Statement from GDF

Forum rules
"The opinions expressed on this board are property of the poster and do not reflect the opinion of EagleOutsider, Boston College or Boston College Athletics"

Re: Statement from GDF

Postby commavegarage on Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:31 pm

The "incident" this year...what you mentioned doesn't include all that was swept under the rug....which I'd imagine there is at least some stuff.
hey huerta if you readin this dont tell jimmy **** that i put xlax in teh chuck wagons...lol
commavegarage
Devlin Hall
 
Posts: 7230
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:33 pm
Karma: 749

Re: Statement from GDF

Postby b0mberMan on Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:33 pm

bignick33 {l Wrote}:
FirstDownSyndrome {l Wrote}:
bignick33 {l Wrote}:
BCMcG {l Wrote}:
bcaddict {l Wrote}:I heard the longest of long shots isn't necessarily that much of a long shot.


If he's truly receptive to coaching at his alma mater then money would probably be the only holdup, because he's exactly what the basketball program needs right now.

Fr Leahy {l Wrote}:Dear Barbara and Patrick Roche,

Thank you very much for your generous donation of $20 million dollars. Remember when we said it was going toward a Catholic education center. Yeah, that's not going to work out. We need to pay Bruce Pearl to be our basketball coach. I hope that's cool.

WPL, SJ


Even putting $ aside, I'm not sure how big of an obstacle it would be to the administration (namely Leahy, not GDF) that he's been surrounded by some scandals. Put simply, he's not an alter-boy (not a pun on his religion). This would not be a typical hire for the BC Board of Trustees.

Addict, why are you getting my hopes up? He would be virtually the perfect hire.


What precisely concerns you about Pearl and scandals? There is the one recruiting issue at Iowa but that doesn't really make him seem all that bad? What am I missing here? Thanks.


There's the Iowa incident, there's the release of scholarship-players when he got to UT, there are pics like the one I posted above, etc. I'm not concerned about these issues. However, I think the Board might be.


Having a third of your team suspended/kicked off for guns this year. I'm not anti-Pearl at all and I know that players under Skinner weren't exactly saints either, but the stuff at Tenn gets more press and therefore there's more things for the board and Leahy to wring their hands about.

But if it's simply a matter of Gene driving a dump truck full of money to Pearl's house and assuring him "it's your show. I'm a football guy (but make the players call me Coach Flip is all I ask)" then I'd love to see this happen.Realistically, I'm just rooting for anyone who isn't named "Amacker."
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
b0mberMan
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 9580
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:43 pm
Location: Cat hair pee fire
Karma: 2681

Re: Statement from GDF

Postby HJS on Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:49 pm

Bruce Pearl or bust! The pics of the women thing shouldn't be a concern anymore. Pearl is engaged now to Brandy Miller.
ImageImage
Image
Image
"The Michelangelo of stupidity is again on top of his scaffolding, lying on his back and painting a masterpiece of imbecility on the ceiling of a virtual Sistine Chapel." © 2023 A AngryDick Joint
User avatar
HJS
Gasson Hall
 
Posts: 16624
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 12:08 pm
Karma: 606

Re: Statement from GDF

Postby bcaddict on Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:52 pm

I don't think they hire Pearl, but I'm happy to hear that it's not impossible. I hope BC truly reaches out to him.
bcaddict
Carney Hall
 
Posts: 488
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:54 pm
Karma: 26

Re: Statement from GDF

Postby b0mberMan on Tue Mar 30, 2010 1:57 pm

bcaddict {l Wrote}:I don't think they hire Pearl, but I'm happy to hear that it's not impossible. I hope BC truly reaches out to him.


You've got to at least place the call, right? You can't declare a "national coaching search" and not take a shot that the recently successful alum has always dreamed of coaching his alma mater in a power conference? Right?

It was one thing when the football search went the way it did. I didn't believe for a second that Gene was not going with the Stache. But from the sound of things, he doesn't have his next guy in line, just a list of potential fits from the mid major ranks. While you're vetting them out, you have to place the call to Pearl. It's unthinkable not to.
NorthEndEagle {l Wrote}:cat hair pee fire
b0mberMan
Lyons Hall
 
Posts: 9580
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:43 pm
Location: Cat hair pee fire
Karma: 2681

Re: Statement from GDF

Postby bignick33 on Tue Mar 30, 2010 2:04 pm

b0mberMan {l Wrote}:
bcaddict {l Wrote}:I don't think they hire Pearl, but I'm happy to hear that it's not impossible. I hope BC truly reaches out to him.


You've got to at least place the call, right? You can't declare a "national coaching search" and not take a shot that the recently successful alum has always dreamed of coaching his alma mater in a power conference? Right?

It was one thing when the football search went the way it did. I didn't believe for a second that Gene was not going with the Stache. But from the sound of things, he doesn't have his next guy in line, just a list of potential fits from the mid major ranks. While you're vetting them out, you have to place the call to Pearl. It's unthinkable not to.


I agree that SpazaNewJersey was the only real inquiry in the last search, but the searches that produced Jags, Crowley, and Aoki were all legitimate. BC actually has consistently done a pretty good, if unremarkable, job hiring coaches. I don't think that this search with be fraudulent even if we don't like the eventual hire. Here's the thing: how will we know if BC even inquires on Pearl? Typically BC's coaching searches are pretty airtight, at least in comparison to other big programs (compare the leakage of names in the upcoming search to the very public search that SJU just put on). I don't think we will have any idea what happens with Pearl if he doesn't take the job; BC would not leak it, as they don't want the public to know that he dissed us, if that's what ends up happening.

My prediction:
1) BC inquires on Pearl
2) BC is rebuffed after they are unwilling to pay 3 mil a year.
3) We never hear about it.
4) HJS continues with his anti-GDF propaganda on the basis that Pearl wasn't "considered."
I drink whiskey instead of water.
User avatar
bignick33
Fulton Hall
 
Posts: 12825
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:31 pm
Karma: 909

Previous

Return to Conte Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Untitled document