd say it's more likely that Kreider is going than McD.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:42 pm
by eagle9903
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Sounds like it's close, that fucking canuck better have not given up McDonaugh or Kreider.


Stepan is not involved according to Dreger. I'd say it's more likely that Kreider is going than McD.


Dreger: Dubinsky, Erixson and 1st believed to be 3 of 4 pieces included in Nash trade.”

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:43 pm
by eagle9903
who else hegelin?

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:46 pm
by claver2010
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:who else hegelin?


Rumor is him or Anisomov

Edit: Looks like Anisomov

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:47 pm
by bignick33
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Sounds like it's close, that fucking canuck better have not given up McDonaugh or Kreider.


Stepan is not involved according to Dreger. I'd say it's more likely that Kreider is going than McD.


Dreger: Dubinsky, Erixson and 1st believed to be 3 of 4 pieces included in Nash trade.”


eagle9903 {l Wrote}:who else hegelin?


claver2010 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:who else hegelin?


Rumor is him or Anisomov

Edit: Looks like Anisomov


If this is the deal, it's not a whole lot that they're giving up (Nash's contract nonwithstanding). Erixon is a decent prospect, but as far as I know, he isn't a truly elite prospect. The first rounder will probably not yield a top 20 pick, either.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:54 pm
by claver2010
So looks like:

Anisomov, Dubinsky, Erixon, & a 1st for Nash.

Not terrible at all considering the names that Columbus has been throwing out there for months (personnel-wise, I'll leave the CBA/cap musings to FLYINGELVISFAXXOT

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:00 pm
by eagle9903
claver2010 {l Wrote}:So looks like:

Anisomov, Dubinsky, Erixon, & a 1st for Nash.

Not terrible at all considering the names that Columbus has been throwing out there for months (personnel-wise, I'll leave the CBA/cap musings to FLYINGELVISFAXXOT


yeah, that's really, really light. Wasn't Howson demanding Gaborik and Kreider at some point?

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:03 pm
by Endless Mike
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:Flyers sign Shea Weber to a 14 year 100+ million dollar offer sheet. Will Preds match?



Hockey contracts are funny. Do the Islanders still have Slick DiPietro under contract through 2068? :quadlaser

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:05 pm
by flyingelvii
Scott Howson deserves to be taken out behind the shed and shot. I hope Columbus enjoys another 5 years of mediocrity as they hope to be saved by a middling goalie that couldn't stick in Philly and an 18 year old smallish offensive defenseman.

Cap wise I imagine it nets out pretty even, though I have pretty much been of the thought since the beginning that I wouldn't want to touch Nash's contract at all. Now if he turns out to be a 50-goal guy now that he has a legitimate pass-first center carrying him along, then it could be worth it, but, man, that is an awful lot to pay for any winger, especially one that isn't an elite goal-scoring winger yet.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:10 pm
by claver2010
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:So looks like:

Anisomov, Dubinsky, Erixon, & a 1st for Nash.

Not terrible at all considering the names that Columbus has been throwing out there for months (personnel-wise, I'll leave the CBA/cap musings to FLYINGELVISFAXXOT


yeah, that's really, really light. Wasn't Howson demanding Gaborik and Kreider at some point?


I remember it as:

1 of Kreider/McD
1 of Stepan/Dubinsky
1st rounder
Prospect

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:11 pm
by flyingelvii
He was asking the B's for Hamilton, Seguin and a first. And settled for this pile of crap.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:49 pm
by eagle9903
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Scott Howson deserves to be taken out behind the shed and shot. I hope Columbus enjoys another 5 years of mediocrity as they hope to be saved by a middling goalie that couldn't stick in Philly and an 18 year old smallish offensive defenseman.

Cap wise I imagine it nets out pretty even, though I have pretty much been of the thought since the beginning that I wouldn't want to touch Nash's contract at all. Now if he turns out to be a 50-goal guy now that he has a legitimate pass-first center carrying him along, then it could be worth it, but, man, that is an awful lot to pay for any winger, especially one that isn't an elite goal-scoring winger yet.


I prefer to think of Howson trading Couturier('s draft pick) and Voracek to the Flyers for 3 months of Jeff Carter who he would then trade for the tremendously awful Jack Johnson.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:57 pm
by flyingelvii
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Scott Howson deserves to be taken out behind the shed and shot. I hope Columbus enjoys another 5 years of mediocrity as they hope to be saved by a middling goalie that couldn't stick in Philly and an 18 year old smallish offensive defenseman.

Cap wise I imagine it nets out pretty even, though I have pretty much been of the thought since the beginning that I wouldn't want to touch Nash's contract at all. Now if he turns out to be a 50-goal guy now that he has a legitimate pass-first center carrying him along, then it could be worth it, but, man, that is an awful lot to pay for any winger, especially one that isn't an elite goal-scoring winger yet.


I prefer to think of Howson trading Couturier('s draft pick) and Voracek to the Flyers for 3 months of Jeff Carter who he would then trade for the tremendously awful Jack Johnson.

I like to think of him as the guy that actually gave up something of value for Sergei Bobrovsky and is relatively content to go into a season where his job is on the line with him and Mason as his goalies.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:52 pm
by eagle9903
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
flyingelvii {l Wrote}:Scott Howson deserves to be taken out behind the shed and shot. I hope Columbus enjoys another 5 years of mediocrity as they hope to be saved by a middling goalie that couldn't stick in Philly and an 18 year old smallish offensive defenseman.

Cap wise I imagine it nets out pretty even, though I have pretty much been of the thought since the beginning that I wouldn't want to touch Nash's contract at all. Now if he turns out to be a 50-goal guy now that he has a legitimate pass-first center carrying him along, then it could be worth it, but, man, that is an awful lot to pay for any winger, especially one that isn't an elite goal-scoring winger yet.


I prefer to think of Howson trading Couturier('s draft pick) and Voracek to the Flyers for 3 months of Jeff Carter who he would then trade for the tremendously awful Jack Johnson.

I like to think of him as the guy that actually gave up something of value for Sergei Bobrovsky and is relatively content to go into a season where his job is on the line with him and Mason as his goalies.


Bob could be (but probably won't be) good though and it was only a 2 and two 4s or something.

Re: Bruins Weirdos

PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:34 am
by eagle9903
it is never going to be 37 hours from now.