GodofBeasts94 {l Wrote}:If we're really running the offense -- and by that I mean the ultra-tight flex -- does the point guard really matter? He makes the first [painful] bounce pass to the elbow -- and then mayhem ensures within the paint. Maybe the point gets it back when he circles back around the top.....but maybe not.
Biko seems much more important as a distributor of the ball when 1) we're on the break (which hopefully we will be a lot) and/or 2) we're running a more relaxed offense like we did in the first half yesterday.
I think Al is going to surprise us this year and open things up a little. Maybe it's still a flex but we won't have five guys crowding around the key.
My fingers are crossed, but you guys are probably right. Inertia is a powerful force in Al's playbook....
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:The offense isn't going to "open up". We're still going to run that ridiculous offense of his. And no I'm not OJ or anything like that but I really do hate the flex. 5 guys are going to be in the paint, Southern will telegraph a pass and then cue hightlight reel dunk for other team.GodofBeasts94 {l Wrote}:If we're really running the offense -- and by that I mean the ultra-tight flex -- does the point guard really matter? He makes the first [painful] bounce pass to the elbow -- and then mayhem ensures within the paint. Maybe the point gets it back when he circles back around the top.....but maybe not.
Biko seems much more important as a distributor of the ball when 1) we're on the break (which hopefully we will be a lot) and/or 2) we're running a more relaxed offense like we did in the first half yesterday.
I think Al is going to surprise us this year and open things up a little. Maybe it's still a flex but we won't have five guys crowding around the key.
My fingers are crossed, but you guys are probably right. Inertia is a powerful force in Al's playbook....
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:The offense isn't going to "open up". We're still going to run that ridiculous offense of his. And no I'm not OJ or anything like that but I really do hate the flex. 5 guys are going to be in the paint, Southern will telegraph a pass and then cue hightlight reel dunk for other team.GodofBeasts94 {l Wrote}:If we're really running the offense -- and by that I mean the ultra-tight flex -- does the point guard really matter? He makes the first [painful] bounce pass to the elbow -- and then mayhem ensures within the paint. Maybe the point gets it back when he circles back around the top.....but maybe not.
Biko seems much more important as a distributor of the ball when 1) we're on the break (which hopefully we will be a lot) and/or 2) we're running a more relaxed offense like we did in the first half yesterday.
I think Al is going to surprise us this year and open things up a little. Maybe it's still a flex but we won't have five guys crowding around the key.
My fingers are crossed, but you guys are probably right. Inertia is a powerful force in Al's playbook....
You aren't OJ, because Eagledom-ass is OJ.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:The offense isn't going to "open up". We're still going to run that ridiculous offense of his. And no I'm not OJ or anything like that but I really do hate the flex. 5 guys are going to be in the paint, Southern will telegraph a pass and then cue hightlight reel dunk for other team.GodofBeasts94 {l Wrote}:If we're really running the offense -- and by that I mean the ultra-tight flex -- does the point guard really matter? He makes the first [painful] bounce pass to the elbow -- and then mayhem ensures within the paint. Maybe the point gets it back when he circles back around the top.....but maybe not.
Biko seems much more important as a distributor of the ball when 1) we're on the break (which hopefully we will be a lot) and/or 2) we're running a more relaxed offense like we did in the first half yesterday.
I think Al is going to surprise us this year and open things up a little. Maybe it's still a flex but we won't have five guys crowding around the key.
My fingers are crossed, but you guys are probably right. Inertia is a powerful force in Al's playbook....
You aren't OJ, because Eagledom-ass is OJ.
jrlbc06 {l Wrote}:If we win with the flex I'm not going to complain.
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:People realize that the tight flex was an adaptation by Al, right? We didn't run it that tight when we had Bell nor did Al run it at URI like when he had smallish lineups. He ran more traditional flexes. We didn't go tight until it became so devastating with Smith and Dudley. I imagine he wants to revert to it now because he's got a fairly big lineup and doesn't have many true shooters. It is the right idea and will probably be very efficient.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:ATLeagle {l Wrote}:People realize that the tight flex was an adaptation by Al, right? We didn't run it that tight when we had Bell nor did Al run it at URI like when he had smallish lineups. He ran more traditional flexes. We didn't go tight until it became so devastating with Smith and Dudley. I imagine he wants to revert to it now because he's got a fairly big lineup and doesn't have many true shooters. It is the right idea and will probably be very efficient.
