HJS {l Wrote}:If we struggle (loss to URI blowout loss to FSU) so badly without a Biko Paris, what the hell is going to happen next season when we have no true point guard on the roster?
bcmurph {l Wrote}:Matt Humphrey's Scout profile also mentions that he "Will run some point on occasion"...so hopefully he'll be able to slide into Biko's role and minutes...Obviously, if Reggie were to leave, it's kitty bar the door...
HJS {l Wrote}:If we struggle (loss to URI blowout loss to FSU) so badly without a Biko Paris, what the hell is going to happen next season when we have no true point guard on the roster?
BC923 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:If we struggle (loss to URI blowout loss to FSU) so badly without a Biko Paris, what the hell is going to happen next season when we have no true point guard on the roster?
I think its less of only a point guard thing but more of a talent thing. Reggie has no targets, no one to give the ball so he can get away from his man off-ball. But unless the kids we bring in do well next season it will be ugly. I always thought next year would be worse than this year.
RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:If we struggle (loss to URI blowout loss to FSU) so badly without a Biko Paris, what the hell is going to happen next season when we have no true point guard on the roster?
Your question contains two implicit assumptions: 1) Reggie will leave for the NBA after this season; 2) BC won't recruit a point guard between now and spring.
HJS {l Wrote}:RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:If we struggle (loss to URI blowout loss to FSU) so badly without a Biko Paris, what the hell is going to happen next season when we have no true point guard on the roster?
Your question contains two implicit assumptions: 1) Reggie will leave for the NBA after this season; 2) BC won't recruit a point guard between now and spring.
1) Wait... did Reggie not play against URI or FSU?
Regardless of what position Reggie plays in the NBA, this year for this team, he acts more as a SG/scoring PG. Biko plays more of a traditional PG role (pass first, kickout threat).
2) Would seem to me that a PG would be a more pressing interest than a late Spring/Summer signing. Didn't we strike out trying to fill the same position last Spring/Summer?
RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:1) Reggie has many more assists than Biko (98-65) and a much better A/TO ratio (2.18-1.67). He functions as a scoring PG because he's the best offensive player on the team by a wide margin, which I don't think will be nearly as true next year. I think that, even if we don't get another PG, the combination Moton/Humphrey/L. Jackson will be at least adequate replacement for Biko in giving Reggie rest time.
2) The failure to get a quality PG recruit has been very frustrating, but the recruiting season isn't over yet. I can't believe the coaching staff isn't making it their first priority, since the need is so obvious. At worst, we ought to be able to find someone in 2012 if it doesn't pan out this year, since with Reggie gone any high-quality PG recruit will be able to more or less walk into the job.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Reggie is not a traditional PG. Most of his assists are on made threes. That is a deceptive use of a statistic. Without Biko, both to handle and to make the shots on the other end of Jackson's passes, BC's offense does not function because it has no PG. With Biko in, there is still no traditional PG, but at least you have two guards that can shoot the three and penetrate to apply pressure on both sides of the defense. Plus, when Reggie dominates the ball it is a ton easier to defend him.
The idea that BC will be okay at PG because Jackson will be back does not comfort me. We need a replacement for Biko. Maybe it is Moton or Humphrey, but I would prefer to see a real PG.
floocher {l Wrote}:What are the "great things" heard about Humphrey? He looks like a 6'5' wing, who played 10-15 minutes a game at Oregon over 2 seasons, scored about 5 pts/game, with 1/2 rebounds. Does not sound like a point guard or a great player. Didn't he leave Oregon under some kind of group cloud?
bignick33 {l Wrote}:floocher {l Wrote}:What are the "great things" heard about Humphrey? He looks like a 6'5' wing, who played 10-15 minutes a game at Oregon over 2 seasons, scored about 5 pts/game, with 1/2 rebounds. Does not sound like a point guard or a great player. Didn't he leave Oregon under some kind of group cloud?
While you didn't quote me, I've heard that he's been very, very good in practice so far. Word is that he's a knockdown shooter and a plus athlete.
SiValEagle {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:floocher {l Wrote}:What are the "great things" heard about Humphrey? He looks like a 6'5' wing, who played 10-15 minutes a game at Oregon over 2 seasons, scored about 5 pts/game, with 1/2 rebounds. Does not sound like a point guard or a great player. Didn't he leave Oregon under some kind of group cloud?
While you didn't quote me, I've heard that he's been very, very good in practice so far. Word is that he's a knockdown shooter and a plus athlete.
Well, if he looks good in practice, we have nothing to fear.
EagleDave {l Wrote}:For the record, during the open scrimmage before the season, Humphrey played exceptionally well...yes, Tyler Roche played in the game.
Brablc {l Wrote}:EagleDave {l Wrote}:For the record, during the open scrimmage before the season, Humphrey played exceptionally well...yes, Tyler Roche played in the game.
I concur. He was the go-to scorer on the second squad and probably the 2nd best scorer on the floor after Jackson. He also had really good range from deep.
bignick33 {l Wrote}:floocher {l Wrote}:What are the "great things" heard about Humphrey? He looks like a 6'5' wing, who played 10-15 minutes a game at Oregon over 2 seasons, scored about 5 pts/game, with 1/2 rebounds. Does not sound like a point guard or a great player. Didn't he leave Oregon under some kind of group cloud?
While you didn't quote me, I've heard that he's been very, very good in practice so far. Word is that he's a knockdown shooter and a plus athlete.
RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:Humphrey is still something of a mystery. He had a respectable list of schools interested in him as a HS senior, but his two seasons at Oregon were extremely spotty. It's good to hear that he's showing ability in practice, but it seems unwise to draw any solid conclusions until we see him in game play next season. I hope I'll be pleasantly surprised, but for now I'm uncertain about what kind of player is going to show up.
BC923 {l Wrote}:RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:Humphrey is still something of a mystery. He had a respectable list of schools interested in him as a HS senior, but his two seasons at Oregon were extremely spotty. It's good to hear that he's showing ability in practice, but it seems unwise to draw any solid conclusions until we see him in game play next season. I hope I'll be pleasantly surprised, but for now I'm uncertain about what kind of player is going to show up.
he had nagging knee injuries at oregon. If he stays healthy he can play at a high level.
RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:BC923 {l Wrote}:RedBaron67 {l Wrote}:Humphrey is still something of a mystery. He had a respectable list of schools interested in him as a HS senior, but his two seasons at Oregon were extremely spotty. It's good to hear that he's showing ability in practice, but it seems unwise to draw any solid conclusions until we see him in game play next season. I hope I'll be pleasantly surprised, but for now I'm uncertain about what kind of player is going to show up.
he had nagging knee injuries at oregon. If he stays healthy he can play at a high level.
If Humphrey had health issues at Oregon, that changes the picture. He begins to look like another reason for optimism about next year.
missoulaEagle {l Wrote}:Is Humphrey a projected starter next year?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests