commavegarage {l Wrote}:love people saying give clifford time now that he's actually on the court because he's been hurt since 1996 yet he was supposed to immediately step in at any point and save any of the last 3 seasons
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:UMass with a lot of rebounds and a win by 8. 71-63.
claver2010 {l Wrote}:“@GoodmanESPN: Nice to see BC big man Dennis Clifford back on the court. If he'd been healthy, there's a chance Steve Donahue would still be Eagles coach.”
Bender {l Wrote}:This game was hard to watch, they played great in the first half, only to have the refs keep UMass in it. Lalanne should have fouled out before half-time, but they refused to believe that his offensive elbows and grabs with his off hand on defense should be called on a star player of his magnitude.
Hanlan ran out of gas after carrying the team for the first half and being the only guy who could create anything.
I feel good for Clifford being able to play after his hard work, but he's not an elite big man and is only serviceable at this point.
Heckmann for all his flaws is the second best player on this team right now, and that is why this team will struggle against high D-1 teams.
UMass exposes BC's weaknesses very well, they have all the length and athleticism that BC doesn't, especially a guy like Esho who can tie his shoes without bending over and jumps out of the gym. I still think that BC could've beat them because UMass is going nowhere this year. Refs really looked for excuses as to why to make some call in UMass favor, my favorite was when the guy Hinds fell over trying to dive into Odio who had moved out of the way and he was rewarded with two free throws. My second favorite was whatever they called to give UMass the ball when Brown was mugged from behind then collided with UMass' back-up center.
Eaglekeeper {l Wrote}:BC played most of the 1st half without Clifford and most of the 2nd half with Clifford, enough said.
DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:I've been as down on Christian as anyone, but I'm surprised by all the animosity after yesterday's game. I thought it was going to go much worse than it did.
Iggle {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:love people saying give clifford time now that he's actually on the court because he's been hurt since 1996 yet he was supposed to immediately step in at any point and save any of the last 3 seasons
if clifford had been on the court and healthy last season, then he would not have been away from actual basketball for so long, so that's not really all that inconsistent. And Anderson was on the team last year - he would've been able to play his natural position. He would've helped. Clifford doesn't look great and is not going to become some monster but if he has something to show (and that's a BIG IF) it makes sense that it will take more than 50 minutes of game time before he's back to speed (I don't expect very much from Clifford at all, for the record)
jhiggi02 {l Wrote}:Iggle {l Wrote}:commavegarage {l Wrote}:love people saying give clifford time now that he's actually on the court because he's been hurt since 1996 yet he was supposed to immediately step in at any point and save any of the last 3 seasons
if clifford had been on the court and healthy last season, then he would not have been away from actual basketball for so long, so that's not really all that inconsistent. And Anderson was on the team last year - he would've been able to play his natural position. He would've helped. Clifford doesn't look great and is not going to become some monster but if he has something to show (and that's a BIG IF) it makes sense that it will take more than 50 minutes of game time before he's back to speed (I don't expect very much from Clifford at all, for the record)
These are my thoughts exactly. I never said he was a world beater and think he will improve as he gets more run
Comm, how are you not able to understand that it takes some time in game play to actually get back into the swing of things? Also, saying he will improve, which I think anyone who comprehends sports should understand why, and that he will be an all star are two vastly different things.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:my prediction is that umass will prove throughout the year that they are actually quite bad and this loss will grow weaker and weaker as the season progresses
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:my prediction is that umass will prove throughout the year that they are actually quite bad and this loss will grow weaker and weaker as the season progresses
Then the LORD Shockdoct made an Eepstein0 from the weiner he had taken off of TobaccoRoadEagle, and he brought it to Conte Forum.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:eagle9903 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:my prediction is that umass will prove throughout the year that they are actually quite bad and this loss will grow weaker and weaker as the season progresses
Then the LORD Shockdoct made an Eepstein0 from the weiner he had taken off of TobaccoRoadEagle, and he brought it to Conte Forum.
this scared me so i checked. my weener is still attached and appears to be doing just fine.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:That team can't afford any of the top 6 guys to get hurt or get in foul trouble. If they are going to play defense like that (which I like) you are going to see a lot of games like last night.
Also, the team has zero point guards. That is a problem. As a PG, Hanlan is a great SG, and he's the only option. Pressing teams will beat BC all year.
MaroonNGold {l Wrote}:...Think I'll walk over to Devlin to watch the Fed Ex delivery of those re-admission applications from AZ and CA.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:That team can't afford any of the top 6 guys to get hurt or get in foul trouble. If they are going to play defense like that (which I like) you are going to see a lot of games like last night.
Also, the team has zero point guards. That is a problem. As a PG, Hanlan is a great SG, and he's the only option. Pressing teams will beat BC all year.
We didn't actually commit fouls last night, which was my problem. Clifford and Brown committed 0 real fouls in the first half.
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:That team can't afford any of the top 6 guys to get hurt or get in foul trouble. If they are going to play defense like that (which I like) you are going to see a lot of games like last night.
Also, the team has zero point guards. That is a problem. As a PG, Hanlan is a great SG, and he's the only option. Pressing teams will beat BC all year.
We didn't actually commit fouls last night, which was my problem. Clifford and Brown committed 0 real fouls in the first half.
They fouled a lot. I agree that the refs were terrible, particularly since they refused to call any fouls on the "blocks" of UMass' overrated big, but BC fouled a lot.
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:eepstein0 {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:That team can't afford any of the top 6 guys to get hurt or get in foul trouble. If they are going to play defense like that (which I like) you are going to see a lot of games like last night.
Also, the team has zero point guards. That is a problem. As a PG, Hanlan is a great SG, and he's the only option. Pressing teams will beat BC all year.
We didn't actually commit fouls last night, which was my problem. Clifford and Brown committed 0 real fouls in the first half.
They fouled a lot. I agree that the refs were terrible, particularly since they refused to call any fouls on the "blocks" of UMass' overrated big, but BC fouled a lot.
Neither of Clifford's fouls had any contact whatsoever, nor Brown's.
Laline also literally should've fouled out twice. It had a huge effect on the game
BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:fouls were the difference last night. we dominated in rebounds, had the same amount of made FG's, BC had more 3's... I'd like to see how good this team would be without the new fouling rules.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests