Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby innocentbystander on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:38 pm

Nicely done.

Best win of the season.
Feminism: Eve eats ALL the apples, gives God the middle finder when He confronts her, and has the serpent serve Adam with an injunction ordering him to stay away from her AND to provide her food and shelter because he dragged her out of the Garden.
User avatar
innocentbystander
BC Guy
 
Posts: 21762
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pac-12 Hell
Karma: -3661

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby Iggle on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:41 pm

MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:
Iggle {l Wrote}:is Hanlan a legit ACC ROY candidate? more importantly, does he have a legit shot at winning the ACC ROY given that he plays for BC and the team is still not good?


Almost every game the announcers suggest he is the leading candidate to win ACC ROY. Who else is in contention?


I haven't watched the last few games live so it's good to hear the announcers taking notice. Every "best 25 freshman" etc. list I've seen on ESPN have had a couple of ACC players and no Hanlan in sight. TJ Warren and Rasheed Suliamon, specifically. Pretty similar numbers considering minutes played, and they play for NC State/Duke respectively.
zzz
Iggle
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:33 pm
Karma: 126

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby Hunta518 on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:44 pm

MilitantEagle {l Wrote}:
Iggle {l Wrote}:is Hanlan a legit ACC ROY candidate? more importantly, does he have a legit shot at winning the ACC ROY given that he plays for BC and the team is still not good?


Almost every game the announcers suggest he is the leading candidate to win ACC ROY. Who else is in contention?


TJ Warren. He had 31pts and 13rebs for NC State tonight.
Hunta518
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1296
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:28 pm
Karma: 57

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby missoulaEagle on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:46 pm

Anderson did yeoman work today: solid defense, good screens, fine floor game. But if he could improve versatility by developing a legitimate jump shot, esp. for pick and pops (and especially if he is going to keep playing so much 5), he will become an even more dangerous offensive weapon.
User avatar
missoulaEagle
n00b
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:42 pm
Karma: 15

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby claver2010 on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:49 pm

21-22 from the line tonight
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
BC Guy
 
Posts: 20301
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 3380

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby missoulaEagle on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:50 pm

Odio played 31 minutes. wow.
User avatar
missoulaEagle
n00b
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 2:42 pm
Karma: 15

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:01 am

Solid win.

Logan Aronholt was the leading scorer for MD? Christ that is bad. Both in that that was their best option and that BC gave up that many to Albany's third option last season. I hadn't even realized he transferred there.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34343
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby BCEaglesFan on Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:59 am

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Solid win.

Logan Aronholt was the leading scorer for MD? Christ that is bad. Both in that that was their best option and that BC gave up that many to Albany's third option last season. I hadn't even realized he transferred there.

I'd rather take Aronhalt killing nus than Len, who had 4 points...
Follow me on twitter at @BeantownSports4 and at my new youtube channel BCEaglesHighlights http://www.youtube.com/user/BCEaglesHig ... ature=mhee
BCEaglesFan
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1641
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 5:56 pm
Karma: -36

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby claver2010 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:06 am

So some NBA gm is going to waste a top 10 pick on Len? I don't follow the NBA much and 7' don't grow on trees but in the 2 games he's played us, thoroughly unimpressed. 4 points in 27 minutes when mathes up primarily against Anderson?

Don't see how Hanlan isn't the ROY

Nice to W a game when they don't shoot well from 3, 3-20 by people not named Hanlan

Edit: also Anderson had an off game, he was grabbing his shoulder for much of the 2nd half CONTENT!
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
BC Guy
 
Posts: 20301
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 3380

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 9:27 am

so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eepstein0 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:41 am

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more
User avatar
eepstein0
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 17672
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:35 pm
Karma: -289

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby BC923 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:32 am

Assorted thoughts:
Hanlan is very very good
We need another big
If Odio develops a jumpshot he will be extremely good
Anderson played much better than his statline, but i'd like to see some contribution on offense.
BC923
Merkert Hall
 
Posts: 3461
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 10:11 pm
Karma: 457

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:54 am

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:47 pm

anyone notice that this team is now no. 2 in the ACC in team FT% at .720. That's a big improvement from earlier in the year.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby Bunratty on Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:58 pm

The jury is still out on Donahue's ability to recruit. Hanlan (especially) and Rahon were good gets. So far next year is not so good, to put it mildly. By all accounts Garland Owens is a "project" and the other recruits ..... oh, wait ...... there are no other recruits.
Bunratty
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:00 pm
Karma: 27

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby Iggle on Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:58 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:anyone notice that this team is now no. 2 in the ACC in team FT% at .720. That's a big improvement from earlier in the year.


I'm having trouble finding easy way to show game splits but I feel like it was just a 7-ish game stretch starting at the beginning of ACC play where FT shooting became an issue. Some games the % was high but it missed something like 4 front ends of 1-and-1s. It was incredibly strange and infuriating and led directly into some losses, it seems like.

I'm wondering if it was just nerves - it was one thing when it was 1-2 games and "well, this will hop back up to the average" but it was a prolonged stretch of abominable, game killing FT shooting. That seems much better now.
zzz
Iggle
Campion Hall
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:33 pm
Karma: 126

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby claver2010 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:06 pm

65-75 (87%) in last 4 games...imagine if they shot anywhere close to that back when they were getting to the line 30x/game early in acc play

They were 90/140 (65%) in the 1st 5 acc games, also it wasn't only the bricks, it was missed front ends of 1 and 1s
Bush, George H W
Cosby, Bill
Disick, Scott
Flair, Ric
Griffin, Kathy
Khamenei, Ali
McCain, John
Pele
Soros, George
User avatar
claver2010
BC Guy
 
Posts: 20301
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:55 pm
Karma: 3380

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:09 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34343
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby commavegarage on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:13 pm

great stuff...a 3-2 finish and a win in the acc tourney would be very nice to see
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7230
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 749

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby commavegarage on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:15 pm

also a 4-1 finish (so lose to duke beat nc state uva clemson and gt) would be massive because it would put us at 16-15 pre tournament.
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7230
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 749

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:47 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

1st, the concept of what constitutes a "marginal" player is wrong. This is similar to the "ACC Player" designation of old. Going through former BC teams, it is not normal to have more than 2 All-ACC/BE candidate players on a given team. Odio, Jackson and Clifford are all solid recruitment gets. Heckmann is a contributor with upside. Caudill and Moton are the only clear recruiting misses. Daniels is whatever you want to call him.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

Sure, if you accept the "run-off" of all Skinner players as blameable and you assume a coach coming from the Ivy league (even with Joe Jones DURRRRRP) to somehow bring in a real recruiting class after an April hire and assume the blind injuries should be accounted for myth, then depth is an issue blameable on recruiting. This is added to if you want to conflate roster management with depth, assume Humphrey or Daniels would improve the situation through their added depth rather than causing a fuckload of additional problems in terms of developing their far superior replacements. What former BC teams would be able to replace their starting center in the case of injury? Not the senior year Bell team, that's why it didn't make the tourney. What peer ACC teams would be able to do so? This is oft repeated but remains wrong.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.

There are two clear misses as far as recruited high school students. One was in the transition class. I don't like Van Nest but he is contributing and it is better to have him than not have him. Since Clifford's injury wasn't known until the season began or right before, he was a reasonable acquisition at the time. Humphrey stinks. Is three misses really too many? Or are we pretending that Odio, Jackson and Heckmann aren't and can't be contributors?
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:49 pm

Bunratty {l Wrote}:The jury is still out on Donahue's ability to recruit. Hanlan (especially) and Rahon were good gets. So far next year is not so good, to put it mildly. By all accounts Garland Owens is a "project" and the other recruits ..... oh, wait ...... there are no other recruits.


Right the jury is still out. Last year around this time Donahue couldn't recruit because Olivier Hanlan and Joe Rahon were both unheralded, now Garland Owens is a project. I absolutely love calling the recruiting class before its over too.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eepstein0 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:33 pm

commavegarage {l Wrote}:also a 4-1 finish (so lose to duke beat nc state uva clemson and gt) would be massive because it would put us at 16-15 pre tournament.


No chance. I could see 3-2 maybe. At Clemson is a house of horrors for BC
User avatar
eepstein0
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 17672
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:35 pm
Karma: -289

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby Bunratty on Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:40 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
Bunratty {l Wrote}:The jury is still out on Donahue's ability to recruit. Hanlan (especially) and Rahon were good gets. So far next year is not so good, to put it mildly. By all accounts Garland Owens is a "project" and the other recruits ..... oh, wait ...... there are no other recruits.


