claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
bchockey04 {l Wrote}:JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
He got a good drive to the basket and probably could have gotten a foul call. I'm ok with that.
JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
JimDog90 {l Wrote}:bchockey04 {l Wrote}:JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
He got a good drive to the basket and probably could have gotten a foul call. I'm ok with that.
Donahue has been quoted that Rahon is his "go to" guy at the end of games, so that play was unfortunately predictable. Rahon is a good player and makes good decisions, BUT Hanlan is a better finisher. The fact that Rahon was having his WORST game as an Eagle didn't change Donahue's thinking. I found that frustrating.
bchockey04 {l Wrote}:JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
He got a good drive to the basket and probably could have gotten a foul call. I'm ok with that.
bcmurph {l Wrote}:bchockey04 {l Wrote}:JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
He got a good drive to the basket and probably could have gotten a foul call. I'm ok with that.
Yeah...I thought he got hacked and hit with the body on the layup...
Tough game, they looked a little tired in the second half...pretty physical and some inconsistent calls
MattTheEagle {l Wrote}:That was unfortunate. Wake is a very bad team. We played very sloppy. Rahon couldn't make anything. The one good thing is it looks like Lonnie Jackson is back.
footer20 {l Wrote}:bcmurph {l Wrote}:bchockey04 {l Wrote}:JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
He got a good drive to the basket and probably could have gotten a foul call. I'm ok with that.
Yeah...I thought he got hacked and hit with the body on the layup...
Tough game, they looked a little tired in the second half...pretty physical and some inconsistent calls
Watch the replay. The first defender tried to poke it loose from behind and wrapped him. Rahon stumbled a little, and remember we were in the double bonus. It was pretty blatant but the refs swallowed their whistles all game and certainly did on that possession. Still think the ball HAS to be in Hanlons hands
JimDog90 {l Wrote}:footer20 {l Wrote}:bcmurph {l Wrote}:bchockey04 {l Wrote}:JimDog90 {l Wrote}:claver2010 {l Wrote}:Have to be high screen and roll w Hanlan & Anderson?
Donahue has too much man-love for Rahon. He's their "go-to" guy? WTF.
He got a good drive to the basket and probably could have gotten a foul call. I'm ok with that.
Yeah...I thought he got hacked and hit with the body on the layup...
Tough game, they looked a little tired in the second half...pretty physical and some inconsistent calls
Watch the replay. The first defender tried to poke it loose from behind and wrapped him. Rahon stumbled a little, and remember we were in the double bonus. It was pretty blatant but the refs swallowed their whistles all game and certainly did on that possession. Still think the ball HAS to be in Hanlons hands
Yeah, I like Rahon as a player- a lot, but I don't think he's the best finisher on the team (both Anderson and Hanlan are better-although Anderson needs someone to get him the ball), and he's not going to get that call. Refs are not going to call body contact, esp. at the end of a game for the road team. The reverse layups and other finishes Rahon got against UNH and the like are fools-gold in ACC play. Of course the ball is in Rahon's hands because he makes good decisions, better than Hanlan ( who turned the ball over on the previous possession- by over passing).
Still, glad the team competed....I thought WF had the best two players on the floor, and BC almost overcame that. Looking forward to WF coming to Conte on 2/13.
TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:I've never seen a team get more calls than the eagles did tonight. Sadly, it didn't matter
BCEaglesFan {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:I've never seen a team get more calls than the eagles did tonight. Sadly, it didn't matter
Umm....you didn't watch the same game I did did you?
BCEaglesFan {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:I've never seen a team get more calls than the eagles did tonight. Sadly, it didn't matter
Umm....you didn't watch the same game I did did you?
BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:BCEaglesFan {l Wrote}:TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:I've never seen a team get more calls than the eagles did tonight. Sadly, it didn't matter
Umm....you didn't watch the same game I did did you?
sounds like me and TRE watched the same game and you watched a re-run of a different game.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], lobstalova and 87 guests