The Largest Independent Community of Boston College Fans and Alumni
http://eagleoutsider.com/phpbb/
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:21 am
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:25 amangrychicken {l Wrote}:He's definitely under the radar, but he's a proven winner.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:35 amtwballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:How much money do you think BC hoop actually makes on tickets?
not enough to "cover" the scholarships
Not enough to cover anything in that dump. Tickets are not meaningless, but close.
I've never understood why people think ticket sales are a huge source of revenue. Maybe back in the dicketys when Dr. Jack Ryan wooed lasses with his onion belt.
you're right - all schools... carolina, rcc, bc, etc. should just light their ticket money on fire because it's meaningless and no one should care what people are willing to pay to watch
Yes, Conte Forum ... Dean Dome, very similar. Very similar in that ticket sales are borderline meaningless, but with a very large gap in degree.
BC's ticket revenue is probably 8-10 times more meaningless than UNC's. But until the TV gets uninvented, meaningless.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:36 amCadillac90 {l Wrote}:... Pedo St.? ... It is arguably more difficult to recruit there than at BC...
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:38 amCadillac90 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:He's definitely under the radar, but he's a proven winner.
I thought he was just a football coach?
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:48 amangrychicken {l Wrote}:Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:He's definitely under the radar, but he's a proven winner.
I thought he was just a football coach?
Do you not see the basketball in his hands? Geez
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:50 amCadillac90 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:He's definitely under the radar, but he's a proven winner.
I thought he was just a football coach?
Do you not see the basketball in his hands? Geez
Spaz liked to play baseball doesn't mean he was a baseball coach.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 11:53 amTobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:... Pedo St.? ... It is arguably more difficult to recruit there than at BC...
based on what, mrs. s?
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:00 pmCadillac90 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:He's definitely under the radar, but he's a proven winner.
I thought he was just a football coach?
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:02 pmOnyx Blackman {l Wrote}:Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:He's definitely under the radar, but he's a proven winner.
I thought he was just a football coach?
You're thinking of Coach Lenny Chimp. This is Coach Kenny Chimp.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:05 pmTobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:pick6pedro {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:twballgame9 {l Wrote}:How much money do you think BC hoop actually makes on tickets?
not enough to "cover" the scholarships
Not enough to cover anything in that dump. Tickets are not meaningless, but close.
I've never understood why people think ticket sales are a huge source of revenue. Maybe back in the dicketys when Dr. Jack Ryan wooed lasses with his onion belt.
you're right - all schools... carolina, rcc, bc, etc. should just light their ticket money on fire because it's meaningless and no one should care what people are willing to pay to watch
Yes, Conte Forum ... Dean Dome, very similar. Very similar in that ticket sales are borderline meaningless, but with a very large gap in degree.
BC's ticket revenue is probably 8-10 times more meaningless than UNC's. But until the TV gets uninvented, meaningless.
i read the prick's message as "ticker revenue doesn't matter to anyone, anywhere" which is what garnered my response.
and we only need to uninvent espn, not television in general drama queen
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:13 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:54 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:56 pmThe resume MUST include…
Previous head coaching experience for a large, state university with high expectations for wins
A track record of top blue-chip recruiting
A minimum of 3 NCAA tournament wins (collectively, all career) in his previous head coaching jobs
A willingness to work for less than $1m a year and sign a contract for no more than 3 years (if he can’t get it done, just let the contract run out)
That is a tall order, and I want it all. Anything less than this, I will be disappointed. Brad, go get him.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 12:57 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:13 pmb0mberMan {l Wrote}:BC Hoops authority innocentbystander (love his HOT TAKES) has given the official criteria on BCI:The resume MUST include…
Previous head coaching experience for a large, state university with high expectations for wins
A track record of top blue-chip recruiting
A minimum of 3 NCAA tournament wins (collectively, all career) in his previous head coaching jobs
A willingness to work for less than $1m a year and sign a contract for no more than 3 years (if he can’t get it done, just let the contract run out)
That is a tall order, and I want it all. Anything less than this, I will be disappointed. Brad, go get him.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 1:51 pmb0mberMan {l Wrote}:BC Hoops authority innocentbystander (love his HOT TAKES) has given the official criteria on BCI:The resume MUST include…
Previous head coaching experience for a large, state university with high expectations for wins
A track record of top blue-chip recruiting
A minimum of 3 NCAA tournament wins (collectively, all career) in his previous head coaching jobs
A willingness to work for less than $1m a year and sign a contract for no more than 3 years (if he can’t get it done, just let the contract run out)
That is a tall order, and I want it all. Anything less than this, I will be disappointed. Brad, go get him.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:07 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:15 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:44 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:09 pm
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 5:32 pmDick Rosenthal {l Wrote}:Getting out of the way, why the fixation on Hopkins? It isn't as if Syracuse is considered a superbly coached team. To some extent, Boeheim deserves a place on the Mount Rushmore of coaches who did very little with an embarrassment of riches next to John Thompson, Dean Smith and Blubberin' Roy Williams. I have heard people say that Hopkins is a great recruiter--not that he is an x and o genius. Well, how hard is it to recruit at Syracuse.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:19 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 6:59 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:06 pmBCEagles25 {l Wrote}:Mike Hopkins has been observing Jim Boehim coach since 1989. as a result, he has most likely learned everything he knows from a legend. I would imagine Hopkins to be prepared the way Boehim is prepared, recruit in the manner and pattern that he recruits and has been to championship(s) and has some experience getting through the tournament. sounds like he's worth a shot.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:15 pmangrychicken {l Wrote}:BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:Mike Hopkins has been observing Jim Boehim coach since 1989. as a result, he has most likely learned everything he knows from a legend. I would imagine Hopkins to be prepared the way Boehim is prepared, recruit in the manner and pattern that he recruits and has been to championship(s) and has some experience getting through the tournament. sounds like he's worth a shot.
In situations like this, there is often a good reason why the guy has never moved up to a top spot. Some guys are just born to be #2.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:19 pmangrychicken {l Wrote}:BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:Mike Hopkins has been observing Jim Boehim coach since 1989. as a result, he has most likely learned everything he knows from a legend. I would imagine Hopkins to be prepared the way Boehim is prepared, recruit in the manner and pattern that he recruits and has been to championship(s) and has some experience getting through the tournament. sounds like he's worth a shot.
In situations like this, there is often a good reason why the guy has never moved up to a top spot. Some guys are just born to be #2.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:32 pmPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 7:58 pmangrychicken {l Wrote}:BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:Mike Hopkins has been observing Jim Boehim coach since 1989. as a result, he has most likely learned everything he knows from a legend. I would imagine Hopkins to be prepared the way Boehim is prepared, recruit in the manner and pattern that he recruits and has been to championship(s) and has some experience getting through the tournament. sounds like he's worth a shot.
In situations like this, there is often a good reason why the guy has never moved up to a top spot. Some guys are just born to be #2.
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 8:55 pmBCEagles25 {l Wrote}:angrychicken {l Wrote}:BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:Mike Hopkins has been observing Jim Boehim coach since 1989. as a result, he has most likely learned everything he knows from a legend. I would imagine Hopkins to be prepared the way Boehim is prepared, recruit in the manner and pattern that he recruits and has been to championship(s) and has some experience getting through the tournament. sounds like he's worth a shot.
In situations like this, there is often a good reason why the guy has never moved up to a top spot. Some guys are just born to be #2.
this is a good point, but I think like pedro said, it's probably because he's been told he's the coach in waiting whenever Boehim steps down...