ILikeBC {l Wrote}:I posted this on EA and think it merits discussion here:
The hiring of Christian is one of those questions like "should a team have gotten in the NCAA tournament" vs. "how will the team do in the tournament." AKA, sometimes it is largely agreed upon the last at large team in the tournament should not have received a bid, but the bid should have gone in favor of another team. However, that last at large team ends up making a sweet 16 run.
Jim Christian is that last at large team. Should he have been hired? Absolutely not. But can he succeed here? Jury is out. We have some young talent and who knows what they can be after 3-4 years.
This is a year where we have no remaining Donahue trash on the team (except for Garland). Lets see what we can do.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests