EagleOutsider.com

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

MaxxPower325 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Both Boston teams decided to have three point shooting contests with teams that shoot better than they do..

BCs shots are contested.

NDs shots are wide open

Both home teams have license. Toronto is molesting the Celtics

To your point, BC with 12 fouls, ND with 5...

This has nothing to do with the officials

This game had a shit ton to do with the way it was called. You are a moron.

It didn’t but whatever. BC leaving shooters wide open all night is the story of this game

Too bad they couldn't tackle like the white stiff Hoosier lineup from south bend.

One of the guards would’ve needed to be close enough to actually tackle someone.

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:We didn’t cover anyone. This is a broken Notre Dame team, one that looked like it had given up on the season the last few games. Can we all agree now the Christian-era farce need to end now?

I’m not really sure what the benefit of retaining Christian is at this point.

I’d rather suffer through another 4 year rebuild then watch another season of 95-85 losses every night.

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Having 0 depth in Year 4 is also 100% on JC.

They’re literally down to a 6 man rotation

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Your starting lineup next year is Bowman, Chatman, Hamilton, Mitchell, Popovic

Your head coach is Jimmy Christian

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Your starting lineup next year is Bowman, Chatman, Hamilton, Mitchell, Popovic

Your head coach is Jimmy Christian

You calling Robinson pulling a Hanlan? Which Greek team you think he ends up playing for? You and TRE (rhymes with 16 ppg in the G League) should get a bet going.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Your starting lineup next year is Bowman, Chatman, Hamilton, Mitchell, Popovic

Your head coach is Jimmy Christian

You calling Robinson pulling a Hanlan? Which Greek team you think he ends up playing for? You and TRE (rhymes with 16 ppg in the G League) should get a bet going.

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Your starting lineup next year is Bowman, Chatman, Hamilton, Mitchell, Popovic

Your head coach is Jimmy Christian

You calling Robinson pulling a Hanlan? Which Greek team you think he ends up playing for? You and TRE (rhymes with 16 ppg in the G League) should get a bet going.

I would love to if Wacko Tobacco has still yet to learn anything from the repeated embarrassments

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Do you really think this team will be significantly improved with Hamilton & Tabbs?

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Wacko Tobacco

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Do you really think this team will be significantly improved with Hamilton & Tabbs?

If all the first round draft picks stay, yes, its a tremendous improvement. The depth alone could give them 3-4 more wins, but if these two play to their accolades, then it could be more than that. I get your value to the board as a purveyor of tropes, but to suggest otherwise is kind of dumb. You're better than this, stick to picking on the Eddie Odios.

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Do you really think this team will be significantly improved with Hamilton & Tabbs?

If all the first round draft picks stay, yes, its a tremendous improvement. The depth alone could give them 3-4 more wins, but if these two play to their accolades, then it could be more than that. I get your value to the board as a purveyor of tropes, but to suggest otherwise is kind of dumb. You're better than this, stick to picking on the Eddie Odios.

Other teams are still going to abuse BC defensively.

angrychicken {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Your starting lineup next year is Bowman, Chatman, Hamilton, Mitchell, Popovic

Your head coach is Jimmy Christian

You calling Robinson pulling a Hanlan? Which Greek team you think he ends up playing for? You and TRE (rhymes with 16 ppg in the G League) should get a bet going.

I would love to if Wacko Tobacco has still yet to learn anything from the repeated embarrassments

Does this look like the kind of guy who would learn anything from repeated embarrassments?

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Do you really think this team will be significantly improved with Hamilton & Tabbs?

If all the first round draft picks stay, yes, its a tremendous improvement. The depth alone could give them 3-4 more wins, but if these two play to their accolades, then it could be more than that. I get your value to the board as a purveyor of tropes, but to suggest otherwise is kind of dumb. You're better than this, stick to picking on the Eddie Odios.

Other teams are still going to abuse BC defensively.

Like I said, their defensive issues are directly correlated to the inability to substitute.

Primetime {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:We didn’t cover anyone. This is a broken Notre Dame team, one that looked like it had given up on the season the last few games. Can we all agree now the Christian-era farce need to end now?

I’m not really sure what the benefit of retaining Christian is at this point.

I’d rather suffer through another 4 year rebuild then watch another season of 95-85 losses every night.