Right the jury is still out. Last year around this time Donahue couldn't recruit because Olivier Hanlan and Joe Rahon were both unheralded, now Garland Owens is a project. I absolutely love calling the recruiting class before its over too.


Incorrect. Hanlan was Rivals 3-star with offers from Dayton, Rice, TCU and VTech. He was "blowing up" in recruiting circles, but committed early on 10/25/12. Rahon was also a Rivals 3-star with offers from Fresno St., Georgetown, Loyola, St. Mary's, San Diego and San Diego St. He committed on 10/12/12. Conversely, Owens is unranked by Rivals and has offers from New Hampshire, N.J.I.T., Hartford, Seton Hall, and UTEP. Virtually every write up on him refers to him as a "project" particularly offensively. Maybe he'll surprise - we'll see.

The bigger concern is that it is 2/20/13 and The Don has whiffed on several good recruits and there is no one else in sight. It's getting late.
Bunratty
McGuinn Hall
 
Posts: 706
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:00 pm
Karma: 27

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:14 pm

Bunratty {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
Bunratty {l Wrote}:The jury is still out on Donahue's ability to recruit. Hanlan (especially) and Rahon were good gets. So far next year is not so good, to put it mildly. By all accounts Garland Owens is a "project" and the other recruits ..... oh, wait ...... there are no other recruits.


Right the jury is still out. Last year around this time Donahue couldn't recruit because Olivier Hanlan and Joe Rahon were both unheralded, now Garland Owens is a project. I absolutely love calling the recruiting class before its over too.


Incorrect. Hanlan was Rivals 3-star with offers from Dayton, Rice, TCU and VTech. He was "blowing up" in recruiting circles, but committed early on 10/25/12. Rahon was also a Rivals 3-star with offers from Fresno St., Georgetown, Loyola, St. Mary's, San Diego and San Diego St. He committed on 10/12/12. Conversely, Owens is unranked by Rivals and has offers from New Hampshire, N.J.I.T., Hartford, Seton Hall, and UTEP. Virtually every write up on him refers to him as a "project" particularly offensively. Maybe he'll surprise - we'll see.

The bigger concern is that it is 2/20/13 and The Don has whiffed on several good recruits and there is no one else in sight. It's getting late.


Although those are things I pointed to last year, posters here continuously bitched about how Donahue had the worst recruiting class in the ACC, excusing Rahon's impressive offers as pre-knee injury. Since Owens committed on 10/21/12 between the Hanlan and Rahon commit dates, I don't see how he should not similarly receive the benefit of more offers as you point to for Hanlan and Rahon above (you mean 2011 above, but that's not my point). I can't say Owens will be a star, but I would not be surprised at all by significant early contributions and four solid years. The flip side of the write ups of his play are that he is freakishly athletic and is tough. Certainly not a bad element to add.

Furthermore, it's probably pretty hard to recruit guards right now [meaning this class] when there are so few minutes available and the players holding the minutes will be here for a long time, thus Jorgenson who I would have liked would have been a significant plus in terms of recruiting effort. Instead he decided on a school whose starting PG is graduating (Udofia). I still think Rashard Kelly will likely be part of this class as will another 5th year transfer.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:35 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

1st, the concept of what constitutes a "marginal" player is wrong. This is similar to the "ACC Player" designation of old. Going through former BC teams, it is not normal to have more than 2 All-ACC/BE candidate players on a given team. Odio, Jackson and Clifford are all solid recruitment gets. Heckmann is a contributor with upside. Caudill and Moton are the only clear recruiting misses. Daniels is whatever you want to call him.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

Sure, if you accept the "run-off" of all Skinner players as blameable and you assume a coach coming from the Ivy league (even with Joe Jones DURRRRRP) to somehow bring in a real recruiting class after an April hire and assume the blind injuries should be accounted for myth, then depth is an issue blameable on recruiting. This is added to if you want to conflate roster management with depth, assume Humphrey or Daniels would improve the situation through their added depth rather than causing a fuckload of additional problems in terms of developing their far superior replacements. What former BC teams would be able to replace their starting center in the case of injury? Not the senior year Bell team, that's why it didn't make the tourney. What peer ACC teams would be able to do so? This is oft repeated but remains wrong.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.

There are two clear misses as far as recruited high school students. One was in the transition class. I don't like Van Nest but he is contributing and it is better to have him than not have him. Since Clifford's injury wasn't known until the season began or right before, he was a reasonable acquisition at the time. Humphrey stinks. Is three misses really too many? Or are we pretending that Odio, Jackson and Heckmann aren't and can't be contributors?


Can't possibly disagree with your first point more. Solid recruiting gets for a below .500 conference team during a down period of the conference. I'd rather win.

Second point, you have the excuse train talking points down.

Third point, I disagree with your definition of "clear misses". If you are looking to win a conference championship, there are a ton of misses. Ever to Reach .500!

Final point. Odio is not a good basketball player. He works hard, jumps high, and shouldn't be on an ACC roster.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34343
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:39 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

1st, the concept of what constitutes a "marginal" player is wrong. This is similar to the "ACC Player" designation of old. Going through former BC teams, it is not normal to have more than 2 All-ACC/BE candidate players on a given team. Odio, Jackson and Clifford are all solid recruitment gets. Heckmann is a contributor with upside. Caudill and Moton are the only clear recruiting misses. Daniels is whatever you want to call him.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

Sure, if you accept the "run-off" of all Skinner players as blameable and you assume a coach coming from the Ivy league (even with Joe Jones DURRRRRP) to somehow bring in a real recruiting class after an April hire and assume the blind injuries should be accounted for myth, then depth is an issue blameable on recruiting. This is added to if you want to conflate roster management with depth, assume Humphrey or Daniels would improve the situation through their added depth rather than causing a fuckload of additional problems in terms of developing their far superior replacements. What former BC teams would be able to replace their starting center in the case of injury? Not the senior year Bell team, that's why it didn't make the tourney. What peer ACC teams would be able to do so? This is oft repeated but remains wrong.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.

There are two clear misses as far as recruited high school students. One was in the transition class. I don't like Van Nest but he is contributing and it is better to have him than not have him. Since Clifford's injury wasn't known until the season began or right before, he was a reasonable acquisition at the time. Humphrey stinks. Is three misses really too many? Or are we pretending that Odio, Jackson and Heckmann aren't and can't be contributors?


Can't possibly disagree with your first point more. Solid recruiting gets for a below .500 conference team during a down period of the conference. I'd rather win.

Second point, you have the excuse train talking points down.

Third point, I disagree with your definition of "clear misses". If you are looking to win a conference championship, there are a ton of misses. Ever to Reach .500!

Final point. Odio is not a good basketball player. He works hard, jumps high, and shouldn't be on an ACC roster.


OK, so even though what we've been talking about all along has been first to get back into the tournament by next season, we've now moved the goalposts to conference champion. I'll take that as a good sign.

Your Odio comment is assinine. Name your clear misses.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:47 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

1st, the concept of what constitutes a "marginal" player is wrong. This is similar to the "ACC Player" designation of old. Going through former BC teams, it is not normal to have more than 2 All-ACC/BE candidate players on a given team. Odio, Jackson and Clifford are all solid recruitment gets. Heckmann is a contributor with upside. Caudill and Moton are the only clear recruiting misses. Daniels is whatever you want to call him.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

Sure, if you accept the "run-off" of all Skinner players as blameable and you assume a coach coming from the Ivy league (even with Joe Jones DURRRRRP) to somehow bring in a real recruiting class after an April hire and assume the blind injuries should be accounted for myth, then depth is an issue blameable on recruiting. This is added to if you want to conflate roster management with depth, assume Humphrey or Daniels would improve the situation through their added depth rather than causing a fuckload of additional problems in terms of developing their far superior replacements. What former BC teams would be able to replace their starting center in the case of injury? Not the senior year Bell team, that's why it didn't make the tourney. What peer ACC teams would be able to do so? This is oft repeated but remains wrong.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.

There are two clear misses as far as recruited high school students. One was in the transition class. I don't like Van Nest but he is contributing and it is better to have him than not have him. Since Clifford's injury wasn't known until the season began or right before, he was a reasonable acquisition at the time. Humphrey stinks. Is three misses really too many? Or are we pretending that Odio, Jackson and Heckmann aren't and can't be contributors?


Can't possibly disagree with your first point more. Solid recruiting gets for a below .500 conference team during a down period of the conference. I'd rather win.

Second point, you have the excuse train talking points down.

Third point, I disagree with your definition of "clear misses". If you are looking to win a conference championship, there are a ton of misses. Ever to Reach .500!

Final point. Odio is not a good basketball player. He works hard, jumps high, and shouldn't be on an ACC roster.


