So... You have no links even thought these are allegedly "well known facts". Thank you.
BTW... the argument isn't about whether TOB should've been paid more. The argument is whether BC has the resources to pay more but GDF chooses not to.
HJS {l Wrote}:BTW... the argument isn't about whether TOB should've been paid more. The argument is whether BC has the resources to pay more but GDF chooses not to.
HJS {l Wrote}:So... You have no links even thought these are allegedly "well known facts". Thank you.
BTW... the argument isn't about whether TOB should've been paid more. The argument is whether BC has the resources to pay more but GDF chooses not to.
bignick33 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:BTW... the argument isn't about whether TOB should've been paid more. The argument is whether BC has the resources to pay more but GDF chooses not to.
TOB is such a hideous example though.
HJS {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:BTW... the argument isn't about whether TOB should've been paid more. The argument is whether BC has the resources to pay more but GDF chooses not to.
TOB is such a hideous example though.
Agreed. But, when pedro and Talon won't except anything but PROOF, I have to go with what I have. The fact remains BC has resources at its disposal but Gene refuses to tap into them. That is all I am saying. And yet, we are on Page 4 of a thread because someone refuses to acknowledge these two simple facts.
HJS {l Wrote}:bignick33 {l Wrote}:HJS {l Wrote}:BTW... the argument isn't about whether TOB should've been paid more. The argument is whether BC has the resources to pay more but GDF chooses not to.
TOB is such a hideous example though.
Agreed. But, when pedro and Talon won't except anything but PROOF, I have to go with what I have. The fact remains BC has resources at its disposal but Gene refuses to tap into them. That is all I am saying. And yet, we are on Page 4 of a thread because someone refuses to acknowledge these two simple facts.
MaxxPower325 {l Wrote}:2) Why would GDF choose to underpay any coach if he did not have to? Wouldn't his reputation and prestige grow with the success of the teams he oversees? If the $$$ was limitless (within reason...) why would he short-change his own career ambitions? Why not blow the big money to bring in a Who's Who of the coaching world??? The reality is the the very same coaches who would be attracted to that sales pitch would never come to BC and risk their "reputations" on a program that actually asks their kids to learn something and graduate.
HJS {l Wrote}:MaxxPower325 {l Wrote}:2) Why would GDF choose to underpay any coach if he did not have to? Wouldn't his reputation and prestige grow with the success of the teams he oversees? If the $$$ was limitless (within reason...) why would he short-change his own career ambitions? Why not blow the big money to bring in a Who's Who of the coaching world??? The reality is the the very same coaches who would be attracted to that sales pitch would never come to BC and risk their "reputations" on a program that actually asks their kids to learn something and graduate.
Paying a coaches $2mm a year brings about two things unwanted by GDF. First and foremost, it gives the coach independence from the AD. Second, it creates financial and public expectations of success which puts significant pressure upon the AD should it not be attained.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests