Page 1 of 2

Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 10:32 am
by claver2010
Pop out indefinitely with a back injury

i will say he hasn't looked right in a while

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 10:41 am
by BC923
Are injuries becoming a bigger problem in basketball? Feel like Skinner teams were so healthy, but might be my memory.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 11:07 am
by sparky
Someday we'll look back at this season and laugh.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 11:46 am
by 2001Eagle
This will be a curb stomping.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:46 pm
by eepstein0
Makes sense on Pop.

They’re going to get crushed by ND

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:55 pm
by MilitantEagle
Surprising first half. Thornton decided to show up today and Heath playing well. Luka being Luka.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 3:41 pm
by claver2010
certainly been surprising, see if they can finish

luka has to be the worst player in p5 basketball

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 3:56 pm
by Los
This has dick punch written all over it.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:16 pm
by Tom Dooder
EXTENSION!!

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:18 pm
by MilitantEagle
Only Christian can show we he should be fired after an ACC road win. What a pathetic finish.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:22 pm
by innocentbystander
MilitantEagle wrote:Only Christian can show we he should be fired after an ACC road win. What a pathetic finish.


Doesn't matter.

Biggest win on the road for BC since they knocked off 25-0 Syracuse team in upstate New York. Huge win, a monster. Well done team, well done Jim Christian. BC is #1 in the ACC (at the moment.) Still wont save Jim Christian's job.

He has to win a game after March 18th and it must be in the real tournament, not the "Not-In-Tournament" tournament. That is the only thing that will save his ass. And even that might not do it.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 4:36 pm
by claver2010
terrible breaking the press obviously but why is the officiating constantly so terrible in that building? 23-2 in not intentionally given free throws

good win, great to see heath back on track

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 5:14 pm
by Dick Rosenthal
Notre Dame was mediocre to begin with and with the injury to Carmody and the impending transfers they are absolutely awful. With that said, a win is a win and I guess being the third worst team in the ACC is an improvement from last year.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 5:55 pm
by 2014 Eagle
I was surprised to learn how long it has been since BC last beat ND. Good to get the win (especially after the hockey win over ND last night), although it felt like we were inevitably going to lose watching those last few minutes. Weird start to the year...5-5 (2-0)

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 7:49 pm
by 2001Eagle
Always glad when they win. But I think anything less than a NIT berth and JC is gone.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 8:48 pm
by claver2010
2001Eagle wrote:Always glad when they win. But I think anything less than a NIT berth and JC is gone.


'We look at the whole body of work. We evaluate throughout the year, but I started talking with Father Leahy at the end of the season and we connected and we just felt like the trajectory that we were on, I didn't feel like we were making the progress competitively that we needed to. We want to be more competitive in conference and nationally, and I just felt with the total body of work that we, that it was time to make a change.'

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 8:54 pm
by MilitantEagle
claver2010 wrote:
2001Eagle wrote:Always glad when they win. But I think anything less than a NIT berth and JC is gone.


'We look at the whole body of work. We evaluate throughout the year, but I started talking with Father Leahy at the end of the season and we connected and we just felt like the trajectory that we were on, I didn't feel like we were making the progress competitively that we needed to. We want to be more competitive in conference and nationally, and I just felt with the total body of work that we, that it was time to make a change.'


BC has no chance at the NIT. They have tripped up so badly in OOC games that getting to over .500 overall would require winning their 3 remaining OOC games and going 8-10 in their remaining ACC games. Not gonna happen.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 8:56 pm
by eepstein0
MilitantEagle wrote:
claver2010 wrote:
2001Eagle wrote:Always glad when they win. But I think anything less than a NIT berth and JC is gone.


'We look at the whole body of work. We evaluate throughout the year, but I started talking with Father Leahy at the end of the season and we connected and we just felt like the trajectory that we were on, I didn't feel like we were making the progress competitively that we needed to. We want to be more competitive in conference and nationally, and I just felt with the total body of work that we, that it was time to make a change.'


BC has no chance at the NIT. They have tripped up so badly in OOC games that getting to over .500 overall would require winning their 3 remaining OOC games and going 8-10 in their remaining ACC games. Not gonna happen.


I tend to agree but the bottom of the ACC is really bad

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 10:14 pm
by Corporal Funishment
Yes, nice win but it's all gone to hell already

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 10:25 pm
by Logitano
Shout out to the ACC refs for a heroic effort keeping ND in the game.

The end was comical but a win is a win and there was some effort. :ace

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 8:54 am
by claver2010
coached by another man next year's team has some decent talent

G: Tabbs (SO), Heath (SO), Langford (FR), MAL (SR)
F: Rishwain (SO), Felder (SO), Hamilton (JR), Steff (SR)
C: Pop (RS?), Vander Baan (FR)

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 10:26 am
by innocentbystander
2001Eagle wrote:Always glad when they win. But I think anything less than a NIT berth and JC is gone.


I don't think that will save him. Getting into the Not-In-Tournament "tournament" is not all that much different than going 6-6 and getting BC into Shreveport or wherever. That didn't save Addazio this year.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 10:33 am
by BC923
If the coverage Jarmond gets for the Daz firing/new hiring is positive it cranks the heat up under Christian’s seat a lot. If it’s negative (it won’t be because BC does extremely well in pushing our narrative to ESPN) then his seat cools down

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:18 pm
by eepstein0
claver2010 wrote:coached by another man next year's team has some decent talent

G: Tabbs (SO), Heath (SO), Langford (FR), MAL (SR)
F: Rishwain (SO), Felder (SO), Hamilton (JR), Steff (SR)
C: Pop (RS?), Vander Baan (FR)


Those Langford kids aren’t sticking around and you’ll get a bunch of transfers under a new coach.

JC is feeling the heat based on some of the media puff pieces his agent has thrown out

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Sun Dec 08, 2019 9:32 pm
by Tom Dooder
eepstein0 wrote:
claver2010 wrote:coached by another man next year's team has some decent talent

G: Tabbs (SO), Heath (SO), Langford (FR), MAL (SR)
F: Rishwain (SO), Felder (SO), Hamilton (JR), Steff (SR)
C: Pop (RS?), Vander Baan (FR)


Those Langford kids aren’t sticking around and you’ll get a bunch of transfers under a new coach.

JC is feeling the heat based on some of the media puff pieces his agent has thrown out


Keep Spinelli and the Langford’s stick around. No way the older transfers to sit another year and they want to play together.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 11:54 am
by Los
Logitano wrote:Shout out to the ACC refs for a heroic effort keeping ND in the game.

The end was comical but a win is a win and there was some effort. :ace

Some of the fouls by BC at the end were a little ticky tack, but it wasn't the refs who weren't able to break the press or get a simple inbounds pass in. BC did everything in its power to hand that game over to ND.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:04 pm
by eepstein0
Tom Dooder wrote:
eepstein0 wrote:
claver2010 wrote:coached by another man next year's team has some decent talent

G: Tabbs (SO), Heath (SO), Langford (FR), MAL (SR)
F: Rishwain (SO), Felder (SO), Hamilton (JR), Steff (SR)
C: Pop (RS?), Vander Baan (FR)


Those Langford kids aren’t sticking around and you’ll get a bunch of transfers under a new coach.

JC is feeling the heat based on some of the media puff pieces his agent has thrown out


Keep Spinelli and the Langford’s stick around. No way the older transfers to sit another year and they want to play together.


When they fire JC I’m sure he can get a waiver.

People on this board way over rate the talent on this team.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 2:00 pm
by MilitantEagle
eepstein0 wrote:
Tom Dooder wrote:
eepstein0 wrote:
claver2010 wrote:coached by another man next year's team has some decent talent

G: Tabbs (SO), Heath (SO), Langford (FR), MAL (SR)
F: Rishwain (SO), Felder (SO), Hamilton (JR), Steff (SR)
C: Pop (RS?), Vander Baan (FR)


Those Langford kids aren’t sticking around and you’ll get a bunch of transfers under a new coach.

JC is feeling the heat based on some of the media puff pieces his agent has thrown out


Keep Spinelli and the Langford’s stick around. No way the older transfers to sit another year and they want to play together.


When they fire JC I’m sure he can get a waiver.

People on this board way over rate the talent on this team.


I think the roster will certainly be respectable, but the challenge is rebuilding a roster after we blow it up again. It's taken us 7 years to get to a point where the roster doesn't look atrocious. With another mass exodus, I don't know that we'll find replacements all that quickly.

I'm wondering if it's worth removing a couple of assistants instead of JC and having a big budget to hire a couple of top assistants. JC is bad, but a rebuild is painful.

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 3:15 pm
by eepstein0
MilitantEagle wrote:
eepstein0 wrote:
Tom Dooder wrote:
eepstein0 wrote:
claver2010 wrote:coached by another man next year's team has some decent talent

G: Tabbs (SO), Heath (SO), Langford (FR), MAL (SR)
F: Rishwain (SO), Felder (SO), Hamilton (JR), Steff (SR)
C: Pop (RS?), Vander Baan (FR)


Those Langford kids aren’t sticking around and you’ll get a bunch of transfers under a new coach.

JC is feeling the heat based on some of the media puff pieces his agent has thrown out


Keep Spinelli and the Langford’s stick around. No way the older transfers to sit another year and they want to play together.


When they fire JC I’m sure he can get a waiver.

People on this board way over rate the talent on this team.


I think the roster will certainly be respectable, but the challenge is rebuilding a roster after we blow it up again. It's taken us 7 years to get to a point where the roster doesn't look atrocious. With another mass exodus, I don't know that we'll find replacements all that quickly.

I'm wondering if it's worth removing a couple of assistants instead of JC and having a big budget to hire a couple of top assistants. JC is bad, but a rebuild is painful.


This same roster lost to a team who lost by double digits to Merrimack at home. This entire thing needs to be blown up and restarted with a real coach

Re: Game 10 - Notre Dame

PostPosted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 3:44 pm
by ATLeagle
I bet Langford comes regardless. Brother on the roster. Dad starting a basketball academy in Worcester. Lots of Under Armour connections.