Page 1 of 4

The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:18 pm
by eagle9903
I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:42 pm
by MilitantEagle
Is it possible to have one of the tyrants confirm why there is a connection being made to Cooley (e.g. his IP address is from Providence)? Or is it just a guess?

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:46 pm
by eagle9903
substantively debate Gloidy, could you do any less?

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 3:33 pm
by MaroonNGold
eagle9903 wrote:I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.


-------------

Agreed.

Tell us what you THINK you know about each subject.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:56 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
MaroonNGold wrote:
eagle9903 wrote:I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.


-------------

Agreed.

Tell us what you THINK you know about each subject.


Bullshit. You asked for debate and you received it. Address each point or find your screen name and ip addresses banned permanently. You have 24 hours

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:27 pm
by MaroonNGold
Sorry, Tobac, but your brand of tyranny don't work here.

You may want to see if you can get some over-the-counter maturity meds.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:20 am
by commavegarage
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:
MaroonNGold wrote:
eagle9903 wrote:I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.


-------------

Agreed.

Tell us what you THINK you know about each subject.


Bullshit. You asked for debate and you received it. Address each point or find your screen name and ip addresses banned permanently. You have 24 hours


did this happen?

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:53 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
MaroonNGold wrote:Sorry, Tobac, but your brand of tyranny don't work here.

You may want to see if you can get some over-the-counter maturity meds.

actually - it works just fine.

for someone touting the maturity card, you're a pretty good candidate for someone that doesn't understand it. you come here day after day with your steven lively level buttshit asking all sort of retadical questions.

someone finally tried to engage you and you pull the elementary school "well i know what those things are but why don't you just tell me what you think to prove that you know what they are"

you have a few days to think about it. i'll tack siriuz's post to make it easier to find when you're allowed back on the playground. you'll have another 24 hours to respond and if you choose not to... the doors will be locked for you forever.

good day(s), sir!

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:46 am
by commavegarage
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:
MaroonNGold wrote:Sorry, Tobac, but your brand of tyranny don't work here.

You may want to see if you can get some over-the-counter maturity meds.

actually - it works just fine.

for someone touting the maturity card, you're a pretty good candidate for someone that doesn't understand it. you come here day after day with your steven lively level buttshit asking all sort of retadical questions.

someone finally tried to engage you and you pull the elementary school "well i know what those things are but why don't you just tell me what you think to prove that you know what they are"

you have a few days to think about it. i'll tack siriuz's post to make it easier to find when you're allowed back on the playground. you'll have another 24 hours to respond and if you choose not to... the doors will be locked for you forever.

good day(s), sir!


thank you.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:51 am
by twballgame9
Is this TRE hissy fit for real? Did we lose an alias?

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:54 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
twballgame9 wrote:Is this TRE hissy fit for real? Did we lose an alias?

just for a couple of days.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:11 am
by twballgame9
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:Is this TRE hissy fit for real? Did we lose an alias?

just for a couple of days.


I support your tyranny.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:27 am
by eagle9903
tyranny by the majority is the best kind of tyranny, unless its against me.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:45 am
by Cadillac90
I'd like to partake in this thread but a lot of it confuses me.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:00 pm
by eagle9903
Cadillac90 wrote:I'd like to partake in this thread but a lot of it confuses me.


'gloidy says that Skinner stinks and Cooley did all the work.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:14 pm
by DavidGordonsFoot
I, for one, have no issue with TRE making sport of Gloidy.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:04 pm
by eagle9903
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:I, for one, have no issue with TRE making sport of Gloidy.


I, for one, hereby waive all my intellectual property rights to MaroonN'Gloid; 'Gloidy and all derivatives thereof.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:14 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
eagle9903 wrote:
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:I, for one, have no issue with TRE making sport of Gloidy.


I, for one, hereby waive all my intellectual property rights to MaroonN'Gloid; 'Gloidy and all derivatives thereof.

waiver denied

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:37 am
by Corporal Funishment
There's an argument to be made for untacking this thread.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:06 am
by TobaccoRoadEagle
Corporal Funishment wrote:There's an argument to be made for untacking this thread.

i'm still hoping he comes back...

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed Dec 24, 2014 1:44 pm
by Corporal Funishment
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:i'm still hoping he comes back...


I bet he does, as soon as we go on a three game losing streak. But it's not like he'll post in this thread anyways. "That ain't the way things work around here, Tobac." :lol:

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:19 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
roonie hasn't been back since he said he wouldn't come back.

i'm untacking this retardathon

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 1:25 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
i'm retacking this retardathon. welcome back, roonie the pussy. if anyone can understand how difficult it is to stay away, i can.

edit - you are still dumb and a pussy

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 2:04 pm
by eagle9903
excellent.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 2:34 pm
by claver2010
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:i'm retacking this retardathon. welcome back, roonie the pussy. if anyone can understand how difficult it is to stay away, i can.

edit - you are still dumb and a pussy


at least he didn't have his posts murt'ered :shrug

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:07 pm
by MaroonNGold
I do hope that none of you fools is a graduate, since your common "response" is insult and personal attack.

Me, well I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells, and i like to kiss my own butt.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2015 3:11 pm
by TobaccoRoadEagle
class of 94, pussy. the year that curley, eisley, huckaby and abram finished their eligibility.

when did you graduate from the heights, mrs. ed cooley

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 11:47 am
by DrJackRyan
Note - even if he never posts again this year, these two posts qualify him for Asshat of the Year, right? He has gotta win this year.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 11:51 am
by twballgame9
I think that's more of a point of order than a note, Roberts

And it is well-taken.

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2015 12:39 pm
by MaroonNGold
TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:class of 94, pussy. the year that curley, eisley, huckaby and abram finished their eligibility.

when did you graduate from the heights, mrs. ed cooley



No way that someone of your myopic debate range is an alum.

The Eagles I know can joust substantively.

But pretend on, deceiving yourself that the current admin did not TWICE destroy BC hoops.

As a result, our program is more like that of the U of Phoenix than it is like the teams against which we were competitive before 2010-11.