Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:24 pmChatman is on fire
BC923 {l Wrote}:Chatman is on fire
5-for-8 from three point land
EagleOutsider.com
The Largest Independent Community of Boston College Fans and Alumni
http://eagleoutsider.com/phpbb/
Richmond game thread
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:24 pmRe: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:19 pm5-for-8 from three point land
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:38 pmStop taking 3 point shots guys! You are only up by one, you might lose the game.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:38 pmokay now you are behind
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:48 pmLow basketball IQ and remarkably bad coaching from Sister Christian. I can’t tell you how terrible Richmond is this year.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:48 pmovertime
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:49 pmDick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Low basketball IQ and remarkably bad coaching from Sister Christian. I can’t tell you how terrible Richmond is this year.
if they wind up losing this game (right before Christmas break) that is a disaster
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:49 pmOT with Richmond. Brilliant.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 2:50 pmThis should be JC's last game. 
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:07 pmI'll take it a win is a win. But wow that was ugly.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:07 pmDick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:OT with Richmond. Brilliant.
Okay they got lucky in OT, hit their shots. The players can now go home and enjoy their Christmas.
You can't live at the 3-point line in college basketball, you can't. You can't live there at any level actually. Sure, if you go 15-for-26, yeah you are going to beat #1 Duke. If you go 10-for-25 (which is what this team will do much more often) then you have to go to OT to beat fucking Richmond.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:10 pmMattTheEagle {l Wrote}:I'll take it a win is a win. But wow that was ugly.
They took what could have been a real bad loss, and turned it into a very close win. Play like that vs any ACC team, they lose. Maybe it will be a wake-up call?
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 5:59 pminnocentbystander {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:OT with Richmond. Brilliant.
Okay they got lucky in OT, hit their shots. The players can now go home and enjoy their Christmas.
You can't live at the 3-point line in college basketball, you can't. You can't live there at any level actually. Sure, if you go 15-for-26, yeah you are going to beat #1 Duke. If you go 10-for-25 (which is what this team will do much more often) then you have to go to OT to beat fucking Richmond.
Teams basically live at the 3 point line at all levels.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 6:16 pmtwballgame9 {l Wrote}:innocentbystander {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:OT with Richmond. Brilliant.
Okay they got lucky in OT, hit their shots. The players can now go home and enjoy their Christmas.
You can't live at the 3-point line in college basketball, you can't. You can't live there at any level actually. Sure, if you go 15-for-26, yeah you are going to beat #1 Duke. If you go 10-for-25 (which is what this team will do much more often) then you have to go to OT to beat fucking Richmond.
Teams basically live at the 3 point line at all levels.
I don't think we are communicating. Yes, all teams need to be able to shoot some threes.
When I say, don't live at the three point line, what I mean is that you can't count on having three point shots be the primary focus of our offensive strategy. You can't begin the game and count on 45 points from the three point line, every game. If you have a clear, unimpeded shot, you can't pass to anyone on the inside at the basket, and time is running out, take the shot. No problem. If your team is taking 25 to 30 three-point shots a game because you can NEVER get to the hoop, no one is ever open for a normal shot, and you are shooting in close coverage and desparation, then no, that sucks. That is not a viable offensive strategy. You are going lose way more than you will win. Stephen Curry is awesome, but most basketball players are not that awesome particularly in college.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 7:16 pm13 posts in this thread and 8 of them belong to nospace. for this alone jimmy Mac should be fired
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:01 pmPredictable let down game. All that counts is the W.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 2:48 amIt's so weird that this question just randomly popped into my head, but just out of curiosity, are there still people here who have the power to change other people's posts?
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:21 amWake beat Richmond by 30
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:21 amManny {l Wrote}:It's so weird that this question just randomly popped into my head, but just out of curiosity, are there still people here who have the power to change other people's posts?
yes, and I like weeners.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 10:54 aminnocentbystander {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:innocentbystander {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:OT with Richmond. Brilliant.
Okay they got lucky in OT, hit their shots. The players can now go home and enjoy their Christmas.
You can't live at the 3-point line in college basketball, you can't. You can't live there at any level actually. Sure, if you go 15-for-26, yeah you are going to beat #1 Duke. If you go 10-for-25 (which is what this team will do much more often) then you have to go to OT to beat fucking Richmond.
Teams basically live at the 3 point line at all levels.
I don't think we are communicating. Yes, all teams need to be able to shoot some threes.
When I say, don't live at the three point line, what I mean is that you can't count on having three point shots be the primary focus of our offensive strategy. You can't begin the game and count on 45 points from the three point line, every game. If you have a clear, unimpeded shot, you can't pass to anyone on the inside at the basket, and time is running out, take the shot. No problem. If your team is taking 25 to 30 three-point shots a game because you can NEVER get to the hoop, no one is ever open for a normal shot, and you are shooting in close coverage and desparation, then no, that sucks. That is not a viable offensive strategy. You are going lose way more than you will win. Stephen Curry is awesome, but most basketball players are not that awesome particularly in college.
Golden State
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2017 8:30 pm2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Wake beat Richmond by 30
Because the transitive property always works
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 10:22 pmRichmond is a bad team picked to be in the bottom half of the A10–unlike the Nonnies who just beat Syracuse in the dome despite going 15 minutes without scoring a point in the second half. What do you think about that Epstein?
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:36 pmRichmond is so bad that Ewing kept them on the schedule.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 7:23 ameepstein0 {l Wrote}:2001Eagle {l Wrote}:Wake beat Richmond by 30
Because the transitive property always works
For kissing dicks? Abolsutely
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:23 amDick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Richmond is a bad team picked to be in the bottom half of the A10–unlike the Nonnies who just beat Syracuse in the dome despite going 15 minutes without scoring a point in the second half. What do you think about that Epstein?
I couldn’t care less. It’s a win.
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 9:19 ameepstein0 {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Richmond is a bad team picked to be in the bottom half of the A10–unlike the Nonnies who just beat Syracuse in the dome despite going 15 minutes without scoring a point in the second half. What do you think about that Epstein?
I couldn’t care less. It’s a win.
Could
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2017 9:31 ambcfan85 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Richmond is a bad team picked to be in the bottom half of the A10–unlike the Nonnies who just beat Syracuse in the dome despite going 15 minutes without scoring a point in the second half. What do you think about that Epstein?
I couldn’t care less. It’s a win.
Could
Re: Richmond game thread
Posted: Fri Dec 29, 2017 4:27 pmbcfan85 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Dick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Richmond is a bad team picked to be in the bottom half of the A10–unlike the Nonnies who just beat Syracuse in the dome despite going 15 minutes without scoring a point in the second half. What do you think about that Epstein?
I couldn’t care less. It’s a win.
Could
Fuckin' hoops weirdos