EagleOutsider.com

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Oh it's on the coach for recruiting crappy players. Donahue is good at coaching, but a joke recruiting.

I wouldn't buy any property yet Steve, this isn't going to last much longer

Think it's more than fair to wonder whether Donahue is the answer

I'm having more questions every game I watch

Donahue isn't the answer unless he gets an ace recruiter.

Unless he coaches up these players/drastically improve the 2013 class he won't be here long enough to reap the benefits even if he hires an ace recruiter

Steve Donahue is an epic fraud. Way to go, Gene. Thanks for ruining BC in the only sports that matter.

branchinator {l Wrote}:Steve Donahue is an epic fraud. Way to go, Gene. Thanks for ruining BC in the only sports that matter.

THIS!

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:Oh it's on the coach for recruiting crappy players. Donahue is good at coaching, but a joke recruiting.

I wouldn't buy any property yet Steve, this isn't going to last much longer

Think it's more than fair to wonder whether Donahue is the answer

I'm having more questions every game I watch

Donahue isn't the answer unless he gets an ace recruiter.

Unless he coaches up these players/drastically improve the 2013 class he won't be here long enough to reap the benefits even if he hires an ace recruiter

He has this year and next probably, if he makes the NCAA next year he gets another. If not, I am sure North Dakota State has a grad assistant we can hire cheap.

i hear what you're saying, but put me on record as saying this will never happen. how the hell are we gonna scrap a .500 record in teh acc next year, especially with nd pitt and cuse coming in.

after all these losses hes gotta show me why its worth keeping him around for next year.

commavegarage {l Wrote}:i hear what you're saying, but put me on record as saying this will never happen. how the hell are we gonna scrap a .500 record in teh acc next year, especially with nd pitt and cuse coming in.

after all these losses hes gotta show me why its worth keeping him around for next year.

Unless we see something different in the next three months, it's time to move on.

Perfect ending to a perfect fucking day.

joemack13 {l Wrote}:So we have 7 scholarship players that got minutes in the first half including eddie odio and van nest? No offense to van nest, I just thought it made it sound more profound. So clifford is hurt, do we have 6 scholarships open for next year?

I must admit the defense is they need help.
The Don would be wise to use the bench and those scoli's to get the best guys on the court. Handlin won't make the pass to Anderson yet on the pick and roll. Rahon played with Shabazz Muhamed and looks for his 4. He wants that ball to go inside.
The Don needs to start finding some wins.

Steve Donahue after the game:

"Can't say experience anymore. I'm done with that. Defense was poor."-Donahue when asked about experience being a factor tonight

I missed the game how do you lose a game shooting 58% from the field?
Danya Abram thinks the players are soft. Can the coach change this mentality?

wildcat81 {l Wrote}:I missed the game how do you lose a game shooting 58% from the field?
Danya Abram thinks the players are soft. Can the coach change this mentality?

Not to go all great reverend on you, but look at our team. It's a bunch of frail cracker ass crackers.

I was sitting in the upperdeck last night and Donahue put out a line up of: walkon, Rahon, Heckman, Odio, & Van Nest. Besides all the dinosaurs in the chairbacks who I'm sure loved that lineup, I asked BCI's basketball writer are we still even trying to pretend we're in the ACC with that shit?

We're 3 recruiting classes into Donahue's era and we're still giving 20 minutes a night to Odio, 10 to some walk on, and Caudill can't get off the bench

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

wildcat81 {l Wrote}:I missed the game how do you lose a game shooting 58% from the field?
Danya Abram thinks the players are soft. Can the coach change this mentality?

Not to go all great reverend on you, but look at our team. It's a bunch of frail cracker ass crackers.

I was sitting in the upperdeck last night and Donahue put out a line up of: walkon, Rahon, Heckman, Odio, & Van Nest. Besides all the dinosaurs in the chairbacks who I'm sure loved that lineup, I asked BCI's basketball writer are we still even trying to pretend we're in the ACC with that shit?

We're 3 recruiting classes into Donahue's era and we're still giving 20 minutes a night to Odio, 10 to some walk on, and Caudill can't get off the bench

Odio doesn't get 20 min per night, he only gets those when Clifford is out.

He's gotten around 20 minutes in half the games this year (Dayton: 18, College of Charleston 17, Auburn 22, Harvard 20)

Nope, they don't need Jordan Daniels.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Nope, they don't need Jordan Daniels.

Daniels would make little difference. You're pretending he's all ACC or something. In truth he's a low mid-major player

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Nope, they don't need Jordan Daniels.

Daniels would make little difference. You're pretending he's all ACC or something. In truth he's a low mid-major player

He wouldn't have hurt, that's for sure. Now you have John Cahill 2 coming off the bench for minutes.

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Nope, they don't need Jordan Daniels.

Daniels would make little difference. You're pretending he's all ACC or something. In truth he's a low mid-major player

He wouldn't have hurt, that's for sure. Now you have John Cahill 2 coming off the bench for minutes.

Bingo. And I will certainly take another performance like he had against FSU as a mid major player.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Nope, they don't need Jordan Daniels.

Daniels would make little difference. You're pretending he's all ACC or something. In truth he's a low mid-major player

He wouldn't have hurt, that's for sure. Now you have John Cahill 2 coming off the bench for minutes.

Bingo. And I will certainly take another performance like he had against FSU as a mid major player.

He had exactly one good game. He's going to land at a WCC school. Then I'll laugh. It's a shame Lonnie Jackson didn't follow him

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Nope, they don't need Jordan Daniels.

Daniels would make little difference. You're pretending he's all ACC or something. In truth he's a low mid-major player

He wouldn't have hurt, that's for sure. Now you have John Cahill 2 coming off the bench for minutes.

Saying he's better than a walk-on does not prove your point

what youre missing epstein is a low level division 1 player is better than a division 3 player. we have division 3 players getting a LOT of minutes. in. year. 3.

commavegarage {l Wrote}:what youre missing epstein is a low level division 1 player is better than a division 3 player. we have division 3 players getting a LOT of minutes. in. year. 3.

I said he'd make little difference, not no difference. Does BC win last night with Daniels? No chance.

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

commavegarage {l Wrote}:what youre missing epstein is a low level division 1 player is better than a division 3 player. we have division 3 players getting a LOT of minutes. in. year. 3.

I said he'd make little difference, not no difference. Does BC win last night with Daniels? No chance.

No shit but we're playing some BC high walk on at this stage

Opposed to ACC caliber vs not, we're at the stage where it should be D1 or not

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:

commavegarage {l Wrote}:what youre missing epstein is a low level division 1 player is better than a division 3 player. we have division 3 players getting a LOT of minutes. in. year. 3.

I said he'd make little difference, not no difference. Does BC win last night with Daniels? No chance.

No shit but we're playing some BC high walk on at this stage

Opposed to ACC caliber vs not, we're at the stage where it should be D1 or not

Oh I agree 100%. He was trying to prove a point by playing Jacobs.

His point sucks, as does he. Maybe he shouldn't run off D1 players. Done with this douche.