Ed Cooley to Interview Tomorrow

[bignick33]

I'm not sure why Coen is widely regarded here as a higher-profile/better candidate as Cooley. I'd probably rate them as comparable. That being said, I don't think BC hires either.

[EagleManiac66]

I'm not sure why Coen is widely regarded here as a higher-profile/better candidate as Cooley. I'd probably rate them as comparable. That being said, I don't think BC hires either.

I hope that you're correct. Otherwise Gene will have taken a big step only to fall on his face.

[ATLeagle]

I get that Cooley is willing to market the program and shows some fire, but if we are going with Skinner guys wouldn't we want Coen who has the eye for talent? Both have and will run the flex, so that is a wash.

[eepstein0]

I get that Cooley is willing to market the program and shows some fire, but if we are going with Skinner guys wouldn't we want Coen who has the eye for talent? Both have and will run the flex, so that is a wash.

I want neither. But if you make me pick one, it's Coen.

[EagleManiac66]

I get that Cooley is willing to market the program and shows some fire, but if we are going with Skinner guys wouldn't we want Coen who has the eye for talent? Both have and will run the flex, so that is a wash.

I want neither. But if you make me pick one, it's Coen.

I tend to agree. I'd give Coen a slight edge on being a more enthusiastic recruiter (just a feeling). What a lost opportunity if we go with either.

[BCEagle74]

Let me set you morons straight.

Al Skinner never had a coaching tree and he never will.

George Welsh never had a coaching tree and never will.

If these two Puscadores had a tree, it again, would be a Bonsai Tree.

I want someone to read this aloud at my euology. Preferably 74 himself.

I noticed this and please don't die Rev.