EagleOutsider.com

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:The women's hoops title game will get more press.

you do know the reason why ESPN cares so much about that game is because they are broadcasting it, right?

Umm, they are broadcasting the Frozen Four as well.

I'm not saying it will get the coverage of women's ball, but what I am saying is that if the NCAAW game was broadcasted elsewhere, ESPN would not be talking about it quite as much as they are now. which is... quite often. (the game being tonight does help)

and the same would be true of the frozen four.

it's amazing you are able to figure out how to get dressed in the morning, much less get a computer turned on

ugh.

I said nothing about the Frozen Four. I did not compare the Frozen Four's press coverage to lady's hoops coverage. that is where you are misreading.

Ron's (or his Stones) comment was stating how big the women's college game is (also that it overshadows the Frozen Four, which I agree with, but I was not addressing that.) I am saying "no, it's not as big as it seems, it's just being marketed properly."

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:The women's hoops title game will get more press.

you do know the reason why ESPN cares so much about that game is because they are broadcasting it, right?

Umm, they are broadcasting the Frozen Four as well.

I'm not saying it will get the coverage of women's ball, but what I am saying is that if the NCAAW game was broadcasted elsewhere, ESPN would not be talking about it quite as much as they are now. which is... quite often. (the game being tonight does help)

and the same would be true of the frozen four.

it's amazing you are able to figure out how to get dressed in the morning, much less get a computer turned on

ugh.

I said nothing about the Frozen Four. I did not compare the Frozen Four's press coverage to lady's hoops coverage. that is where you are misreading.

The original point to which you responded was that the Title IX Championship would get more press than Frozen Four.

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:The women's hoops title game will get more press.

you do know the reason why ESPN cares so much about that game is because they are broadcasting it, right?

Umm, they are broadcasting the Frozen Four as well.

I'm not saying it will get the coverage of women's ball, but what I am saying is that if the NCAAW game was broadcasted elsewhere, ESPN would not be talking about it quite as much as they are now. which is... quite often. (the game being tonight does help)

and the same would be true of the frozen four.

it's amazing you are able to figure out how to get dressed in the morning, much less get a computer turned on

ugh.

I said nothing about the Frozen Four. I did not compare the Frozen Four's press coverage to lady's hoops coverage. that is where you are misreading.

but you said it in response to yukon's stones comparison of coverage of the nag hoops game (which, as a thinly veiled yukon fan he totally loves) and the frozen four. if your message was not responding that the only reason that the nag hoops was getting coverage (and more coverage at that) was because of its position on espn then you are bad at repsonding to post, logic AND socializing with women

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

TobaccoRoadEagle {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

twballgame9 {l Wrote}:

BCEagles25 {l Wrote}:

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:The women's hoops title game will get more press.

you do know the reason why ESPN cares so much about that game is because they are broadcasting it, right?

Umm, they are broadcasting the Frozen Four as well.

I'm not saying it will get the coverage of women's ball, but what I am saying is that if the NCAAW game was broadcasted elsewhere, ESPN would not be talking about it quite as much as they are now. which is... quite often. (the game being tonight does help)

and the same would be true of the frozen four.

it's amazing you are able to figure out how to get dressed in the morning, much less get a computer turned on

ugh.

I said nothing about the Frozen Four. I did not compare the Frozen Four's press coverage to lady's hoops coverage. that is where you are misreading.

The original point to which you responded was that the Title IX Championship would get more press than Frozen Four.

to which I agree.

this was my fault, I need to be more clear.

Wanna know who can clear up this confusion?


Tyge Rice (or whatever that nagh00pz lover's name was)

i prefer to watch men's college hockey over women's hoops. i am not judging this other fellow, and the viewing choices he makes, he is allowed to watch whatever he wants. this is still america, even with obama, and we are still free. if he enjoys the fundamental aspects of the game, he can watch all the women's hoops he wants to.

Not a fan of Uconn or women's hoops. Just pointing out that college hockey doesn't have a large national following. Espn is not pimping the Frozen Four because it knows the market is limited, which is why it dumped the NHL contract years ago. During my years at BC the football and hoops were great and the hockey was bad. I'd take that trade off every time.

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:Not a fan of Uconn or women's hoops. Just pointing out that college hockey doesn't have a large national following. Espn is not pimping the Frozen Four because it knows the market is limited, which is why it dumped the NHL contract years ago. During my years at BC the football and hoops were great and the hockey was bad. I'd take that trade off every time.

what years were those yukon's stones?

'91-'95

I think you misremember the basketball team and football team from half your college career

It's all relative. One deep run in NCAA tourney in '93-'94 to Elite Eight and two top 20 football teams in ''92 and '93 -- including a win over #1 ND in South Bend and a near berth in Sugar Bowl (Thanks, David Green) after Coughlin got settled.

I think that's a nice four-year stretch for BC. I'd trade that "success" for subpar hockey every time, but maybe you're a big puckhead, which is fair enough.

the basketball team sucked ass in 90-91 (9th of 9 in the big east), sucked a little less in 91-92 (8th of 10 in the big east) and vastly underachieved in 92-93 (7th of 10 in the big east). quite frankly, if danya's ass hadn't beaten carolina in 94... that team also would have been a large disappointment (and also finished the season unranked - even after an elite 8 run)

but, if you long for the days of nit appearances you should be quite content with chris jimtian. that's as high as he'll aim too

of course, all of that ignore that you're a yukon troll that's full of shit

and surely you are a 300-pound chick in a trailer with a bad weave and a 900 sex hotline

go fuck yourself

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:and surely you are a 300-pound chick in a trailer with a bad weave and a 900 sex hotline

go fuck yourself

i like this guy, could only be topped if he meatbombed tre

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:and surely you are a 300-pound chick in a trailer with a bad weave and a 900 sex hotline

go fuck yourself

well this joke seems to age you to about 91-95; so that part of your claimed identity appears to be accurate.

sadly, it also steers you closer to being a yukon fan/grad/night school student

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:and surely you are a 300-pound chick in a trailer with a bad weave and a 900 sex hotline

go fuck yourself

the number is 976-DICK. trust me on this.

DavidGordonsFoot {l Wrote}:

Ron's Stones {l Wrote}:and surely you are a 300-pound chick in a trailer with a bad weave and a 900 sex hotline

go fuck yourself

the number is 976-DICK. trust me on this.

foot - we know you like chicks with dicks... it's been said over and over. i don't think you need to continue to reinforce the point