Page 2 of 3

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:43 am
by jbrooks58
If BC could get the production they got from Owens and Turner yesterday, as well as get rid of Carter and have Hicks and Robinson back they'd actually be competitive. :titanic

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 1:40 pm
by DavidGordonsFoot
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:For the record, I think banning eepstein was stupid.

why? what did we really miss? go read the cuse game thread and imagine those comments applied to yesterday's game.

These types of bannings are not in the spirit of this board. I think eepstein is overreaching in a lot of his analysis but what he is doing is not on the same level as roonie and the guy from Texas.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:09 pm
by eagle9903
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:For the record, I think banning eepstein was stupid.

why? what did we really miss? go read the cuse game thread and imagine those comments applied to yesterday's game.

These types of bannings are not in the spirit of this board. I think eepstein is overreaching in a lot of his analysis but what he is doing is not on the same level as roonie and the guy from Texas.


Counterpoint, banning people is funny sometimes, especially when it is for short periods.

Eepstein has micropenis; ergo it is ok to ban him temporarily.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:11 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:For the record, I think banning eepstein was stupid.

why? what did we really miss? go read the cuse game thread and imagine those comments applied to yesterday's game.

These types of bannings are not in the spirit of this board. I think eepstein is overreaching in a lot of his analysis but what he is doing is not on the same level as roonie and the guy from Texas.


Counterpoint, banning people is funny sometimes, especially when it is for short periods.

Eepstein has micropenis; ergo it is ok to ban him temporarily.

this

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 3:17 pm
by angrychicken
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:For the record, I think banning eepstein was stupid.

why? what did we really miss? go read the cuse game thread and imagine those comments applied to yesterday's game.

These types of bannings are not in the spirit of this board. I think eepstein is overreaching in a lot of his analysis but what he is doing is not on the same level as roonie and the guy from Texas.


Counterpoint, banning people is funny sometimes, especially when it is for short periods.

Eepstein has micropenis; ergo it is ok to ban him temporarily.

this

I'd like to go on the record as someone who misses bani.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:27 am
by eagle9903
ban jhiggi and unban eepstein.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:02 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:ban jhiggi and unban eepstein.

eepstein was banned for a day. he is no longer banned and hasn't been for about a day

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:03 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:For the record, I think banning eepstein was stupid.

why? what did we really miss? go read the cuse game thread and imagine those comments applied to yesterday's game.

These types of bannings are not in the spirit of this board. I think eepstein is overreaching in a lot of his analysis but what he is doing is not on the same level as roonie and the guy from Texas.


Counterpoint, banning people is funny sometimes, especially when it is for short periods.

Eepstein has micropenis; ergo it is ok to ban him temporarily.

this


You are a moron. Banning Eppy just confirms this. Only posting again because I had to weigh in on this. Have fun with your shitty board, Brad Bates and pricksix, you idiot.

there is not a doubt in my mind you will post to this board again.

but, maybe we lucked out and eepstein really won't come back. dare to dream...

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:27 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
so now you've moved from stealing angry dick's shtick to stealing my fake quit shtick? wonderful

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:33 am
by Corporal Funishment
Or maybe we could just stop banning people altogether for the crime of "having annoyed Tobacco while he was on his period"

Outside of Roonie's new message spamming, the most ban-worthy behavior I've seen on this board is Tobacco's posting of penis images directly into threads

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:42 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
eepstein was banned on saturday for talking tough about how shitty bc was but not backing it up when pressed.

the last banning prior to that was the result of the worst poster contest where the stated "prize" was a one week banning.

the last banning prior to that was the bots from the bot invasion.

where is "all the banning" that you are bitching about, glacier? seriously, you're going to accuse me of being on my period all the while you are creating some imaginary volume of injustices that clearly boil your blood and had direct impact on your enjoyment of our less than stellar performance in chapel hill on saturday? you're really something else but i guess i need to tend to your feelings and provide you with this admission survey required before you can enter the safe space you so clearly need...

Image

and maybe some of this to keep down the swelling:

Image

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:35 am
by DavidGordonsFoot
Glacier is my favorite nickname going right now.

Wht does higgi have a hair across his ass for pedro?

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:39 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:Glacier is my favorite nickname going right now.

Wht does higgi have a hair across his ass for pedro?

that stems back from when jhiggi first burst on the scene. prick6 and higgi used to slapfight about anything and everything. if this place wasn't a broken down 72 pinto you could use the search function to find examples

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:17 pm
by eagle9903
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Or maybe we could just stop banning people altogether for the crime of "having annoyed Tobacco while he was on his period"

Outside of Roonie's new message spamming, the most ban-worthy behavior I've seen on this board is Tobacco's posting of penis images directly into threads


You don't get a vote because you are a terrible poster.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 1:44 pm
by angrychicken
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:Or maybe we could just stop banning people altogether for the crime of "having annoyed Tobacco while he was on his period"

Outside of Roonie's new message spamming, the most ban-worthy behavior I've seen on this board is Tobacco's posting of penis images directly into threads


You don't get a vote because you are a terrible poster.

Oral fun isn't a terrible poster. He just gets outraged easily, which is terrible. He's also a poster.

You see, Oswald, this is the classic situation of "who put their peanut butters in my chocolates/who put their chocolates in my peanut butters". When all the dust settles, we'll all have a good laugh while bathing in each other's chocolates. Easy peezy.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 2:46 pm
by eepstein0
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eepstein was banned on saturday for talking tough about how shitty bc was but not backing it up when pressed.

the last banning prior to that was the result of the worst poster contest where the stated "prize" was a one week banning.

the last banning prior to that was the bots from the bot invasion.

where is "all the banning" that you are bitching about, glacier? seriously, you're going to accuse me of being on my period all the while you are creating some imaginary volume of injustices that clearly boil your blood and had direct impact on your enjoyment of our less than stellar performance in chapel hill on saturday? you're really something else but i guess i need to tend to your feelings and provide you with this admission survey required before you can enter the safe space you so clearly need...

Image

and maybe some of this to keep down the swelling:

Image


I'm only coming back to point out that you are lying to everyone on this board again. This is the 3rd time I've been banned within a month. Whether it was you or one of you minions it doesn't really matter. Have the screenshots to show it.

You realize if you scare of jhiggi, myself and a few people in the EO Section you and your minions are going to be posting messages to each other right? Because everyone else will be gone

Short of an apology you can have your stupid message board where you randomly ban people for doing nothing wrong. This place use to be fun and free, clearly not anymore it's exactly like the old board which all of us left for the exact things you're doing now.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 2:58 pm
by twballgame9
I am down to my last tissue and I am not certain who needs it more.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 3:26 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eepstein was banned on saturday for talking tough about how shitty bc was but not backing it up when pressed.

the last banning prior to that was the result of the worst poster contest where the stated "prize" was a one week banning.

the last banning prior to that was the bots from the bot invasion.

where is "all the banning" that you are bitching about, glacier? seriously, you're going to accuse me of being on my period all the while you are creating some imaginary volume of injustices that clearly boil your blood and had direct impact on your enjoyment of our less than stellar performance in chapel hill on saturday? you're really something else but i guess i need to tend to your feelings and provide you with this admission survey required before you can enter the safe space you so clearly need...

Image

and maybe some of this to keep down the swelling:

Image


I'm only coming back to point out that you are lying to everyone on this board again. This is the 3rd time I've been banned within a month. Whether it was you or one of you minions it doesn't really matter. Have the screenshots to show it.

You realize if you scare of jhiggi, myself and a few people in the EO Section you and your minions are going to be posting messages to each other right? Because everyone else will be gone

Short of an apology you can have your stupid message board where you randomly ban people for doing nothing wrong. This place use to be fun and free, clearly not anymore it's exactly like the old board which all of us left for the exact things you're doing now.

i am sorry that i find your repetitive complaints about the team not having enough talent to be tiresome.

please, please don't leave. i don't know how we could possibly survive without you pointing out that untalented 4s and 5s will get their asses handed to them in the acc. please continue these in depth insights that are not at all obvious and as great to read the 100th time in a day as they were the first time 100 days ago.

when i look at the moderator logs i see you were banned yesterday (by me) and you were banned for finishing in 2nd in the worst poster bracket (by someone else). i'll accept your claimed 3rd banning as typical wesleyan exaggeration. considering that you've "quit" on this team (football and/or basketball) at least a dozen times, i truly wonder why you're still here.

i look forward to your microdickian reascent into the world of pointing out how terrible the basketball team is in the remaining 2 days leading up to the uva game.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 3:27 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
ps - try some of oral fun's cream. it may help ease some of your pains

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:29 pm
by twballgame9
In fairness, TRE, if tiresome complaining about shitty college sports programs were a threshold for banishment, there would be no left here to do the banishing.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:30 pm
by twballgame9
That said, random and temporary banning (1) can be funny, (b) has happened to me many times to my merriment, and (iii) is no reason to be butt hurt as bad as epstein just was.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 4:38 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
true and true.

well said, tedwardo. next time i'm ready to ban you, i'll give you a pass.

and the suggestion that jhiggi pack up his shtickmobile during an election year is more laughable than the suggestion that dgf might die by suffocating on vaginia

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:17 pm
by h2o
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:true and true.

well said, tedwardo. next time i'm ready to ban you, i'll give you a pass.

and the suggestion that jhiggi pack up his shtickmobile during an election year is more laughable than the suggestion that dgf might die by suffocating on vaginia


stfu you drama queen and get the search function working.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:28 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
h2o {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:true and true.

well said, tedwardo. next time i'm ready to ban you, i'll give you a pass.

and the suggestion that jhiggi pack up his shtickmobile during an election year is more laughable than the suggestion that dgf might die by suffocating on vaginia


stfu you drama queen and get the search function working.

at your age i can safely say that the search function will not be fixed in your lifetime

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:38 pm
by h2o
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
h2o {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:true and true.

well said, tedwardo. next time i'm ready to ban you, i'll give you a pass.

and the suggestion that jhiggi pack up his shtickmobile during an election year is more laughable than the suggestion that dgf might die by suffocating on vaginia


stfu you drama queen and get the search function working.

