TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
and people shrugged when i nominated him for the asshat.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
and people shrugged when i nominated him for the asshat.
since asshat has turned into a prestigious distinction, i think our shrugging was well founded
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
and people shrugged when i nominated him for the asshat.
since asshat has turned into a prestigious distinction, i think our shrugging was well founded
claver2010 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
and people shrugged when i nominated him for the asshat.
since asshat has turned into a prestigious distinction, i think our shrugging was well founded
agreed, if he wins asshat this place has gone down further than the grandpierre suggested
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
and people shrugged when i nominated him for the asshat.
since asshat has turned into a prestigious distinction, i think our shrugging was well founded
agreed, if he wins asshat this place has gone down further than the grandpierre suggested
i really think i'm going to term it as "worst poster" and get back to the days where a nomination made the pussy posters quit. remember when nick quit because he was nominated for the 1st annual asshat contest? i do.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
and people shrugged when i nominated him for the asshat.
since asshat has turned into a prestigious distinction, i think our shrugging was well founded
agreed, if he wins asshat this place has gone down further than the grandpierre suggested
i really think i'm going to term it as "worst poster" and get back to the days where a nomination made the pussy posters quit. remember when nick quit because he was nominated for the 1st annual asshat contest? i do.
I nominated him with the understanding that asshat meant "worst poster." This was before snark and jackassery took over the election and thte original intent was lost.
I still laugh about NickedIn.
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:I like the worst poster idea (unsurprisingly, since I suggested it...) and I think it would be useful if in either the nominee stage or the voting stage you had to go back through the user's posts and find an example of something really obnoxious or dumb they said during the year. This would also cut down on the blatant alias abuse which took a lot of the fun out of the contest, says this observer. It would also bring back "great" memories of the year gone by.
Boston College 8 {l Wrote}:bump
StratEagle {l Wrote}:Boston College 8 {l Wrote}:bump
You realize that bumping a post already at the top of the list doesn't do anything right?
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:so first you bumped it and then one minute later you posted your proposed roster?
you're a weirdo (yeah, that's right - not a w3ird0z, a weirdo)
lobstalova {l Wrote}:I think SBT at the 2 is entirely possible.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I think Carter/Milon/Turner starting is a north of 90% proposition. The 4 and the 5 is where the questions arise. I don't think any of the candidates are clear cut - maybe Clifford, which is unfortunate.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:I have some hope that Clifford with a full year in the gym, some better coaching and a real PF playing next to him will look better. He played acceptable in the Puerto Rico Tournament but when he had to play 30 minutes a game things went downhill fast.
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:Clifford is great.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:lobstalova {l Wrote}:I think SBT at the 2 is entirely possible.
Nope.
Carter, Milon, Turner, TBD, Diallo.
SBT is going to have the fill it up role off the bench. For offense and not having both our centers commit two fouls in the first three minutes, it makes no sense to play Clifford and Diallo together.
That euro kid grew, I could see him starting at the 4 if he is strong enough
lobstalova {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:lobstalova {l Wrote}:I think SBT at the 2 is entirely possible.
Nope.
Carter, Milon, Turner, TBD, Diallo.
SBT is going to have the fill it up role off the bench. For offense and not having both our centers commit two fouls in the first three minutes, it makes no sense to play Clifford and Diallo together.
That euro kid grew, I could see him starting at the 4 if he is strong enough
Ok so just not even possible...
Why are we still so high on Clifford?! Makes no sense.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:Clifford is great.
if he can get to 100%.
question: who's better, clifford at 100% or donahue year 1?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests