eepstein0 {l Wrote}:BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:y'all know we're starting 3-0 in ACC play right?
"Y'all know we're heading into conference play at 12-3, right?"
Have faith, especially when we get to play Paul Hewitt and Sid Lowe at home. Those guys are both at coaching and their teams are bad.
Dirtywater {l Wrote}: Jackson also needs to be given a minimum shooting quota per game.
Eagledom {l Wrote}:This was a bad team coming into the season and donahue has led them to some good wins. There is ONE OR TWO ACC starters on the entire team and a bunch of role players. Did this loss suck? Yeah, but expectations were too high in the first place after Donahue led the tem to a few nice wins with the pile of dogshit he was dealt. No one expected an NCAA tournament bid at the start of the year and people started to think it might happen afer some good wins....this is going to be an up and down season with this squad...get used to it.
AdamBC {l Wrote}:It will be nice if the team plays in front of 5K tonight.
apbc12 {l Wrote}:Who's it going to be? Somebody needs to call for Donahue's head. Or was that just a Skinner thing?
Some of you crack me up. January 1: BC beats South Carolina, team is declared significantly improved, the dark days of Skinner's reign of lazy terror are finally behind us! January 5: BC loses to Harvard, team is declared awful, all hopes of NCAA tournament dashed forever.
Art Vandelay {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:Who's it going to be? Somebody needs to call for Donahue's head. Or was that just a Skinner thing?
Some of you crack me up. January 1: BC beats South Carolina, team is declared significantly improved, the dark days of Skinner's reign of lazy terror are finally behind us! January 5: BC loses to Harvard, team is declared awful, all hopes of NCAA tournament dashed forever.
Are you actually surprised by extreme reactions to the last thing we saw by posters on this board? The funny thing is every year people on this board tend to overrate the team and this year I thought expectations of a bit of an up and down season were realistic by most. Apparently beating some mediocre teams changed everyone's expectations along the way.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Art Vandelay {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:Who's it going to be? Somebody needs to call for Donahue's head. Or was that just a Skinner thing?
Some of you crack me up. January 1: BC beats South Carolina, team is declared significantly improved, the dark days of Skinner's reign of lazy terror are finally behind us! January 5: BC loses to Harvard, team is declared awful, all hopes of NCAA tournament dashed forever.
Are you actually surprised by extreme reactions to the last thing we saw by posters on this board? The funny thing is every year people on this board tend to overrate the team and this year I thought expectations of a bit of an up and down season were realistic by most. Apparently beating some mediocre teams changed everyone's expectations along the way.
This team can be much better than mediocre....
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Art Vandelay {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:Who's it going to be? Somebody needs to call for Donahue's head. Or was that just a Skinner thing?
Some of you crack me up. January 1: BC beats South Carolina, team is declared significantly improved, the dark days of Skinner's reign of lazy terror are finally behind us! January 5: BC loses to Harvard, team is declared awful, all hopes of NCAA tournament dashed forever.
Are you actually surprised by extreme reactions to the last thing we saw by posters on this board? The funny thing is every year people on this board tend to overrate the team and this year I thought expectations of a bit of an up and down season were realistic by most. Apparently beating some mediocre teams changed everyone's expectations along the way.
This team can be much better than mediocre....
and as they proved last night they can also be worse. i'm going to start smiting posters when they express that this can be an ncaa tournament team based on some mediocre wins (and ignoring some horrific losses)
Caber91 {l Wrote}:Not that surprising of a loss. This team will be erratic, given its reliance on so many 3's. The fact that anyone looked at this team and thought it was a NCAA lock is laughable. But come on, life goes on here. With the recruiting class coming in, and with Jackson (yes, I know he is streaky, but the guy is a truly talented guard), the future is brighter. Hey, we could still have Coach Handsome here spending all of his time at the Plex playing hoops, when he should have been recruiting.
Art Vandelay {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Art Vandelay {l Wrote}:apbc12 {l Wrote}:Who's it going to be? Somebody needs to call for Donahue's head. Or was that just a Skinner thing?
Some of you crack me up. January 1: BC beats South Carolina, team is declared significantly improved, the dark days of Skinner's reign of lazy terror are finally behind us! January 5: BC loses to Harvard, team is declared awful, all hopes of NCAA tournament dashed forever.
Are you actually surprised by extreme reactions to the last thing we saw by posters on this board? The funny thing is every year people on this board tend to overrate the team and this year I thought expectations of a bit of an up and down season were realistic by most. Apparently beating some mediocre teams changed everyone's expectations along the way.
This team can be much better than mediocre....
Not sure what leads you to believe that. It can't be the results because a better than mediocre team does not lose to Harvard, Yale and URI. We have one truly ACC caliber player so what more would you expect?
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:My favorite part is the rush to throw the players under the bus. This is, was, and always has been, a 20-win bubble team. It was even more than that last year, making Al's performance last year all the more depressing. But make no mistake, a good coach makes this squad a bubble team.
And losing to Yale and Harvard does not get him off the hook, with people saying the talent must not be that good. It's a black mark - this team shouldn't lose to either, but certainly not both.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests