twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I know they are erratic, but ny the end of the year I would put FSU in tier 1a with UNC. They have three weak teams in a row, and then Miami and NCSU left. They should get to at least 11 wins. UNC still has 2 games with Duke, and a head to head with FSU. I think they will also lose to one of MD at home or CLEM on the road. I figure them for 3 more losses, which would put them at 12 wins.
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I know they are erratic, but ny the end of the year I would put FSU in tier 1a with UNC. They have three weak teams in a row, and then Miami and NCSU left. They should get to at least 11 wins. UNC still has 2 games with Duke, and a head to head with FSU. I think they will also lose to one of MD at home or CLEM on the road. I figure them for 3 more losses, which would put them at 12 wins.
I was tempted to put FSU in Tier 1, but they've been blown out twice in the last week. While the road ahead for them is paved with lesser teams, UNC has upped their game a level after a bumpy start.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I know they are erratic, but ny the end of the year I would put FSU in tier 1a with UNC. They have three weak teams in a row, and then Miami and NCSU left. They should get to at least 11 wins. UNC still has 2 games with Duke, and a head to head with FSU. I think they will also lose to one of MD at home or CLEM on the road. I figure them for 3 more losses, which would put them at 12 wins.
I was tempted to put FSU in Tier 1, but they've been blown out twice in the last week. While the road ahead for them is paved with lesser teams, UNC has upped their game a level after a bumpy start.
How much of your opinion of UNC is based on the BC game? Because from what I have seen, I think UNC's start is consistant with what they are - mediocre overall, and good in the ACC. They lost to ILL, VANDY, MINN and TEX and have basically beaten no one other than KY and FSU. Although the last 3 wins over BC, NCSU and FSU were impressive, in the past month they have struggled with VT, UVA and MIA and lost to GT.
So either the past 3 games are a trend, or they just caught a few teams on a bad streak (BC/FSU). For now, and given what we have seen from BC lately, I am leaning toward the latter until proven otherwise.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I know they are erratic, but ny the end of the year I would put FSU in tier 1a with UNC. They have three weak teams in a row, and then Miami and NCSU left. They should get to at least 11 wins. UNC still has 2 games with Duke, and a head to head with FSU. I think they will also lose to one of MD at home or CLEM on the road. I figure them for 3 more losses, which would put them at 12 wins.
I was tempted to put FSU in Tier 1, but they've been blown out twice in the last week. While the road ahead for them is paved with lesser teams, UNC has upped their game a level after a bumpy start.
How much of your opinion of UNC is based on the BC game? Because from what I have seen, I think UNC's start is consistant with what they are - mediocre overall, and good in the ACC. They lost to ILL, VANDY, MINN and TEX and have basically beaten no one other than KY and FSU. Although the last 3 wins over BC, NCSU and FSU were impressive, in the past month they have struggled with VT, UVA and MIA and lost to GT.
So either the past 3 games are a trend, or they just caught a few teams on a bad streak (BC/FSU). For now, and given what we have seen from BC lately, I am leaning toward the latter until proven otherwise.
With a win against Clemson, BC would own the H2H with 3/4 Tier 2 teams (for now) and at worst would finish .500 against Tier 2 for the regular season.
bignick33 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I know they are erratic, but ny the end of the year I would put FSU in tier 1a with UNC. They have three weak teams in a row, and then Miami and NCSU left. They should get to at least 11 wins. UNC still has 2 games with Duke, and a head to head with FSU. I think they will also lose to one of MD at home or CLEM on the road. I figure them for 3 more losses, which would put them at 12 wins.
I was tempted to put FSU in Tier 1, but they've been blown out twice in the last week. While the road ahead for them is paved with lesser teams, UNC has upped their game a level after a bumpy start.
How much of your opinion of UNC is based on the BC game? Because from what I have seen, I think UNC's start is consistant with what they are - mediocre overall, and good in the ACC. They lost to ILL, VANDY, MINN and TEX and have basically beaten no one other than KY and FSU. Although the last 3 wins over BC, NCSU and FSU were impressive, in the past month they have struggled with VT, UVA and MIA and lost to GT.
So either the past 3 games are a trend, or they just caught a few teams on a bad streak (BC/FSU). For now, and given what we have seen from BC lately, I am leaning toward the latter until proven otherwise.
Since the Kentucky win, UNC has won 13 of 15, losing only to Texas by 2 and Georgia Tech by 20 (WTF). Kentucky is definitely their signature win, but consistently beating good teams like FSU, BC, and Clemson easily as of late combined with playing an exceptional Texas team tight (albeit in North Carolina) leads me to believe that UNC is now a top-15 caliber team. I wouldn't have said that earlier in the year.
Of course, you don't think Roy is a very good coach, so their improving throughout the season it totally impossible.
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I know they are erratic, but ny the end of the year I would put FSU in tier 1a with UNC. They have three weak teams in a row, and then Miami and NCSU left. They should get to at least 11 wins. UNC still has 2 games with Duke, and a head to head with FSU. I think they will also lose to one of MD at home or CLEM on the road. I figure them for 3 more losses, which would put them at 12 wins.
I was tempted to put FSU in Tier 1, but they've been blown out twice in the last week. While the road ahead for them is paved with lesser teams, UNC has upped their game a level after a bumpy start.
How much of your opinion of UNC is based on the BC game? Because from what I have seen, I think UNC's start is consistant with what they are - mediocre overall, and good in the ACC. They lost to ILL, VANDY, MINN and TEX and have basically beaten no one other than KY and FSU. Although the last 3 wins over BC, NCSU and FSU were impressive, in the past month they have struggled with VT, UVA and MIA and lost to GT.
So either the past 3 games are a trend, or they just caught a few teams on a bad streak (BC/FSU). For now, and given what we have seen from BC lately, I am leaning toward the latter until proven otherwise.
Not a ton, but it certainly plays a role. It's that they have the talent to have been doing for the whole season what they are doing now. The loss to a very good Texas team by 2 was a game that really got them going in the right direction. Only 2 losses in their last 15 games (the solid game against UT and the strange loss to GT by 20). And all their losses, other than GT, are to definite above average teams. They are trending upward and are playing well coming into what will be a tough stretch. The Duke game should tell us a lot. On the other hand, FSU is trending downward, IMO.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
Reggie needs to go to the basket...that rest of the game will open up once he starts attacking. Clemson is all over the place and so are we so I have not the slightest idea what will go down on Tuesday Night. A win gets us to 6-4 and gives us some cushion. I can't remember the last time we won @ Clemson...
2008Eagle {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
Reggie needs to go to the basket...that rest of the game will open up once he starts attacking. Clemson is all over the place and so are we so I have not the slightest idea what will go down on Tuesday Night. A win gets us to 6-4 and gives us some cushion. I can't remember the last time we won @ Clemson...
Actually BC never has won at Clemson. 0-4 all time.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
Reggie needs to go to the basket...that rest of the game will open up once he starts attacking. Clemson is all over the place and so are we so I have not the slightest idea what will go down on Tuesday Night. A win gets us to 6-4 and gives us some cushion. I can't remember the last time we won @ Clemson...
claver2010 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
Reggie needs to go to the basket...that rest of the game will open up once he starts attacking. Clemson is all over the place and so are we so I have not the slightest idea what will go down on Tuesday Night. A win gets us to 6-4 and gives us some cushion. I can't remember the last time we won @ Clemson...
10 is the magic number to be taken off the bubble -meaning we need 5 from these:
@Clemson
Maryland
@UNC
Miami
@UVA
@VT
Wake
bignick33 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
Reggie needs to go to the basket...that rest of the game will open up once he starts attacking. Clemson is all over the place and so are we so I have not the slightest idea what will go down on Tuesday Night. A win gets us to 6-4 and gives us some cushion. I can't remember the last time we won @ Clemson...
10 is the magic number to be taken off the bubble -meaning we need 5 from these:
@Clemson
Maryland
@UNC
Miami
@UVA
@VT
Wake
True...but it's worth mentioning that 4+1 in ACC Tourney would get us in as well. Unfortunately, I don't think there's much chance we'll get more than four of the games you mention.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Would be nice to get some momentum going.
Can someone put an amber alert out for Reggie? In the last 4 games:
9 ppg, 13-47 (27.7%) FG, 2-15 (13.3%) 3FG, 8-12 (even you non- can figure that one out) FT
Reggie needs to go to the basket...that rest of the game will open up once he starts attacking. Clemson is all over the place and so are we so I have not the slightest idea what will go down on Tuesday Night. A win gets us to 6-4 and gives us some cushion. I can't remember the last time we won @ Clemson...
10 is the magic number to be taken off the bubble -meaning we need 5 from these:
@Clemson
Maryland
@UNC
Miami
@UVA
@VT
Wake
True...but it's worth mentioning that 4+1 in ACC Tourney would get us in as well. Unfortunately, I don't think there's much chance we'll get more than four of the games you mention.
Wins
Miami
@UVA
Wake
Losses
@ VT
@ UNC
50/50 games
@ Clemson
MD
Split the 50/50 games and you've got your 9 wins which will be fine. Win both games this week and we're probably getting to double digit wins in the ACC. I see no way we're beating VT or UNC on the road though VT maybe slightly more likely. That's another building we haven't had a ton of success in lately.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Clemson isn't very good....I know we usually play like crap at LittleJohn but it doesn't mean it's a 20/80 game. Their best win was against FSU when FSU dropped 42 points. I think we win this game tomorrow.
bignick33 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Clemson isn't very good....I know we usually play like crap at LittleJohn but it doesn't mean it's a 20/80 game. Their best win was against FSU when FSU dropped 42 points. I think we win this game tomorrow.
I think Clemson is a much better home team than road team.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:We're a 9 point under-dog to Clemson? That's easy money.
FirstDownSyndrome {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:We're a 9 point under-dog to Clemson? That's easy money.
which way?
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:FirstDownSyndrome {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:We're a 9 point under-dog to Clemson? That's easy money.
which way?
For BC. I can't see us losing by double digits to Clemson. I think Clemson's pretty over-rated.
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:FirstDownSyndrome {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:We're a 9 point under-dog to Clemson? That's easy money.
which way?
For BC. I can't see us losing by double digits to Clemson. I think Clemson's pretty over-rated.
I can. Gamblor has you in his claws if you're betting using emotion on a Jekyll and Hyde team.
bignick33 {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:FirstDownSyndrome {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:We're a 9 point under-dog to Clemson? That's easy money.
which way?
For BC. I can't see us losing by double digits to Clemson. I think Clemson's pretty over-rated.
I can. Gamblor has you in his claws if you're betting using emotion on a Jekyll and Hyde team.
Which is the Jekyll and Hyde team?
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:FirstDownSyndrome {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:We're a 9 point under-dog to Clemson? That's easy money.
which way?
For BC. I can't see us losing by double digits to Clemson. I think Clemson's pretty over-rated.
I can. Gamblor has you in his claws if you're betting using emotion on a Jekyll and Hyde team.
Which is the Jekyll and Hyde team?
You're right. Both - meaning even more chance for dispersions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 126 guests