EagleOutsider.com

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:If BC would not like to finish in dead last, they better get their ass in gear these next 3 games

BCEaglesFan {l Wrote}:innocentbystander..NU just lost to 5-25 ODU...yikes...then again UVA lost to them too...and UVA is really good....

Globe {l Wrote}:When freshman David Walker hoisted a 3-pointer that missed, Coen pulled all five starters with 18:10 to go.

“That was the point where the game was getting out of hand,’’ said Smith, who finished with 19 points on 6-for-13 shooting. “The people who came in did a great job and picked us up. We sat on the bench, meanwhile, and refocused ourselves and tried to make a run at it.’’

Northeastern’s bench chipped in 21 points, getting 6 apiece from Demetrius Pollard, Marco Banegas-Flores, and Zach Stahl, whose strong layup off a pretty feed from Banegas-Flores cut it to 66-58 with 4:03 to go.

“We tried to set the tempo, but really they set the tempo for us,’’ Lee said of Northeastern’s bench. “When we got back in there, we gave it everything we had.’’

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

hey tre,

Miami and three-fourths of Tobaccoroad are in the tourney. confirmed!

there WILL be five. the winner of the UVa-Maryland game is in the tourney.

there probably wont be six unless Maryland loses to UVa and then winds up winning the ACC tourney outright. then there will be six. but there WILL be at least five (like I said, like you timestamped)

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

hey tre,

Miami and three-fourths of Tobaccoroad are in the tourney. confirmed!

there WILL be five. the winner of the UVa-Maryland game is in the tourney.

there probably wont be six unless Maryland loses to UVa and then winds up winning the ACC tourney outright. then there will be six. but there WILL be at least five (like I said, like you timestamped)

I'm not sold that UMD is in with a win over UVA. Cal on the other hand...

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

who said that?

i think Maryland is bi-polar, not awesome (beat Duke but lose to BC?)

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

hey tre,

Miami and three-fourths of Tobaccoroad are in the tourney. confirmed!

there WILL be five. the winner of the UVa-Maryland game is in the tourney.

there probably wont be six unless Maryland loses to UVa and then winds up winning the ACC tourney outright. then there will be six. but there WILL be at least five (like I said, like you timestamped)

I'm not sold that UMD is in with a win over UVA. Cal on the other hand...

the NCAA is not going to send the #3 rebounding team in the country, to the NIT, if they are a 21 win ACC team.

UVa could waste FSU, lose to Md, and still have a slim hope of making the NCAA tourney (if they win their first round game in the ACC tourney.) unless you are from Blacksburg, 22 wins seems to be the magical number.

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

hey tre,

Miami and three-fourths of Tobaccoroad are in the tourney. confirmed!

there WILL be five. the winner of the UVa-Maryland game is in the tourney.

there probably wont be six unless Maryland loses to UVa and then winds up winning the ACC tourney outright. then there will be six. but there WILL be at least five (like I said, like you timestamped)

I'm not sold that UMD is in with a win over UVA. Cal on the other hand...

the NCAA is not going to send the #3 rebounding team in the country, to the NIT, if they are a 21 win ACC team.

UVa could waste FSU, lose to Md, and still have a slim hope of making the NCAA tourney (if they win their first round game in the ACC tourney.) unless you are from Blacksburg, 22 wins seems to be the magical number.

The NCAA is not going to give a pile of fece-laden buffet items what UMD's national rebounding ranking is. Great so UMD has 21 wins and gets smoked on an off night by Clemson/Wake. They're now looking at an RPI in the 70s with like 2 strong wins and two bad losses. The exact type of profile that has been left out lately.

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

who said that?

i think Maryland is bi-polar, not awesome (beat Duke but lose to BC?)

Christ, no space, keep up.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

hey tre,

Miami and three-fourths of Tobaccoroad are in the tourney. confirmed!

there WILL be five. the winner of the UVa-Maryland game is in the tourney.

there probably wont be six unless Maryland loses to UVa and then winds up winning the ACC tourney outright. then there will be six. but there WILL be at least five (like I said, like you timestamped)

I'm not sold that UMD is in with a win over UVA. Cal on the other hand...

the NCAA is not going to send the #3 rebounding team in the country, to the NIT, if they are a 21 win ACC team.

UVa could waste FSU, lose to Md, and still have a slim hope of making the NCAA tourney (if they win their first round game in the ACC tourney.) unless you are from Blacksburg, 22 wins seems to be the magical number.

The NCAA is not going to give a pile of fece-laden buffet items what UMD's national rebounding ranking is. Great so UMD has 21 wins and gets smoked on an off night by Clemson/Wake. They're now looking at an RPI in the 70s with like 2 strong wins and two bad losses. The exact type of profile that has been left out lately.

yeah, but all the conference tournaments will be won by the regular season champs so there won't be any auto-bids that push out other qualifying at-larges

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:UVa beat Duke.