OK, so even though what we've been talking about all along has been first to get back into the tournament by next season, we've now moved the goalposts to conference champion. I'll take that as a good sign.

Your Odio comment is assinine. Name your clear misses.


No. Attacking a team with 4 conference wins is piling on. Their performance is shitty enough on its own. Your mental gymnastics to defend a mediocre roster with no depth and a sub-.500 record caught my attention, but I am not interested in turning this into another 5 page thread on 3 point make percentage versus take percentage as a measure of defense.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34343
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby eagle9903 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:52 pm

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

1st, the concept of what constitutes a "marginal" player is wrong. This is similar to the "ACC Player" designation of old. Going through former BC teams, it is not normal to have more than 2 All-ACC/BE candidate players on a given team. Odio, Jackson and Clifford are all solid recruitment gets. Heckmann is a contributor with upside. Caudill and Moton are the only clear recruiting misses. Daniels is whatever you want to call him.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

Sure, if you accept the "run-off" of all Skinner players as blameable and you assume a coach coming from the Ivy league (even with Joe Jones DURRRRRP) to somehow bring in a real recruiting class after an April hire and assume the blind injuries should be accounted for myth, then depth is an issue blameable on recruiting. This is added to if you want to conflate roster management with depth, assume Humphrey or Daniels would improve the situation through their added depth rather than causing a fuckload of additional problems in terms of developing their far superior replacements. What former BC teams would be able to replace their starting center in the case of injury? Not the senior year Bell team, that's why it didn't make the tourney. What peer ACC teams would be able to do so? This is oft repeated but remains wrong.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.

There are two clear misses as far as recruited high school students. One was in the transition class. I don't like Van Nest but he is contributing and it is better to have him than not have him. Since Clifford's injury wasn't known until the season began or right before, he was a reasonable acquisition at the time. Humphrey stinks. Is three misses really too many? Or are we pretending that Odio, Jackson and Heckmann aren't and can't be contributors?


Can't possibly disagree with your first point more. Solid recruiting gets for a below .500 conference team during a down period of the conference. I'd rather win.

Second point, you have the excuse train talking points down.

Third point, I disagree with your definition of "clear misses". If you are looking to win a conference championship, there are a ton of misses. Ever to Reach .500!

Final point. Odio is not a good basketball player. He works hard, jumps high, and shouldn't be on an ACC roster.


OK, so even though what we've been talking about all along has been first to get back into the tournament by next season, we've now moved the goalposts to conference champion. I'll take that as a good sign.

Your Odio comment is assinine. Name your clear misses.


No. Attacking a team with 4 conference wins is piling on. Their performance is shitty enough on its own. Your mental gymnastics to defend a mediocre roster with no depth and a sub-.500 record caught my attention, but I am not interested in turning this into another 5 page thread on 3 point make percentage versus take percentage as a measure of defense.


So to recap, you created your own standard of good recruiting. It is indefensible when compared to reality. When faced with the task of trying to comport your tortured standard with reality you took your ball and went home.

Its better than last year and your blanket "players don't really improve as they play more" stance.
domingoortiz
eepstein0
corporal funishment
innocentbystander
davidgordonswang
maybe hansen
User avatar
eagle9903
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 14311
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:16 pm
Karma: 1728

Re: Maryland @ Boston College 2/19

Postby twballgame9 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:55 pm

eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
twballgame9 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
eagle9903 {l Wrote}:so before one of you assholes goes in this direction, on BCI right now one poster is still saying Donahue can't recruit and on the topic above another poster is complaining about how Hanlan will probably leave early for the NBA and Donahue hasn't recruited his replacement yet. FUCKING BRILLIANT!


This win aside, we need more help next year. A guard and a big. Just having more scholarship bodies.

Van Nest was decent last night. Hopefully he continues to play more


Only some offense intended, but you have dismissed half of the contributing members of the team as non contributors either before they played a game or before they played a whole season (most notably criticisms of Odio, Rahon, Jackson but you are also on record as thinking the Hanlan/Rahon recruiting class wasn't talented enough to compete in the ACC). This team is adding two more players(i won't count Donahue the player at this point since he gets not schollie) at least next year and my guess would be four. The depth issue should be diminished, one way or another. We will see.

