EagleOutsider.com

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:People will laugh at this, but I think BC can win this game

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:People will laugh at this, but I think BC can win this game

Depends on how well they handle pressure. I'm not optimistic, but if they handle the rock, they will get a ton of easy buckets.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:21 plus 301. Lol

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:21 plus 301. Lol

remember, Higgins worked Hilary. You can believe his number stats

jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:My point was that turnovers, just like the inept passing of the football team, are inherent with this squad. Its silly to expect BC to cut down on their biggest problem when playing much better competition, especially so when the likes of Duke and Louisville have game plans focused on exploiting turnovers.

In sum, saying this team could beat some of the better teams in the country by not turning the ball over is as blatant and as unlikely as it is true. So it's kind of a pointless assertion that you have made countless times. Now for you thinking I said that turnovers weren't a problem, I suggest you re read the original post and stat I provided, which rephrased shows BC has more turnovers than 320 other D1 teams, that's a pretty big problem, just click on the link.

No 25 & 12 revisionist history or alternative facts here, I suggest you go elsewhere with your jiggery-pokery.

jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:My point was that turnovers, just like the inept passing of the football team, are inherent with this squad. Its silly to expect BC to cut down on their biggest problem when playing much better competition, especially so when the likes of Duke and Louisville have game plans focused on exploiting turnovers.

In sum, saying this team could beat some of the better teams in the country by not turning the ball over is as blatant and as unlikely as it is true. So it's kind of a pointless assertion that you have made countless times. Now for you thinking I said that turnovers weren't a problem, I suggest you re read the original post and stat I provided, which rephrased shows BC has more turnovers than 320 other D1 teams, that's a pretty big problem, just click on the link.

No 25 & 12 revisionist history or alternative facts here, I suggest you go elsewhere with your jiggery-pokery.

This was a terrible effort to explain away your post. You've mastered unwarranted condescension though, kudos.

Your no turnover premise is really dumb and that needed to be pointed out since you continually bring it up. 'If the football team had an amazing offensive line the past two years, they would have scored a lot more points and likely won a lot more games." Thanks for your insight?

jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Result is irrelevant but my wife and I have no clue what is a foul anymore after this officiating display.

I thought you would appreciate the uncalled mugging of Bowman when he drove to the hoop in the second half.

Also, Louisville is probably one of the worst ACC match-ups for this team, a blowout was pretty inevitable

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:We are not the first team Louisville has done that to. That is a final four team if those big guys are gong to hit jump shots like that.