Hanlan

by **eepstein0** on Wed Apr 15, 2015 4:31 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:The fact that I have to convince anyone that the presence of Olivier Hanlan does not an NIT team make is simply, well, we've seen three years of that shit already.

He's not remotely in the category of "great BC players" let alone "great college basketball players"

BC would have been a fringe NIT team this year if you replace Clifford and the other inside players with some athletic bigs. So many games they would have won if they didn't get killed on the glass

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Wed Apr 15, 2015 6:11 pm

NJM89 {l Wrote}:Officially going to NBA according to bceagles.com

agent or no agent?

THIS IS IMPORTANT!!!

by **Onyx Blackman** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:42 am

Can Hanlan declare a redshirt and come back in 2016 if he doesn't like living in Istanbul?

by **b0mberMan** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:49 pm

Onyx Blackman {l Wrote}:Can Hanlan declare a redshirt and come back in 2016 if he doesn't like living in Istanbul?

I think he can play right away, so long as Turkey offers a graduate degree that BC doesn't

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:06 pm

I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

by **Corporal Funishment** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:30 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

It's bloody meaningless since there's no control to the experiment at all given the entire roster is going to be completely different next year, not to mention that even if they win 2 games all year you will say Hanlan wouldn't have made it better anyway. Unless you've constructed a parallel universe where Hanlan stays and we can compare results, in which case I'd like to buy your parallel universe constructing machine.

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:33 pm

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

It's bloody meaningless since there's no control to the experiment at all given the entire roster is going to be completely different next year, not to mention that even if they win 2 games all year you will say Hanlan wouldn't have made it better anyway. Unless you've constructed a parallel universe where Hanlan stays and we can compare results, in which case I'd like to buy your parallel universe constructing machine.

so with 3 freshmen starters we should all assume that dook will suck in 2014/2015 because the entire roster will be completely different than it was the year before.

by **Corporal Funishment** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:37 pm

I'm saying that there are factors which will affect the number of games that we win next year relative to last year outside of Hanlan's decision to leave. This is not a difficult concept.

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:46 pm

Again, to clarify for you tards, I just said Hanlan would make the team better by three games, not that he would have no impact. Pony up, w3ird0z

by **Corporal Funishment** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:53 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Again, to clarify for you tards, I just said Hanlan would make the team better by three games, not that he would have no impact. Pony up, w3ird0z

And at the end of the year, what formula do we use to calculate how many games we would have won with Hanlan, to verify whose guess was most accurate?

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:59 pm

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Again, to clarify for you tards, I just said Hanlan would make the team better by three games, not that he would have no impact. Pony up, w3ird0z

And at the end of the year, what formula do we use to calculate how many games we would have won with Hanlan, to verify whose guess was most accurate?

That is not the point of this endeavor. Pony up.

by **Corporal Funishment** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:06 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Again, to clarify for you tards, I just said Hanlan would make the team better by three games, not that he would have no impact. Pony up, w3ird0z

And at the end of the year, what formula do we use to calculate how many games we would have won with Hanlan, to verify whose guess was most accurate?

That is not the point of this endeavor. Pony up.

This makes no sense. You want me to pony up a totally unverifiable number? Fine, 27 wins. Prove me wrong! 8-)

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:08 pm

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Again, to clarify for you tards, I just said Hanlan would make the team better by three games, not that he would have no impact. Pony up, w3ird0z

And at the end of the year, what formula do we use to calculate how many games we would have won with Hanlan, to verify whose guess was most accurate?

That is not the point of this endeavor. Pony up.

This makes no sense. You want me to pony up a totally unverifiable number? Fine, 27 wins. Prove me wrong!

If it is unverifiable, how come you clowns keep citing it?

by **eepstein0** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:12 pm

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Again, to clarify for you tards, I just said Hanlan would make the team better by three games, not that he would have no impact. Pony up, w3ird0z

And at the end of the year, what formula do we use to calculate how many games we would have won with Hanlan, to verify whose guess was most accurate?

That is not the point of this endeavor. Pony up.

This makes no sense. You want me to pony up a totally unverifiable number? Fine, 27 wins. Prove me wrong!

I agree with CP, this is one of the dumber debates we've had on EO. You can't prove it one way or another

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:27 pm

I agree that saying Hanlan is worth a ton of wins is one of the dumber things ever on EO.

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:30 pm

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:They would have been a fringe NIT team, maybe as good as a bubble team with Hanlan and a 5th year.

10 wins is going to be an achievement without him. It's nice BC is finally getting some athletic bigs. Unfortunately, they have no clue what they're doing on offense. Next year is going to be Donahue Year 2. 30 and 40 point losses, putrid offense, etc. it at least would've been fun with Hanlan, it is going to blow without him. I think the staff is doing a great job recruiting, but this isn't Kentucky, and they're not going to be awesome as freshman.

TWB is right in that next year was a throw away either way, but to say they won't be significantly worse is insane.

Unverifiable!

by **Corporal Funishment** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:56 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:They would have been a fringe NIT team, maybe as good as a bubble team with Hanlan and a 5th year.

10 wins is going to be an achievement without him. It's nice BC is finally getting some athletic bigs. Unfortunately, they have no clue what they're doing on offense. Next year is going to be Donahue Year 2. 30 and 40 point losses, putrid offense, etc. it at least would've been fun with Hanlan, it is going to blow without him. I think the staff is doing a great job recruiting, but this isn't Kentucky, and they're not going to be awesome as freshman.

TWB is right in that next year was a throw away either way, but to say they won't be significantly worse is insane.

Unverifiable!

Actually, the number of wins we will get next year without Hanlan is a perfectly verifiable number, barring some sort of season cancellation or changement de cœur from Hanlan.

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:58 pm

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:(1)They would have been a fringe NIT team, maybe as good as a bubble team with Hanlan and a 5th year.

(2) 10 wins is going to be an achievement without him.

Unverifiable!

Actually, the number of wins we will get next year without Hanlan is a perfectly verifiable number, barring some sort of season cancellation or changement de cœur from Hanlan.

What about the difference?

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:52 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:(1)They would have been a fringe NIT team, maybe as good as a bubble team with Hanlan and a 5th year.

(2) 10 wins is going to be an achievement without him.

Unverifiable!

Actually, the number of wins we will get next year without Hanlan is a perfectly verifiable number, barring some sort of season cancellation or changement de cœur from Hanlan.

What about the difference?

i forget the section of calculus where we learned how to multiply by lottery pick. if i remember, it came right after imaginary numbers

by **TontoKowalski** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:47 pm

Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

It's bloody meaningless since there's no control to the experiment at all given the entire roster is going to be completely different next year, not to mention that even if they win 2 games all year you will say Hanlan wouldn't have made it better anyway. Unless you've constructed a parallel universe where Hanlan stays and we can compare results, in which case I'd like to buy your parallel universe constructing machine.

I tried three times with my own parallel universe constructing machine to create a universe where hanlan stayed - here's how it went:

Trial 1: Just as I was about to flip the switch, a Jersey Mike's delivery man driving a weenermobile crashed into the electrical pole in front of my house, knocking out the power to the universe maker.

Trial 2: TRE's animated boobies thread entries crashed the computer I was using as a control system.

Trial 3: A man wearing a Fordham Law t shirt spilled his jamba juice into the vent fan while kissing a man wearing a UConn Law t shirt, shorting out the cooling system.

This string of improbably coincidences lead me to believe that Hanlan staying created a parallel universe that was abhorrent to nature, and so the machine interfered with itself from the future to avoid this condition. You're welcome to try my universe maker, but I'd like to point out, after all my trials, we're still in a universe where Spaz was a football coach for a few years.

by **twballgame9** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:07 pm

TontoKowalski {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

It's bloody meaningless since there's no control to the experiment at all given the entire roster is going to be completely different next year, not to mention that even if they win 2 games all year you will say Hanlan wouldn't have made it better anyway. Unless you've constructed a parallel universe where Hanlan stays and we can compare results, in which case I'd like to buy your parallel universe constructing machine.

I tried three times with my own parallel universe constructing machine to create a universe where hanlan stayed - here's how it went:

Trial 1: Just as I was about to flip the switch, a Jersey Mike's delivery man driving a weenermobile crashed into the electrical pole in front of my house, knocking out the power to the universe maker.

Trial 2: TRE's animated boobies thread entries crashed the computer I was using as a control system.

Trial 3: A man wearing a Fordham Law t shirt spilled his jamba juice into the vent fan while kissing a man wearing a UConn Law t shirt, shorting out the cooling system.

This string of improbably coincidences lead me to believe that Hanlan staying created a parallel universe that was abhorrent to nature, and so the machine interfered with itself from the future to avoid this condition. You're welcome to try my universe maker, but I'd like to point out, after all my trials, we're still in a universe where Spaz was a football coach for a few years.

This is simultaneously awesome and probably too much for the w3ird0z

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Thu Apr 16, 2015 9:04 pm

if tonto won't come back to grace us with his posting more, maybe tonto's wang can help pick up the slack

EDIT - damn, that was tcs.

by **2001Eagle** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:00 am

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TontoKowalski {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

It's bloody meaningless since there's no control to the experiment at all given the entire roster is going to be completely different next year, not to mention that even if they win 2 games all year you will say Hanlan wouldn't have made it better anyway. Unless you've constructed a parallel universe where Hanlan stays and we can compare results, in which case I'd like to buy your parallel universe constructing machine.

I tried three times with my own parallel universe constructing machine to create a universe where hanlan stayed - here's how it went:

Trial 1: Just as I was about to flip the switch, a Jersey Mike's delivery man driving a weenermobile crashed into the electrical pole in front of my house, knocking out the power to the universe maker.

Trial 2: TRE's animated boobies thread entries crashed the computer I was using as a control system.

Trial 3: A man wearing a Fordham Law t shirt spilled his jamba juice into the vent fan while kissing a man wearing a UConn Law t shirt, shorting out the cooling system.

This string of improbably coincidences lead me to believe that Hanlan staying created a parallel universe that was abhorrent to nature, and so the machine interfered with itself from the future to avoid this condition. You're welcome to try my universe maker, but I'd like to point out, after all my trials, we're still in a universe where Spaz was a football coach for a few years.

This is simultaneously awesome and probably too much for the w3ird0z

Hey teddy. Albany called. They want their diploma back because you're too fucking retarded.

I

by **MattTheEagle** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 12:52 am

For those who think fifth year Jordan Daniels wouldn't help the team, please answer me this: Who is playing point guard next year? If you answered true freshman SG Jerome Robinson for 40 minutes, you are only proving my point.

I think he comes if the staff wants him. Right now we need like 5 more players would love to see a mix of a couple freshmen, fifth years, and transfers.

by **NJM89** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 2:45 am

MattTheEagle {l Wrote}:For those who think fifth year Jordan Daniels wouldn't help the team, please answer me this: Who is playing point guard next year? If you answered true freshman SG Jerome Robinson for 40 minutes, you are only proving my point.

I think he comes if the staff wants him. Right now we need like 5 more players would love to see a mix of a couple freshmen, fifth years, and transfers.

I would take back Daniels considering we literally have no pg on the roster. I remember that one win we had in the ACC (was probably our only win?) when he was a freshman against FSU i believe, and he went bonkers and looked good. Sucks that he never grew since he was nationally recognized in his early high school years always had talent. Still dont see Robinson as a true point guard maybe for like 10min tops a game at the point. He really only has Clifford as a connection and im sure most of his friends at the school from the past will be graduating next month. I think he ends up in the WCC with Rahon.

by **twballgame9** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:16 am

2001Eagle {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
TontoKowalski {l Wrote}:
Corporal Funishment {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:I'd like to get everyone's input on what they think the loss of Hanlan means in terms of number of wins. I will say 3. Ready, go.

It's bloody meaningless since there's no control to the experiment at all given the entire roster is going to be completely different next year, not to mention that even if they win 2 games all year you will say Hanlan wouldn't have made it better anyway. Unless you've constructed a parallel universe where Hanlan stays and we can compare results, in which case I'd like to buy your parallel universe constructing machine.

I tried three times with my own parallel universe constructing machine to create a universe where hanlan stayed - here's how it went:

Trial 1: Just as I was about to flip the switch, a Jersey Mike's delivery man driving a weenermobile crashed into the electrical pole in front of my house, knocking out the power to the universe maker.

Trial 2: TRE's animated boobies thread entries crashed the computer I was using as a control system.

Trial 3: A man wearing a Fordham Law t shirt spilled his jamba juice into the vent fan while kissing a man wearing a UConn Law t shirt, shorting out the cooling system.

This string of improbably coincidences lead me to believe that Hanlan staying created a parallel universe that was abhorrent to nature, and so the machine interfered with itself from the future to avoid this condition. You're welcome to try my universe maker, but I'd like to point out, after all my trials, we're still in a universe where Spaz was a football coach for a few years.

This is simultaneously awesome and probably too much for the w3ird0z

Hey teddy. Albany called. They want their diploma back because you're too fucking retarded.

I

Do I have to give back the one with the eagle on it too?

Dance

by **commavegarage** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:21 am

is this conversation still going on?

you guys have made tws entire week less boring

by **twballgame9** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:31 am

commavegarage {l Wrote}:is this conversation still going on?

you guys have made tws entire week less boring

You and HJS just want to ruin shit.

by **commavegarage** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:35 am

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
commavegarage {l Wrote}:is this conversation still going on?

you guys have made tws entire week less boring

You and HJS just want to ruin shit.

i cant help but point and laugh at people sometimes

by **TobaccoRoadEagle** on Fri Apr 17, 2015 11:09 am

in fairness to braylon, this thread was approaching meatbomb territory.

Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Re: Hanlan

Who is online