HJS wrote:Why is Jorgenson a need? We have Hanlan, Rahon, Heck, LoJack and Drags. Why do we need a 6th guy who can play the 2??? I think the priority should be Kanter, Reynolds and Kelly... probably in that order. I'd take any two of them before looking at Jorgenson.
I definitely agree they need a 4 before another point, but I get the logic behind it. For better or worse, Don is going to play a lot of 3 guard lineups and likes to have two guys with point ability out there. Jackson's handle has gotten better but he's definitely not a point, so we really only have 2 on the team. To run the lineup Don wants, a third point makes sense (cue comments about Jordan Daniels here, not that I necessarily disagree).