flyingelvii {l Wrote}:eagletx {l Wrote}:I'll tell you what bothers me about it: Kromer is a Miami Ohio guy.....that seems to be why he is in the mix at this point.
So with all the possible NFL assistants out there, some with BC ties, and some with recent meaningful college experience, like a Roman, how is it that Bates decided instead to consider an NFL position coach with no recent college experience, whose candidacy runs somewhat contrary to the criteria that Bates spelled out on numerous occasions, that is a guy with proven (head) coaching (and presumable college) experience other than his connection via Miami???? Does being the interim head at NO after their fiasco give him the HC experience that Bates advertised? Maybe....but it would be an off the charts choice, and yes, I think it would hurt the perception of the program and the AD, and fan interest in the football program in the short run.
Personally, I think the recruiting responsibilities of the hire is right up their in importance when you are looking at the chasm that BC is in....pulling a relative "no name" with no recent college experience from the NFL ranks is a huge gamble at a place like BC in our current depressed situation. So I gotta' question why this guy qualifies as a good choice when viewed in relation to the other names mentioned. In the college world of living rooms (i.e. of recruiting), the name Golden or Diaco certainly has more cache than the name Kromer.
Tom Coughlin didn't. Nor did Jags. People are literally just throwing shit at the wall right now.
Edit: Recent college coaching experience, not BC connection. I don't think the BC connection should be that big of a deal breaker.
That's beside the point and frankly not relevant, as Coughlin was here only three years, Jags was here two, and their recruiting, quite frankly, didn't have a huge impact on their success...I'm not saying that an NFL guy couldn't succeed eventually. But if the criteria that BB established up front was that we will look at anyone and everyone, college or pro, position coach or HC, recent college experience or not, then the world is his playground. But he didn't. At least not publicly. I'm not trying to say that Kromer will be a failure if he becomes HC here. But his candidacy is a surprise, it appears contrary to Bates' own stated objectives in the search process, and undoubtedly was a result, not forged of BFF relations, but more likely Kromer's agent letting Bates know he was interested, I assume. But then the Miami connection may have come into play, as I don't otherwise see what distinguishes Kromer over the many other mentioned NFL (or college) types that have been kicked around.
I think Golden or Diaco, or even one or two of the other MAC coaches would be in a better position in the BC scenario to do what needs to be done quickly, that is recruit.