EagleOutsider.com

branchinator {l Wrote}:Huckaby and Curley didn't do jack shit in the NBA. Eisley was the only NBA player of note from that squad. I still maintain that the 2005-2006 squad was the most talented team BC will ever field. Of course, they also underachieved. This year's team won't be as talented but they may go farther. You just never know with college hoops.

talon {l Wrote}:Better Team ≠ Better Players

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

branchinator {l Wrote}:Believe me, that 2005-2006 team was my favorite BC basketball team of all-time. They were really good and should have been at least an Elite Eight team given the talent. They had 3 NBA players and at least 3 more guys who are playing in Europe. I don't see the same level of talent on this year's team. Rakim Sanders most likely will be an NBA player. Other than that, there isn't anyone else who is close to being an NBA player. And that's fine since having NBA players doesn't guarantee you squat in the tournament. Next year, if we get Odom, Noreen, and Heslip, and they all turn out to be good players, then a serious Final Four run could be a possibility. To me, a lot of it hinges on whether or not Paris is ready for primetime.

Jackson + Sanders + Paris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hinnant + Marshall + Rice as a freshman

There is no doubt that the front court was better on the other team. Like I said, frontcourt play doesn't matter as much. If Southern, Raji, Trapani, Paris and bench do their jobs, this will be a better team, even though it only has one guy that is a can't miss NBA talent.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

branchinator {l Wrote}:Believe me, that 2005-2006 team was my favorite BC basketball team of all-time. They were really good and should have been at least an Elite Eight team given the talent. They had 3 NBA players and at least 3 more guys who are playing in Europe. I don't see the same level of talent on this year's team. Rakim Sanders most likely will be an NBA player. Other than that, there isn't anyone else who is close to being an NBA player. And that's fine since having NBA players doesn't guarantee you squat in the tournament. Next year, if we get Odom, Noreen, and Heslip, and they all turn out to be good players, then a serious Final Four run could be a possibility. To me, a lot of it hinges on whether or not Paris is ready for primetime.

Jackson + Sanders + Paris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hinnant + Marshall + Rice as a freshman

There is no doubt that the front court was better on the other team. Like I said, frontcourt play doesn't matter as much. If Southern, Raji, Trapani, Paris and bench do their jobs, this will be a better team, even though it only has one guy that is a can't miss NBA talent.

I don't know what's more comical....saying this team is better than the 2006 team, or saying that Sanders is "can't miss NBA talent".

the answer: saying that gene will open up the checkbook to hire a prestigious basketball coach based on gene's other tenured hires.

i'd like to reference out the case of chris crane vs. cesspool can't possibly be worse in pointing out that oj doesn't know what the hell he's talking about 99.9% of the time and frequently abondons previous arguments to fit his new fact patterns into new audiences

Eagledom {l Wrote}:I won't address your other comment, because it doesn't have anything to do with me.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

bobcarrington {l Wrote}:We should probably invoke this thread from time to time to keep ourselves humble.

what's this "we" shit, first post boy? you got momoney and teddy in your pocket?

bobcarrington {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

bobcarrington {l Wrote}:We should probably invoke this thread from time to time to keep ourselves humble.

what's this "we" shit, first post boy? you got momoney and teddy in your pocket?

Wow, you guys are kind of harsh here, no? My goal was not to piss people off.

By "we" I only meant those of us who thought BC would be pretty good this year -- or at least a lot better than they've shown. I don't know if you thought they would suck, but I didn't.

But I'll shut up.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

branchinator {l Wrote}:Believe me, that 2005-2006 team was my favorite BC basketball team of all-time. They were really good and should have been at least an Elite Eight team given the talent. They had 3 NBA players and at least 3 more guys who are playing in Europe. I don't see the same level of talent on this year's team. Rakim Sanders most likely will be an NBA player. Other than that, there isn't anyone else who is close to being an NBA player. And that's fine since having NBA players doesn't guarantee you squat in the tournament. Next year, if we get Odom, Noreen, and Heslip, and they all turn out to be good players, then a serious Final Four run could be a possibility. To me, a lot of it hinges on whether or not Paris is ready for primetime.

Jackson + Sanders + Paris >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hinnant + Marshall + Rice as a freshman

There is no doubt that the front court was better on the other team. Like I said, frontcourt play doesn't matter as much. If Southern, Raji, Trapani, Paris and bench do their jobs, this will be a better team, even though it only has one guy that is a can't miss NBA talent.

I don't know what's more comical....saying this team is better than the 2006 team, or saying that Sanders is "can't miss NBA talent".

the answer: saying that gene will open up the checkbook to hire a prestigious basketball coach based on gene's other tenured hires.

i'd like to reference out the case of chris crane vs. cesspool can't possibly be worse in pointing out that oj doesn't know what the hell he's talking about 99.9% of the time and frequently abondons previous arguments to fit his new fact patterns into new audiences

Douchebag - nobody has any fucking clue who Gene would interview for the hoops job. I don't claim to know his potential list of candidates. HJS does, because he has an agenda. I won't address your other comment, because it doesn't have anything to do with me.

oj - please do not belittle the intelligence of this board (any more than you already do through your posts) by claiming to not be the person who posts as eagledomino12 on ea and formerly posted as oj1969 on ei. your efforts at denying either of these facts is more pathetic than homojs hating on gene because he used to hump homojs's mom on parents weekend

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:
i have never denied posting as Domino12

actually, yes you did. much like all your other "statements" this one is proven wrong with quotes you've previously made. i'm interested in how you weasel out of this one, oj

Eagledom {l Wrote}:I do not post as a different name on another board. Now as far as being a "merryman"...

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:
i have never denied posting as Domino12

actually, yes you did. much like all your other "statements" this one is proven wrong with quotes you've previously made. i'm interested in how you weasel out of this one, oj

Eagledom {l Wrote}:I do not post as a different name on another board. Now as far as being a "merryman"...

you changed your tune later (when you were presented with the undeniable fact that you post from the same ip address as eagledomino12). i'd like to suggest that you change your tune as it relates to the whole oj thing (unless you'd like to be proven wrong and a liar yet again)

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:
i have never denied posting as Domino12

actually, yes you did. much like all your other "statements" this one is proven wrong with quotes you've previously made. i'm interested in how you weasel out of this one, oj

Eagledom {l Wrote}:I do not post as a different name on another board. Now as far as being a "merryman"...

you changed your tune later (when you were presented with the undeniable fact that you post from the same ip address as eagledomino12). i'd like to suggest that you change your tune as it relates to the whole oj thing (unless you'd like to be proven wrong and a liar yet again)

that was in response to "OJ" comments. I have been very clear about posting as Domino on EA.

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:
i have never denied posting as Domino12

actually, yes you did. much like all your other "statements" this one is proven wrong with quotes you've previously made. i'm interested in how you weasel out of this one, oj

Eagledom {l Wrote}:I do not post as a different name on another board. Now as far as being a "merryman"...

you changed your tune later (when you were presented with the undeniable fact that you post from the same ip address as eagledomino12). i'd like to suggest that you change your tune as it relates to the whole oj thing (unless you'd like to be proven wrong and a liar yet again)

that was in response to "OJ" comments. I have been very clear about posting as Domino on EA.

i figured you would see it that way. interstingly enough, a few posts above the one previously quoted... talon accused you of being both eagledomino12 AND oj. your response would be read by many as if you were denying both (you know, since you said "I do not post as a different name on another board" - which would include eagledomino12... since its a different name on a different board)

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

talon {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

talon {l Wrote}:

Endless Mike {l Wrote}:Where did this fucking retard get the idea that being unhappy with a loss = quitting on the team?

pinhead congratulated VT for beating us before Matt Ryan came back. Domino has some sort of mission against anybody ever saying anything bad about BC ever since.

But wait....I thought I was OJ?

you being Domino12 on EA and you being OJ1969 on EI are not mutually exclusive.

I am EVERYONE! CONSPIRACY AGAINST TALON!!!!

listen, oj... we have ip address that confirm you as both. it's time to stop the charade and embrace your inner oj just like you (allegedly) embraced your inner domino12.

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:Eagledom was exposed as OJ on many occasions, however, the most telling was on a thread where Eagledom called out Teddy about Teddy's views on Sanders. It had never been discussed on EO only on EI where Teddy and OJ battled it out. I can find the exact thread but I am lazy.

The bottom line is that Eagledom is OJ and he sucks.

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:Eagledom was exposed as OJ on many occasions, however, the most telling was on a thread where Eagledom called out Teddy about Teddy's views on Sanders. It had never been discussed on EO only on EI where Teddy and OJ battled it out. I can find the exact thread but I am lazy.

The bottom line is that Eagledom is OJ and he sucks.

I think if you look up a few posts in this very thread you will see that TWB calls Sanders a can't miss NBA player. So you might want to go back to the drawing board.

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:Eagledom was exposed as OJ on many occasions, however, the most telling was on a thread where Eagledom called out Teddy about Teddy's views on Sanders. It had never been discussed on EO only on EI where Teddy and OJ battled it out. I can find the exact thread but I am lazy.

The bottom line is that Eagledom is OJ and he sucks.

I think if you look up a few posts in this very thread you will see that TWB calls Sanders a can't miss NBA player. So you might want to go back to the drawing board.

You are the King of Dicks. I wasn't trying to argue Sanders, I was referring to a post where you slipped up and proved that you are indeed OJ. I apologize because the post was regarding Raji and not Sanders. See for yourself (Please note that after Eagledom was called out, he conveniently disappeared to another thread):

Re: Boston College @ Michigan Game-Thread
by twballgame9 on Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:50 pm

Eagledom wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:
EaglesTalon wrote:
BCEagle74 wrote:
RAJI with best game ever as an Eagle.


I think Raji's career high is 26.


Against who? Probably Marathon Oil.

Good win tonight. Makes up for one of the shit losses - they weren't expected to win this one.


Makes up for one shit loss, but not 2. Keep shitting on raji, though.


I don't need to shit on Raji. There are only 2-3 more weeks before he disappears for the year. That said, good free throw shooting to close out the game though - he clinched it with his 30% shooting at the line.

And if you aren't OJ, douche, you wouldn't know I "shat" on Raji. In truth, I shat on you for saying he was better than Sanders. I haven't passed judgment on his improvement this year - I watched my first 30 minutes of BC hoop tonight. He looked pretty good, other than the 30% FT shooting and the predictable pair of missed layups.

twballgame9
Cushing Hall

Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 67


Private message

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:Eagledom was exposed as OJ on many occasions, however, the most telling was on a thread where Eagledom called out Teddy about Teddy's views on Sanders. It had never been discussed on EO only on EI where Teddy and OJ battled it out. I can find the exact thread but I am lazy.

The bottom line is that Eagledom is OJ and he sucks.

I think if you look up a few posts in this very thread you will see that TWB calls Sanders a can't miss NBA player. So you might want to go back to the drawing board.

You are the King of Dicks. I wasn't trying to argue Sanders, I was referring to a post where you slipped up and proved that you are indeed OJ. I apologize because the post was regarding Raji and not Sanders. See for yourself (Please note that after Eagledom was called out, he conveniently disappeared to another thread):

Re: Boston College @ Michigan Game-Thread
by twballgame9 on Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:50 pm

Eagledom wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:
EaglesTalon wrote:
BCEagle74 wrote:
RAJI with best game ever as an Eagle.


I think Raji's career high is 26.


Against who? Probably Marathon Oil.

Good win tonight. Makes up for one of the shit losses - they weren't expected to win this one.