Agree with your point about Al adapting - the flex is supposed to be spread out. That said, this is not a tight flex team - only Sanders and maybe Raji would benefit from eliminating spacing, unlike the Smith/Dudley/Marshall teams. Trapani, Paris, Jackson - all better with more room.
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
Chilltown {l Wrote}:Why everyone gets hung up on the offense is beyond me. Over the past 4 years in the ACC, Skinner's flex (call it tight, loose, whatever you want) has been in the top 3 of offensive efficiency (as measured by points per possession). This year, I think we will see more of the same.
The key is the defense. Last year, BC was the 2nd worst team in defensive efficiency (giving up 1.11 points per possession). If this team is to make the leap, it needs to happen on the defensive end.
cvilleagle {l Wrote}:And I worry about our lack of size when it comes to defense. We have Southern, but he's not much of a shot-blocker, and even if he was you can't rely on him because of the fouls. Hopefully he has figured that out some.
Eagledom {l Wrote}:cvilleagle {l Wrote}:And I worry about our lack of size when it comes to defense. We have Southern, but he's not much of a shot-blocker, and even if he was you can't rely on him because of the fouls. Hopefully he has figured that out some.
It is an issue and will continue to be until we recruit a true power forward. As far as Southern's shot blocking, he is not a shot blocker at all and will have to rely on positioning (he has like a 4" vertical). Problem is, he is so slow that he gets out of position a lot - hence the dumb fouls.
The good thing is that there aren't that many teams in the ACC that can take advantage of BC's weaknesses like Wake and Clemson were able to last year. Bad news is you get a match up like USC in the tourney and are completely outmatched.
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Eagledom {l Wrote}:cvilleagle {l Wrote}:And I worry about our lack of size when it comes to defense. We have Southern, but he's not much of a shot-blocker, and even if he was you can't rely on him because of the fouls. Hopefully he has figured that out some.
It is an issue and will continue to be until we recruit a true power forward. As far as Southern's shot blocking, he is not a shot blocker at all and will have to rely on positioning (he has like a 4" vertical). Problem is, he is so slow that he gets out of position a lot - hence the dumb fouls.
The good thing is that there aren't that many teams in the ACC that can take advantage of BC's weaknesses like Wake and Clemson were able to last year. Bad news is you get a match up like USC in the tourney and are completely outmatched.
Using the mostest cheatingest program in D1 basketball might not be the best way to make your point.
Eagledom {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Eagledom {l Wrote}:cvilleagle {l Wrote}:And I worry about our lack of size when it comes to defense. We have Southern, but he's not much of a shot-blocker, and even if he was you can't rely on him because of the fouls. Hopefully he has figured that out some.
It is an issue and will continue to be until we recruit a true power forward. As far as Southern's shot blocking, he is not a shot blocker at all and will have to rely on positioning (he has like a 4" vertical). Problem is, he is so slow that he gets out of position a lot - hence the dumb fouls.
The good thing is that there aren't that many teams in the ACC that can take advantage of BC's weaknesses like Wake and Clemson were able to last year. Bad news is you get a match up like USC in the tourney and are completely outmatched.
Using the mostest cheatingest program in D1 basketball might not be the best way to make your point.
I used 3 teams to make the point, not just USC. Also, how many teams did USC beat in the tourney besides BC? The point is that BC still has weaknesses that will be exploited by certain matchups....all teams do to some extent, but BC's front court size and rebounding ability might be a glaring weakness on anotherwise good team.
ATLeagle {l Wrote}:Great post about the defense. That has been the main problem. I think it isn't about the type of players. I think Al needs a more defined defensive scheme. Right now the ameoba leaves the other team to too many easy baskets and doesn't get enough offensive rebounds.
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests