Page 1 of 2

Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:23 pm
by eepstein0
This game makes me very very nervous

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 11:52 pm
by Corporal Funishment
Pitt is statistically almost exactly as bad this year as we were in 2016. They're not patricularly good at anything but they take a lot of threes so some concern is warranted given our proclivity for helping 30 feet off shooters spotting up in the far corner

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:22 am
by Cadillac90
This should be a feel good game. Pitt is awful.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:34 am
by eepstein0
Cadillac90 wrote:This should be a feel good game. Pitt is awful.


I'd agree with you if we weren't such an awful road team.

I think we win, I just don't think it'll be a 20-30 point romp people are expecting.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:37 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
vegas says 6 and that feels about right.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:01 am
by twballgame9
This is a game that feels like BC is free money but it isn't

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:06 am
by angrychicken
BC will win by 11.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:32 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
twballgame9 wrote:This is a game that feels like BC is free money but it isn't

i'm not touching any action on this game because jimmy mac is still our coach and armin tamzarian basically gave jimmy a free pass on a pink slip at his claver-fest last week

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:35 pm
by 2001Eagle
I’m expecting a total shit the bed loss because as BC fan and a Mets fan, that’s what happens.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:07 pm
by eepstein0
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:vegas says 6 and that feels about right.


Someone in Vegas is hitting the BC side of the line hard it’s all the way up to 8.5

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:33 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
eepstein0 wrote:
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:vegas says 6 and that feels about right.


Someone in Vegas is hitting the BC side of the line hard it’s all the way up to 8.5

probably nospace. he's likely filling his water container out at hiss expense-free ranch and stopped in town to drop a few thou' on the eagles

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:00 pm
by twballgame9
eepstein0 wrote:
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:vegas says 6 and that feels about right.


Someone in Vegas is hitting the BC side of the line hard it’s all the way up to 8.5


They probably don't realize the BC guards are incapable of playing defense. More's the pity for them.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:01 pm
by eepstein0
The ghosts traveled to Pitt?

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:26 pm
by eepstein0
Incredibly dumb T on JRob that’s 3 fouls.

This could get ugly quickly

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:31 pm
by BCEagles25
Vin Baker with the turnover and then huge miscommunication on defense... that's like a 3 to 6 point swing. Ouch.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:31 pm
by BCEagles25
BCEagles25 wrote:Vin Baker with the turnover and then huge miscommunication on defense... that's like a 3 to 6 point swing. Ouch.


And then he hits a three and I can go fuck myself

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:38 pm
by eepstein0
BCEagles25 wrote:
BCEagles25 wrote:Vin Baker with the turnover and then huge miscommunication on defense... that's like a 3 to 6 point swing. Ouch.


And then he hits a three and I can go fuck myself


The only reason BC is even hanging around is that Pitt is very bad

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:44 pm
by BCEagles25
eepstein0 wrote:
BCEagles25 wrote:
BCEagles25 wrote:Vin Baker with the turnover and then huge miscommunication on defense... that's like a 3 to 6 point swing. Ouch.


And then he hits a three and I can go fuck myself


The only reason BC is even hanging around is that Pitt is very bad


Pitt is like 2016 BC bad. I don't normally root for a team to go 0-18, but it happened to us so fuck them

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:45 pm
by BCEagles25
Vin Baker is like 85% legs, I think he'll eventually be a good three and D guy

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:46 pm
by eepstein0
BCEagles25 wrote:Vin Baker is like 85% legs, I think he'll eventually be a good three and D guy


I give him a ton of credit he’s playing much more confident

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:48 pm
by MF73-Eleazar
I switched away when it was 28-13, I think? 34-32 at the half, eh? Nice, with JRob on the bench, too.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 7:49 pm
by Los
If BC didn't keep spotting teams 9 points to start the game they'd probably be leading by a dozen at the break in this one.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:06 pm
by eepstein0
Much better

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:20 pm
by eepstein0
39-12 run for BC

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 8:40 pm
by eepstein0
Is our BPI and RPI so bad because of a bad OOC schedule?

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 9:13 pm
by MF73-Eleazar
closed out the game 68-30? JRob solidly in the mix for ACCPOY, right?

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 11:06 pm
by Los
MF73-Eleazar wrote:closed out the game 68-30? JRob solidly in the mix for ACCPOY, right?


Short list.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 7:47 am
by twballgame9
He's in the mix with no shot of winning. Thirteen third place votes situation. Great year though.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:31 am
by eepstein0
twballgame9 wrote:He's in the mix with no shot of winning. Thirteen third place votes situation. Great year though.


Bagley, Maye and Robinson?

Robinson is way more deserving over those guys.

Re: Pitt Gamethread

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2018 8:45 am
by DomingoOrtiz
eepstein0 wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:He's in the mix with no shot of winning. Thirteen third place votes situation. Great year though.


Bagley, Maye and Robinson?

Robinson is way more deserving over those guys.


Bagley 21.5 ppg
Robinson 20.7
Battle 20.3
Maye 18.3

Bagley is also leading the ACC in rebounding.