Makes up for one shit loss, but not 2. Keep shitting on raji, though.


I don't need to shit on Raji. There are only 2-3 more weeks before he disappears for the year. That said, good free throw shooting to close out the game though - he clinched it with his 30% shooting at the line.

And if you aren't OJ, douche, you wouldn't know I "shat" on Raji. In truth, I shat on you for saying he was better than Sanders. I haven't passed judgment on his improvement this year - I watched my first 30 minutes of BC hoop tonight. He looked pretty good, other than the 30% FT shooting and the predictable pair of missed layups.

twballgame9
Cushing Hall

Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 67


Private message

WTF are you talikng about? I called him out for criticizing a guy who had a good game and somehow that means I am OJ? What the fuck does this have to do with the other board? You are an idiot.

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:

Eagledom {l Wrote}:

Cadillac90 {l Wrote}:Eagledom was exposed as OJ on many occasions, however, the most telling was on a thread where Eagledom called out Teddy about Teddy's views on Sanders. It had never been discussed on EO only on EI where Teddy and OJ battled it out. I can find the exact thread but I am lazy.

The bottom line is that Eagledom is OJ and he sucks.

I think if you look up a few posts in this very thread you will see that TWB calls Sanders a can't miss NBA player. So you might want to go back to the drawing board.

You are the King of Dicks. I wasn't trying to argue Sanders, I was referring to a post where you slipped up and proved that you are indeed OJ. I apologize because the post was regarding Raji and not Sanders. See for yourself (Please note that after Eagledom was called out, he conveniently disappeared to another thread):

Re: Boston College @ Michigan Game-Thread
by twballgame9 on Wed Dec 02, 2009 9:50 pm

Eagledom wrote:
twballgame9 wrote:
EaglesTalon wrote:
BCEagle74 wrote:
RAJI with best game ever as an Eagle.


I think Raji's career high is 26.


Against who? Probably Marathon Oil.

Good win tonight. Makes up for one of the shit losses - they weren't expected to win this one.


Makes up for one shit loss, but not 2. Keep shitting on raji, though.


I don't need to shit on Raji. There are only 2-3 more weeks before he disappears for the year. That said, good free throw shooting to close out the game though - he clinched it with his 30% shooting at the line.

And if you aren't OJ, douche, you wouldn't know I "shat" on Raji. In truth, I shat on you for saying he was better than Sanders. I haven't passed judgment on his improvement this year - I watched my first 30 minutes of BC hoop tonight. He looked pretty good, other than the 30% FT shooting and the predictable pair of missed layups.

twballgame9
Cushing Hall

Posts: 2372
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 8:49 am
Karma: 67


Private message

WTF are you talikng about? I called him out for criticizing a guy who had a good game and somehow that means I am OJ? What the fuck does this have to do with the other board? You are an idiot.

The problem with that is that Teddy hadn't mentioned word one about Raji throughout the entire thread. You brought up the "shitting on Raji" because you, OJ, and Teddy used to argue about that on Scout all the time. You are a dumbass.

EaglesTalon {l Wrote}:can you tell us more about how you got banned from EI and deleted from the entire scout.com network?

you have to admit, that for someone who claimed to just read the articles and never really posted that much, it's kind of hard to believe that you'd be banned from EI, even though you never posted that much. And it's even harder to believe that you were deleted from the entire scout.com network and can't even post on any of the other hundred college teams' message board.

Your continued evasion of this makes you look more and more like a liar.

EaglesTalon {l Wrote}:

EaglesTalon {l Wrote}:can you tell us more about how you got banned from EI and deleted from the entire scout.com network?

you have to admit, that for someone who claimed to just read the articles and never really posted that much, it's kind of hard to believe that you'd be banned from EI, even though you never posted that much. And it's even harder to believe that you were deleted from the entire scout.com network and can't even post on any of the other hundred college teams' message board.

Your continued evasion of this makes you look more and more like a liar.

no comment?