at your age i can safely say that the search function will not be fixed in your lifetime


that goes without saying. this site has one foot in the grave and will most likely be dead in a year or so. Unless the six of you get fed up with each other before that.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:03 pm
by 2001Eagle
Twitter says the only bc press at the unc game was eagle action. No Boston newspapers.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 11:35 pm
by jbrooks58
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eepstein was banned on saturday for talking tough about how shitty bc was but not backing it up when pressed.

the last banning prior to that was the result of the worst poster contest where the stated "prize" was a one week banning.

the last banning prior to that was the bots from the bot invasion.

where is "all the banning" that you are bitching about, glacier? seriously, you're going to accuse me of being on my period all the while you are creating some imaginary volume of injustices that clearly boil your blood and had direct impact on your enjoyment of our less than stellar performance in chapel hill on saturday? you're really something else but i guess i need to tend to your feelings and provide you with this admission survey required before you can enter the safe space you so clearly need...

Image

and maybe some of this to keep down the swelling:

Image


I'm only coming back to point out that you are lying to everyone on this board again. This is the 3rd time I've been banned within a month. Whether it was you or one of you minions it doesn't really matter. Have the screenshots to show it.

You realize if you scare of jhiggi, myself and a few people in the EO Section you and your minions are going to be posting messages to each other right? Because everyone else will be gone

Short of an apology you can have your stupid message board where you randomly ban people for doing nothing wrong. This place use to be fun and free, clearly not anymore it's exactly like the old board which all of us left for the exact things you're doing now.

i am sorry that i find your repetitive complaints about the team not having enough talent to be tiresome.

please, please don't leave. i don't know how we could possibly survive without you pointing out that untalented 4s and 5s will get their asses handed to them in the acc. please continue these in depth insights that are not at all obvious and as great to read the 100th time in a day as they were the first time 100 days ago.

when i look at the moderator logs i see you were banned yesterday (by me) and you were banned for finishing in 2nd in the worst poster bracket (by someone else). i'll accept your claimed 3rd banning as typical wesleyan exaggeration. considering that you've "quit" on this team (football and/or basketball) at least a dozen times, i truly wonder why you're still here.

i look forward to your microdickian reascent into the world of pointing out how terrible the basketball team is in the remaining 2 days leading up to the uva game.

TRE,
We understand that eepsteins complaining can get old, but without him most of these threads would have little to no conversation. Frankly, I enjoy talking to other fans of BC and would appreciate if you didn't run them off just because you get annoyed. Thank you.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 12:45 am
by lobstalova
jbrooks58 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eepstein was banned on saturday for talking tough about how shitty bc was but not backing it up when pressed.

the last banning prior to that was the result of the worst poster contest where the stated "prize" was a one week banning.

the last banning prior to that was the bots from the bot invasion.

where is "all the banning" that you are bitching about, glacier? seriously, you're going to accuse me of being on my period all the while you are creating some imaginary volume of injustices that clearly boil your blood and had direct impact on your enjoyment of our less than stellar performance in chapel hill on saturday? you're really something else but i guess i need to tend to your feelings and provide you with this admission survey required before you can enter the safe space you so clearly need...

Image

and maybe some of this to keep down the swelling:

Image


I'm only coming back to point out that you are lying to everyone on this board again. This is the 3rd time I've been banned within a month. Whether it was you or one of you minions it doesn't really matter. Have the screenshots to show it.

You realize if you scare of jhiggi, myself and a few people in the EO Section you and your minions are going to be posting messages to each other right? Because everyone else will be gone

Short of an apology you can have your stupid message board where you randomly ban people for doing nothing wrong. This place use to be fun and free, clearly not anymore it's exactly like the old board which all of us left for the exact things you're doing now.

i am sorry that i find your repetitive complaints about the team not having enough talent to be tiresome.

please, please don't leave. i don't know how we could possibly survive without you pointing out that untalented 4s and 5s will get their asses handed to them in the acc. please continue these in depth insights that are not at all obvious and as great to read the 100th time in a day as they were the first time 100 days ago.

when i look at the moderator logs i see you were banned yesterday (by me) and you were banned for finishing in 2nd in the worst poster bracket (by someone else). i'll accept your claimed 3rd banning as typical wesleyan exaggeration. considering that you've "quit" on this team (football and/or basketball) at least a dozen times, i truly wonder why you're still here.

i look forward to your microdickian reascent into the world of pointing out how terrible the basketball team is in the remaining 2 days leading up to the uva game.

TRE,
We understand that eepsteins complaining can get old, but without him most of these threads would have little to no conversation. Frankly, I enjoy talking to other fans of BC and would appreciate if you didn't run them off just because you get annoyed. Thank you.


agreed and I loathe eepstein's comments.

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 9:30 am
by 2014 Eagle
Back to basketball talk- clearly the only reason why UNC lost last night was because they had to grind out the win over us on Saturday, so let's just take credit for that L'ville win last night! :angrychicken :angrychicken :angrychicken

Re: UNC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:04 pm
by claver2010
Roy Williams is an atrocious in game coach version: 34665422245