This is opinion mixed with gossip. Take it for what it is worth. GDF and those around him liked to talk. Bates holds things closer to the vest. Plus the football search showed that the BOT will be involved. With GDF's hires they just rubber stamped his choices.
hinghameagle {l Wrote}:A few opinion questions for ATL, or others:
My lazy research saya Howland made $2mill per year at UCLA. Maybe another half a million for shoe deals, tv stuff, radio, summer camps and so on. Lets say 2.5 per.
1. If he asks for that same compensation, is the negotiation over before it starts.
2. Do you think BC will pay that type of money to any coach, even if they firmly believe it is the right guy and it is a solid investment.
3. Howland has 3 final four's under his belt, are we are fooling ourselves to think that a coach like that would want BC?
4. He is on paper a better coach than Pearl, who many beleive would not want BC, so why Howland?
5. is it fair to asssume that there will be other jobs open for Howland that are better jobs and will compensate him at a higher salary.
5. Odds right now of Howland to BC? 25%, less or more?
6. Odds right now of Pearl to BC? 25% more or less?
1. BC could pay that much. I have no idea if they will. The money from the attendance boost alone could cover the cost. I am sure we could get Under Armour to kick a little more Howland's way too.
2. BC won't hand Amaker or any of the other B list guys $2 million. Pearl and Howland are the only guys I could see getting megadeals.
3 and 4. Aside from the NCAA baggage, I think Howland is more likely because he wants a program like BC. Based on what I've heard about him (and Hawaii Rob could echo this), he really disliked the nonbasketball stuff at UCLA. Didn't like the one and done types and didn't like the opinionated boosters. I think he knows he could recruit the northeast like he did at Pitt, win like Skinner and lead a relatively basketball focused life. From a BC perspective the downside of Howland is he won't be the ambassador that Pearl would be. Howland won't paint his chest for a women's hoops game or spend every off day down at ESPN.
5 and 6. It really depends on how desperate BC gets. Both are there for the taking. But in the last 40 years under two different presidents and four different ADs, we've only hired two big names. One was Milbury and the other was Henning. Our history says we will probably end up with a guy looking to make the move up and not the guy looking for a second shot at the big time.