eagle9903 wrote:MattTheEagle wrote:eepstein0 wrote:How do people feel about a Jorgensen, Owens and Kelly class of 2013?
I'd give it a solid B. Highly rated PG and a couple high level athletes.
B sounds about right, maybe a B+. Both Owens and Kelly would help a lot.
Jorgensen would be a nice addition too. I like Hanlan but he plays a very different game than say Daniels. Hanlan is more of a shooter/slasher. I am hoping Jorgensen fits more of the ballhandling/passing role that Daniels excelled at.
I do not agree with this assessment of the games of Olivier Hanlan or Jordan Daniels.
My "assessment" is just based on observing most of the games from this year and last. After posting this, I noticed the stats support what I was trying to say. This isn't to say that Hanlan is a bad passer or ballhandler, he just isn't quite at Daniels level yet. Nonetheless, I do think Hanlan is the better PG overall.
Is it your contention that Hanlan and Daniels are the same type of PG? I am not trying to start an argument, I am just curious how your assessment differs.