The ACC sends at least 5 to the NCAA tourney. Timestamp this.

done. this will soon be added to the list of "things that noknowledge declares as absolutely happening that didn't happen and never had a chance at happening"

what do i get if I'm right?

Why does Mr. I-Hate-Entitlement want a cookie every damn time he hits something ona dartboard?

he's recently finished the "how to always be right" course instructed by our own homojs. you know how i can tell? he's doing it wrong

hey tre,

Miami and three-fourths of Tobaccoroad are in the tourney. confirmed!

there WILL be five. the winner of the UVa-Maryland game is in the tourney.

there probably wont be six unless Maryland loses to UVa and then winds up winning the ACC tourney outright. then there will be six. but there WILL be at least five (like I said, like you timestamped)

I'm not sold that UMD is in with a win over UVA. Cal on the other hand...

the NCAA is not going to send the #3 rebounding team in the country, to the NIT, if they are a 21 win ACC team.

UVa could waste FSU, lose to Md, and still have a slim hope of making the NCAA tourney (if they win their first round game in the ACC tourney.) unless you are from Blacksburg, 22 wins seems to be the magical number.

The NCAA is not going to give a pile of fece-laden buffet items what UMD's national rebounding ranking is. Great so UMD has 21 wins and gets smoked on an off night by Clemson/Wake. They're now looking at an RPI in the 70s with like 2 strong wins and two bad losses. The exact type of profile that has been left out lately.

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:Oh shit, I went over 10,000 posts. What a loser.

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:right now, MD is out and UVa is in. I give you that. but Duke also has a bad loss. Miami might be the best team in the AC and they got smoked by fucking Wake Forest. That will not keep Miami from going to the show.

I'm just saying five ACC teams are in and if Md beats UVa, Md will (most likely) be one of the five. if Md beats UVa AND wins their first round game in the ACC tourney (they should) then they will definately be in...

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:right now, MD is out and UVa is in. I give you that. but Duke also has a bad loss. Miami might be the best team in the AC and they got smoked by fucking Wake Forest. That will not keep Miami from going to the show.

I'm just saying five ACC teams are in and if Md beats UVa, Md will (most likely) be one of the five. if Md beats UVa AND wins their first round game in the ACC tourney (they should) then they will definately be in...

Nothing says "I don't know what I'm talking about" like comparing the effects of bad losses on top 10 teams to the effect on 10 loss teams.

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:right now, MD is out and UVa is in. I give you that. but Duke also has a bad loss. Miami might be the best team in the AC and they got smoked by fucking Wake Forest. That will not keep Miami from going to the show.

I'm just saying five ACC teams are in and if Md beats UVa, Md will (most likely) be one of the five. if Md beats UVa AND wins their first round game in the ACC tourney (they should) then they will definately be in...

Nothing says "I don't know what I'm talking about" like comparing the effects of bad losses on top 10 teams to the effect on 10 loss teams.

is it that linear? really?

you don't think there is just a little bit of subjectivity when picking 64 (or 66, depending on how you look at it) teams?

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

who said that?

i think Maryland is bi-polar, not awesome (beat Duke but lose to BC?)

Christ, no space, keep up.

Believe that was during his self imposed timeout

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

who said that?

i think Maryland is bi-polar, not awesome (beat Duke but lose to BC?)

Christ, no space, keep up.

Believe that was during his self imposed timeout

Fair, but I have been harping on it for months now.

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

who said that?

i think Maryland is bi-polar, not awesome (beat Duke but lose to BC?)

Christ, no space, keep up.

Believe that was during his self imposed timeout

Fair, but I have been harping on it for months now.

teddy, you harp on a lot of things. people turn a deaf ear to what you are harping on after a while

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

claver2010 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

innocentbystander {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:Wait, I though MD was awesome because of their moral victory over #3 Kentucky?

who said that?

i think Maryland is bi-polar, not awesome (beat Duke but lose to BC?)

Christ, no space, keep up.

Believe that was during his self imposed timeout

Fair, but I have been harping on it for months now.

teddy, you harp on a lot of things. people turn a deaf ear to what you are harping on after a while

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:All the teams you're debating are horrible. Watched the entire Maryland game last night that team is a struggle

eepstein0 {l Wrote}:All the teams you're debating are horrible. Watched the entire Maryland game last night that team is a struggle

pick6pedro {l Wrote}:I'm officially on the bandwagon with the La Salle Explorers. I know a ton of people who went there and it's great to see them so excited.