The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby eagle9903 on Fri Nov 21, 2014 1:18 pm

I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1723

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby MilitantEagle on Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:42 pm

Is it possible to have one of the tyrants confirm why there is a connection being made to Cooley (e.g. his IP address is from Providence)? Or is it just a guess?
MilitantEagle
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 4:13 pm
Karma: 80

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby eagle9903 on Fri Nov 21, 2014 3:46 pm

substantively debate Gloidy, could you do any less?
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1723

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby MaroonNGold on Sat Nov 22, 2014 3:33 pm

eagle9903 wrote:I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.


-------------

Agreed.

Tell us what you THINK you know about each subject.
BC once attracted stars like Abrams, Adams, Agbai, Austin, Bagley, Barros, Bell, Curley, Driscoll, Dudley, Eisley, Evans, Huckaby, Jackson, McCready, Murphy, O'Brien, Rice, Smith, Williams, et al.

Those days are gone.

And who is responsible for that?
User avatar
MaroonNGold
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:53 pm
Location: St. Ignatius, praying for a leader who'll restore BC's trustworthiness.
Karma: -497

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Sat Nov 22, 2014 11:56 pm

MaroonNGold wrote:
eagle9903 wrote:I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.


-------------

Agreed.

Tell us what you THINK you know about each subject.


Bullshit. You asked for debate and you received it. Address each point or find your screen name and ip addresses banned permanently. You have 24 hours
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby MaroonNGold on Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:27 pm

Sorry, Tobac, but your brand of tyranny don't work here.

You may want to see if you can get some over-the-counter maturity meds.
BC once attracted stars like Abrams, Adams, Agbai, Austin, Bagley, Barros, Bell, Curley, Driscoll, Dudley, Eisley, Evans, Huckaby, Jackson, McCready, Murphy, O'Brien, Rice, Smith, Williams, et al.

Those days are gone.

And who is responsible for that?
User avatar
MaroonNGold
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:53 pm
Location: St. Ignatius, praying for a leader who'll restore BC's trustworthiness.
Karma: -497

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby commavegarage on Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:20 am

TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:
MaroonNGold wrote:
eagle9903 wrote:I have some time to be SIRIUZ this afternoon.

Let's talk about JOB's betrayal of his alma mater, serial firings and generally poor performance as a coach at BC in years not ending in 4 and starting in 199;

Let's talk about Aleksandar Radojevic;

Let's talk about a guy suing two consecutive employers in a row (look out Emerson);

Let's talk about Andre LaFluer, specifically the period that he served as Recruiting Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, 2005-11 and what naming such a person as associate head coach means;

Let's talk about Nate Miles and Josh Nochimson and Ater Majok;

Let's talk about the curious transfer of Josh Fortune;

Let's talk about recruiting morally solid individuals like Brandon Austin; and

Of course why Coach Cooley won't stick up publicly for Al Skinner.


-------------

Agreed.

Tell us what you THINK you know about each subject.


Bullshit. You asked for debate and you received it. Address each point or find your screen name and ip addresses banned permanently. You have 24 hours


did this happen?
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 690

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:53 am

MaroonNGold wrote:Sorry, Tobac, but your brand of tyranny don't work here.

You may want to see if you can get some over-the-counter maturity meds.

actually - it works just fine.

for someone touting the maturity card, you're a pretty good candidate for someone that doesn't understand it. you come here day after day with your steven lively level buttshit asking all sort of retadical questions.

someone finally tried to engage you and you pull the elementary school "well i know what those things are but why don't you just tell me what you think to prove that you know what they are"

you have a few days to think about it. i'll tack siriuz's post to make it easier to find when you're allowed back on the playground. you'll have another 24 hours to respond and if you choose not to... the doors will be locked for you forever.

good day(s), sir!
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby commavegarage on Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:46 am

TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:
MaroonNGold wrote:Sorry, Tobac, but your brand of tyranny don't work here.

You may want to see if you can get some over-the-counter maturity meds.

actually - it works just fine.

for someone touting the maturity card, you're a pretty good candidate for someone that doesn't understand it. you come here day after day with your steven lively level buttshit asking all sort of retadical questions.

someone finally tried to engage you and you pull the elementary school "well i know what those things are but why don't you just tell me what you think to prove that you know what they are"

you have a few days to think about it. i'll tack siriuz's post to make it easier to find when you're allowed back on the playground. you'll have another 24 hours to respond and if you choose not to... the doors will be locked for you forever.

good day(s), sir!


thank you.
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 690

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby twballgame9 on Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:51 am

Is this TRE hissy fit for real? Did we lose an alias?
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 29238
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2340

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Mon Nov 24, 2014 10:54 am

twballgame9 wrote:Is this TRE hissy fit for real? Did we lose an alias?

just for a couple of days.
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby twballgame9 on Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:11 am

TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:Is this TRE hissy fit for real? Did we lose an alias?

just for a couple of days.


I support your tyranny.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 29238
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2340

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby eagle9903 on Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:27 am

tyranny by the majority is the best kind of tyranny, unless its against me.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1723

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby Cadillac90 on Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:45 am

I'd like to partake in this thread but a lot of it confuses me.
Cadillac90
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 1:51 pm
Karma: 195

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby eagle9903 on Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:00 pm

Cadillac90 wrote:I'd like to partake in this thread but a lot of it confuses me.


'gloidy says that Skinner stinks and Cooley did all the work.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1723

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby DavidGordonsFoot on Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:14 pm

I, for one, have no issue with TRE making sport of Gloidy.
#FireJimChristian
#FireAddazio
User avatar
DavidGordonsFoot
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14436
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:56 pm
Location: Not tobaccoroad
Karma: 2856

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby eagle9903 on Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:04 pm

DavidGordonsFoot wrote:I, for one, have no issue with TRE making sport of Gloidy.


I, for one, hereby waive all my intellectual property rights to MaroonN'Gloid; 'Gloidy and all derivatives thereof.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1723

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:14 pm

eagle9903 wrote:
DavidGordonsFoot wrote:I, for one, have no issue with TRE making sport of Gloidy.


I, for one, hereby waive all my intellectual property rights to MaroonN'Gloid; 'Gloidy and all derivatives thereof.

waiver denied
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby Corporal Funishment on Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:37 am

There's an argument to be made for untacking this thread.
I look forward to being called stupid for expressing the above thought.
User avatar
Corporal Funishment
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1809
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:10 pm
Karma: -521

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:06 am

Corporal Funishment wrote:There's an argument to be made for untacking this thread.

i'm still hoping he comes back...
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby Corporal Funishment on Wed Dec 24, 2014 1:44 pm

TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:i'm still hoping he comes back...


I bet he does, as soon as we go on a three game losing streak. But it's not like he'll post in this thread anyways. "That ain't the way things work around here, Tobac." :lol:
I look forward to being called stupid for expressing the above thought.
User avatar
Corporal Funishment
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1809
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:10 pm
Karma: -521

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:19 pm

roonie hasn't been back since he said he wouldn't come back.

i'm untacking this retardathon
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Wed May 20, 2015 1:25 pm

i'm retacking this retardathon. welcome back, roonie the pussy. if anyone can understand how difficult it is to stay away, i can.

edit - you are still dumb and a pussy
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby eagle9903 on Wed May 20, 2015 2:04 pm

excellent.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14256
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1723

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby claver2010 on Wed May 20, 2015 2:34 pm

TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:i'm retacking this retardathon. welcome back, roonie the pussy. if anyone can understand how difficult it is to stay away, i can.

edit - you are still dumb and a pussy


at least he didn't have his posts murt'ered :shrug
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 16817
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 2927

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby MaroonNGold on Wed May 20, 2015 3:07 pm

I do hope that none of you fools is a graduate, since your common "response" is insult and personal attack.

Me, well I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells, and i like to kiss my own butt.
BC once attracted stars like Abrams, Adams, Agbai, Austin, Bagley, Barros, Bell, Curley, Driscoll, Dudley, Eisley, Evans, Huckaby, Jackson, McCready, Murphy, O'Brien, Rice, Smith, Williams, et al.

Those days are gone.

And who is responsible for that?
User avatar
MaroonNGold
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:53 pm
Location: St. Ignatius, praying for a leader who'll restore BC's trustworthiness.
Karma: -497

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby TobaccoRoadEagle on Wed May 20, 2015 3:11 pm

class of 94, pussy. the year that curley, eisley, huckaby and abram finished their eligibility.

when did you graduate from the heights, mrs. ed cooley
Image
User avatar
TobaccoRoadEagle
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 19902
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:51 am
Location: tobaccoroad
Karma: 5579

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby DrJackRyan on Thu May 21, 2015 11:47 am

Note - even if he never posts again this year, these two posts qualify him for Asshat of the Year, right? He has gotta win this year.
User avatar
DrJackRyan
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1128
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:23 pm
Location: Marblehood, Marblehood...always up to no good
Karma: 237

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby twballgame9 on Thu May 21, 2015 11:51 am

I think that's more of a point of order than a note, Roberts

And it is well-taken.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 29238
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2340

Re: The Thread to Substantively Debate 'Gloidy

Postby MaroonNGold on Thu May 21, 2015 12:39 pm

TobaccoRoadEagle wrote:class of 94, pussy. the year that curley, eisley, huckaby and abram finished their eligibility.

when did you graduate from the heights, mrs. ed cooley



No way that someone of your myopic debate range is an alum.

The Eagles I know can joust substantively.

But pretend on, deceiving yourself that the current admin did not TWICE destroy BC hoops.

As a result, our program is more like that of the U of Phoenix than it is like the teams against which we were competitive before 2010-11.
BC once attracted stars like Abrams, Adams, Agbai, Austin, Bagley, Barros, Bell, Curley, Driscoll, Dudley, Eisley, Evans, Huckaby, Jackson, McCready, Murphy, O'Brien, Rice, Smith, Williams, et al.

Those days are gone.

And who is responsible for that?
User avatar
MaroonNGold
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 420
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2013 11:53 pm
Location: St. Ignatius, praying for a leader who'll restore BC's trustworthiness.
Karma: -497

Next

Return to Conte Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Untitled document
cron