It is absurd to say Donahue can't recruit and to say Hanlan is going to be less than a four year player at this point (because those things are contradictory). It is also absurd to say Donahue can't recruit bigs when his PF is the fourth leading rebounder and sixth leading scorer in the ACC and his talented 7'0 center got hurt especially when the attempted point is that he should have an extra 7'0 center lying around for such circumstances. At this point people are down to complaining that the 2011 class is too big which is completely and utterly retarded, unless they were proponents of fielding a 5-6 scholarship team. Or people are down to carving out stupid niches, like Donahue can't recruit players over 6'6 since Joe Jones left which lacks heartily for shown causal relationship not to mention its prematurity.


Recruiting is not just bringing in 2 guys that are legit and a bunch of marginal guys that contribute. The point missing in your post is that recruiting 1 top guard and 1 top big man in 3 years is hardly proof of good recruiting.

1st, the concept of what constitutes a "marginal" player is wrong. This is similar to the "ACC Player" designation of old. Going through former BC teams, it is not normal to have more than 2 All-ACC/BE candidate players on a given team. Odio, Jackson and Clifford are all solid recruitment gets. Heckmann is a contributor with upside. Caudill and Moton are the only clear recruiting misses. Daniels is whatever you want to call him.

Depth has always been an issue. That's recruiting. The guard problem can be blamed on Daniels leaving (fair excuse) and having to run 3-guard (not fair excuse because of next point) but the forward problem is an abysmal failure in recruiting. BC has one healthy player over 6'5'' that can truly contribute to a winning team. Unacceptable.

Sure, if you accept the "run-off" of all Skinner players as blameable and you assume a coach coming from the Ivy league (even with Joe Jones DURRRRRP) to somehow bring in a real recruiting class after an April hire and assume the blind injuries should be accounted for myth, then depth is an issue blameable on recruiting. This is added to if you want to conflate roster management with depth, assume Humphrey or Daniels would improve the situation through their added depth rather than causing a fuckload of additional problems in terms of developing their far superior replacements. What former BC teams would be able to replace their starting center in the case of injury? Not the senior year Bell team, that's why it didn't make the tourney. What peer ACC teams would be able to do so? This is oft repeated but remains wrong.

That said, he certainly did a good job with Hanlan, Rahon and Anderson, I give him credit for Clifford, and he filled in with some nice pieces like Jackson. The problem is that there were too many misses to provide sufficient depth. He has time to fix it, but he better do it soon - Drago will help but Owens is a long term fix and there is no big on the horizon. He must get a decent big in this class.

There are two clear misses as far as recruited high school students. One was in the transition class. I don't like Van Nest but he is contributing and it is better to have him than not have him. Since Clifford's injury wasn't known until the season began or right before, he was a reasonable acquisition at the time. Humphrey stinks. Is three misses really too many? Or are we pretending that Odio, Jackson and Heckmann aren't and can't be contributors?


Can't possibly disagree with your first point more. Solid recruiting gets for a below .500 conference team during a down period of the conference. I'd rather win.

Second point, you have the excuse train talking points down.

Third point, I disagree with your definition of "clear misses". If you are looking to win a conference championship, there are a ton of misses. Ever to Reach .500!

Final point. Odio is not a good basketball player. He works hard, jumps high, and shouldn't be on an ACC roster.


OK, so even though what we've been talking about all along has been first to get back into the tournament by next season, we've now moved the goalposts to conference champion. I'll take that as a good sign.

Your Odio comment is assinine. Name your clear misses.


No. Attacking a team with 4 conference wins is piling on. Their performance is shitty enough on its own. Your mental gymnastics to defend a mediocre roster with no depth and a sub-.500 record caught my attention, but I am not interested in turning this into another 5 page thread on 3 point make percentage versus take percentage as a measure of defense.


So to recap, you created your own standard of good recruiting. It is indefensible when compared to reality. When faced with the task of trying to comport your tortured standard with reality you took your ball and went home.

Its better than last year and your blanket "players don't really improve as they play more" stance.


Okay. You're a legend in your own mind.

And nice try with your Argument tactic #3 - Lure guy in with retarded misquote. I'll pass.

P and S: Reality = this team sucks. Reality proven by record.
Last edited by twballgame9 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"We remind everyone that Boston College fired a perfectly good coach because he went on a job interview, and deserves all of this." Spencer Hall
User avatar
twballgame9
BC Guy
 
Posts: 34343
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 2489

PreviousNext

Return to Conte Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Untitled document