I'm usually as optimistic as anybody on this board - but I will say that while the competitiveness of the team is much improved from prior years, there need to be results at some point. 4-7 in the ACC ain't great. There are a lot of winnable games remaining, but if I were MJ I would consider the gap between 5-6 ACC wins and 8-9 ACC wins when thinking of retaining Christian.

Of note is the fact that while the team's overall record is 14-10, their record against "quality" teams (i.e. those ranked in the Top 65 per Kenpom.com) is just 2-10.

guru2 {l Wrote}:

Primetime {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:We didn’t cover anyone. This is a broken Notre Dame team, one that looked like it had given up on the season the last few games. Can we all agree now the Christian-era farce need to end now?

I’m not really sure what the benefit of retaining Christian is at this point.

I’d rather suffer through another 4 year rebuild then watch another season of 95-85 losses every night.

I'm usually as optimistic as anybody on this board - but I will say that while the competitiveness of the team is much improved from prior years, there need to be results at some point. 4-7 in the ACC ain't great. There are a lot of winnable games remaining, but if I were MJ I would consider the gap between 5-6 ACC wins and 8-9 ACC wins when thinking of retaining Christian.

Of note is the fact that while the team's overall record is 14-10, their record against "quality" teams (i.e. those ranked in the Top 65 per Kenpom.com) is just 2-10.

what about the 1 point loss/moral victory at UVa? That is worth 6 victories right?

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Do you really think this team will be significantly improved with Hamilton & Tabbs?

If all the first round draft picks stay, yes, its a tremendous improvement. The depth alone could give them 3-4 more wins, but if these two play to their accolades, then it could be more than that. I get your value to the board as a purveyor of tropes, but to suggest otherwise is kind of dumb. You're better than this, stick to picking on the Eddie Odios.

Other teams are still going to abuse BC defensively.

Like I said, their defensive issues are directly correlated to the inability to substitute.

Exactly, and we will benefit with depth... Bringing Robinson, Bowman, and Chatman's minutes down about 5-7 each and giving them to Tabbs will do a lot. This is evidenced directly by literally any basketball game you've ever played. Guarding talented players is absolutely terrible when you're exhausted and have been fighting through screens and sprinting up and down the court for 35 minutes.

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:We really don't need Hamilton and Tabbs decommitting with a coaching change. I also think the depth Tabbs will add being able to spot Ky and Jerome will be very valuable, and we'll have Luka, Pop and Steffon Mitchell as bigs depth. Chatman will be someone who probably will start at the 3 next year unless they put Hamilton there and Mitchell at the 4 with Chatman providing 20 or so minutes of guard depth. I like the future. Next year will be the show me year, but I want to see them finish this year in the NIT with 18 wins or so

Do you really think this team will be significantly improved with Hamilton & Tabbs?

If all the first round draft picks stay, yes, its a tremendous improvement. The depth alone could give them 3-4 more wins, but if these two play to their accolades, then it could be more than that. I get your value to the board as a purveyor of tropes, but to suggest otherwise is kind of dumb. You're better than this, stick to picking on the Eddie Odios.

Other teams are still going to abuse BC defensively.

Like I said, their defensive issues are directly correlated to the inability to substitute.

Exactly, and we will benefit with depth... Bringing Robinson, Bowman, and Chatman's minutes down about 5-7 each and giving them to Tabbs will do a lot. This is evidenced directly by literally any basketball game you've ever played. Guarding talented players is absolutely terrible when you're exhausted and have been fighting through screens and sprinting up and down the court for 35 minutes.

This doesn’t explain why our defense blows in the first half also

claver2010 {l Wrote}:eh yes and no, some of them would be terrible at defense IRregardless of minutes

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:eh yes and no, some of them would be terrible at defense IRregardless of minutes

Defense is effort. Easier to do it if you are playing 33 instead of 40 and if there is a viable threat on the bench to sub for you if you lollygag.

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:eh yes and no, some of them would be terrible at defense IRregardless of minutes

Defense is effort. Easier to do it if you are playing 33 instead of 40 and if there is a viable threat on the bench to sub for you if you lollygag.

I’m not saying it wouldn’t improve with depth, but none of these guards are capable of playing defense.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:eh yes and no, some of them would be terrible at defense IRregardless of minutes

Defense is effort. Easier to do it if you are playing 33 instead of 40 and if there is a viable threat on the bench to sub for you if you lollygag.

I’m not saying it wouldn’t improve with depth, but none of these guards are capable of playing defense.

This is dumb. Any half ass decent athlete is capable of playing defense. BC guards are way above average athletes.