Page 2 of 5

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:41 pm
by Hunta518
I don't think Ryan Anderson has ever got an And-1... Jesus

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:42 pm
by joeyfenn
Down 26-24. If we make our open shots and free throws we could be handling them by 5-10

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:46 pm
by claver2010
Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:48 pm
by pick6pedro
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:49 pm
by Hunta518
Anderson at a solid 33.333333333% from the line

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:50 pm
by pick6pedro
Heck finishes that play he started and I would have laid off him for a full couple minutes.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:50 pm
by eepstein0
If we could finish And 1's and make FTs this would be a blowout already

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:51 pm
by joeyfenn
Ryan Anderson 2-7 at the line. There isnt even a student section distracting him. What the hell are we gonna do later in conference play?

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:57 pm
by eepstein0
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:04 pm
by eagle9903
9 missed fts. christ.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:14 pm
by pick6pedro
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:15 pm
by Shaddix
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.


They have what it takes to be winners. I don't know why anyone would think they wouldn't?

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:18 pm
by apbc12
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.


They have what it takes to be winners. I don't know why anyone would think they wouldn't?


Because they don't win.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:18 pm
by pick6pedro
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.


They have what it takes to be winners. I don't know why anyone would think they wouldn't?


I'm one of the more optimistic posters when it comes to this team...but have they shown it? The answer is no, they have not.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:18 pm
by joemack13
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Not to rocketcar you, but where are you watching from?

Probably means it's on TV around you


ah, fuck i'm at work.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:21 pm
by Hunta518
Way to stop that run there, gettin their hands in a lot of passing lanes

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:21 pm
by Shaddix
apbc12 {l Wrote}:
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.


They have what it takes to be winners. I don't know why anyone would think they wouldn't?


Because they don't win.


8-6 going into this game...

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:21 pm
by joeyfenn
49-38 BC, If these boys can close out strong I will have tons of confidence going forward.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:22 pm
by pick6pedro
Did I hear right? VT has 6 scholarship players suited up tonight? Shaddix of course will claim this 2nd road win (if) of the last 2 seasons means they are officially over that hump.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:22 pm
by BCEagles25
This team makes me glad to be an Eagles fan. I'm also glad that I'm not the guy who said Lonnie and Heck aren't even worthy of being a ACC role players.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:24 pm
by pick6pedro
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
apbc12 {l Wrote}:
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.


They have what it takes to be winners. I don't know why anyone would think they wouldn't?


Because they don't win.


8-6 going into this game...


First off, that's extremely unimpressive through non-league play. Second, you musta missed the "in this league" part.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:24 pm
by eepstein0
BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:This team makes me glad to be an Eagles fan. I'm also glad that I'm not the guy who said Lonnie and Heck aren't even worthy of being a ACC role players.


Heckmann is a turnover machine. Jackson is a good 4 th guard.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:26 pm
by pick6pedro
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:This team makes me glad to be an Eagles fan. I'm also glad that I'm not the guy who said Lonnie and Heck aren't even worthy of being a ACC role players.


Heckmann is a turnover machine. Jackson is a good 4 th guard.


If neither were tied so closely to the immediate success of this team, I'd be far more proud.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:26 pm
by Hunta518
Damn Hanlan pushes the ball

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:26 pm
by Shaddix
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Did I hear right? VT has 6 scholarship players suited up tonight? Shaddix of course will claim this 2nd road win (if) of the last 2 seasons means they are officially over that hump.


That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying without that our team has played good ball, enough to get the job done with 95% of scoring coming from underclassmen. Did you think BC would be Clemson, VT, and a ranked FSU last year? Hell no, but they raised their game and they did. They are playing decent ball now.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:30 pm
by eepstein0
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:This team makes me glad to be an Eagles fan. I'm also glad that I'm not the guy who said Lonnie and Heck aren't even worthy of being a ACC role players.


Heckmann is a turnover machine. Jackson is a good 4 th guard.


If neither were tied so closely to the immediate success of this team, I'd be far more proud.


Solid last 4 min. Lonnie throwing up bricks and Heckmann taking stupid shots.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:31 pm
by pick6pedro
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Did I hear right? VT has 6 scholarship players suited up tonight? Shaddix of course will claim this 2nd road win (if) of the last 2 seasons means they are officially over that hump.


That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying without that our team has played good ball, enough to get the job done with 95% of scoring coming from underclassmen. Did you think BC would be Clemson, VT, and a ranked FSU last year? Hell no, but they raised their game and they did. They are playing decent ball now.


Your main problem is that you take their high end of achievement as some kind of average. The horrible losses even those wins out and put them in a place far below their max potential over the course of a full season. Do I believe they can progress and surprise a lot of teams and that future years can bring a higher upside? Yes. Have they shown they can win in a top hoops league? No.

Just be a little more realistic and less cheerleader and you wouldn't have to go through this over and over.

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:32 pm
by Shaddix
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
apbc12 {l Wrote}:
Shaddix {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
eepstein0 {l Wrote}:
pick6pedro {l Wrote}:
claver2010 {l Wrote}:Hanlan is great at getting to the line.

The D is so much better than last year. Now just need to make some open shots


And box out for a full second longer. And make FTs. And not leave your feet with nowhere to go. And, well you get the point.


I don't think they're as far off as you think they are.

It's not great but last year they'd be down big already


Better than last year versus what it takes to be winners in this league...huge gap there.


They have what it takes to be winners. I don't know why anyone would think they wouldn't?


Because they don't win.


8-6 going into this game...


First off, that's extremely unimpressive through non-league play. Second, you musta missed the "in this league" part.


So you'd prefer the 5-10 they went going into conference play last year to the 8-5 this year?

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:32 pm
by Mike_S
Working at home today, so have been able to glance at the game off-and-on.

Team looks good again -- but it seems like every time I look, Heckman throws up an ill-advised shot. When he just stays in control and passes the ball conservatively, the team is so much better...

Re: VT Test

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:32 pm
by Hunta518
And suddenly it's a 4 point game